Cited by 38Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cultural variation in temporal associations among somatic complaints, anxiety, and depressive symptoms in adolescence

Open access
Kim, Jacqueline H.J., Tsai, William, Kodish, Tamar, Trung, Lam T., Lau, Anna S., Weiss, Bahr·2019·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective: Different domains of internalizing symptoms (somatic, anxiety, depressive) often occur concurrently, suggesting that they may share common etiology. In longitudinal analyses of internalizing among youth, anxiety is often found to precede depression. However, relatively few studies have also assessed how somatic problems, the third symptom domain, are involved in longitudinal patterns of internalizing. In addition, temporal relations among internalizing symptom domains may vary by cultural group as somatic symptoms are posited to be a more culturally-normative way of communicating or experiencing distress in non-Western, interdependent cultures. Thus, the present study examined longitudinal relations among these three internalizing symptom domains in three ethnocultural adolescent samples. Methods: 304 European American, 420 Vietnamese American, and 717 Vietnamese adolescents’ self-reported internalizing symptoms (somatic, anxiety, depressive) were assessed at three time points, spaced three months apart, using multigroup cross-lagged path analysis. Results: Anxiety symptoms consistently predicted increases in depressive symptoms in European American adolescents. In contrast, for Vietnamese and Vietnamese American adolescents, the most consistent relation was with somatic complaints predicting increases in anxiety. Anxiety and depressive symptoms bidirectionally predicted each other among the Vietnamese and Vietnamese American adolescents. Conclusions: Cultural group differences were evident in the temporal course of internalizing symptoms. The pattern of results have implications for culturally relevant intervention targets, during a developmental period of risk for internalizing disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109763

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT reduces both panic frequency and sleep-related anxiety in PD, supported by multiple RCTs and meta-analyses.

    “CBT directly targets the cognitive distortions and catastrophic thinking that sustain panic symptoms, and remains one of the most extensively validated interventions for PD, supported by multiple RCTs and meta-analyses demonstrating efficacy in reducing both panic frequency and sleep-related anxiety [108-110].”

    From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Introduction discusses associations among somatic complaints, anxiety, and depression, while Methods > Analysis describes a longitudinal analysis of adolescent symptoms (page numbers not provided). Searches for CBT, panic frequency, sleep-related anxiety, and treatment trials found no passage addressing the claimed efficacy in panic disorder. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. H. J., Tsai, W., Kodish, T., Trung, L. T., Lau, A. S., & Weiss, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jacqueline H.J.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
124
Pages
109763
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954863263
Cited by
38
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California, Los Angeles (5 T32 MH015750)
  • Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5 T32 MH015750, R01 MH077697)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
somatic symptoms, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, internalizing problems, adolescents, cultural variation, temporal association, European American adolescents, interdependent culture, emotion regulation, emotional expression
MeSH terms
Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Adolescent, Anxiety, Culture, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review