Cited by 66Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careHealth and Well-being Studies

Social support in multiple sclerosis: associations with quality of life, depression, and anxiety

Open access
Ratajska, Adrianna, Glanz, Bonnie I., Chitnis, Tanuja, Weiner, Howard L., Healy, Brian C.·2020·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective Social support plays a role in the well-being of persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The aims of this study were to compare social support in PwMS with relapsing versus progressive disease, examine the relationships with patient reported outcomes (PROs), and investigate social support longitudinally.Methods For this study, we have performed an analysis of data routinely collected from subjects enrolled in the CLIMB at the Partners MS Center. Subjects (n = 789) completed measures of social support, quality of life (QOL), depression, and anxiety. Relapsing and progressive PwMS were compared using a two sample t-test, and linear regression was used to adjust for other variables. Correlations between social support and PROs were assessed using partial Pearson's correlation coefficient. A random intercept and slope model with a linear trend with time estimated the change over time.Results Subjects with relapsing MS reported higher overall social support than subjects with progressive disease (difference in means = -6.7; 95% CI: -10.3, -3.1) as well as higher levels of 3 of the 4 dimensions of social support measured. These differences remained after adjusting for age and gender only, but were attenuated adjusting for age, gender, and depression (adjusted difference in means = -1.2; 95% CI: -5.0, 2.6). Higher overall social support was associated with higher QOL (r = 0.16-0.27), lower depression (r = -0.36), and lower state (r = -0.27) and trait (r = -0.29) anxiety. Social support was mostly stable over time.Conclusion Social support was associated with QOL, depression, and anxiety in PwMS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110252

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ratajska, A., Glanz, B. I., Chitnis, T., Weiner, H. L., & Healy, B. C.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Healy, Brian C.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
138
Pages
110252
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087200787
Cited by
66
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Merck
  • Department of Defense
  • National MS Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
social support, multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, progressive multiple sclerosis, quality of life, depression, anxiety, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review