Cited by 110Education during COVID-19 pandemicSchool Choice and PerformanceCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Pandemic Schooling Mode and Student Test Scores: Evidence from US States

Open access
Halloran, Clare, Jack, Rebecca, Okun, James, Oster, Emily·2021·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

We estimate the impact of district-level schooling mode (in-person versus hybrid or distance learning) on test scores.We combine Spring 2021 state standardized test score data with comprehensive data on schooling in the 2020-21 school year across 12 states.We find that pass rates declined compared to prior years and that these declines were larger in districts with less inperson instruction.Passing rates in math declined by 14.2 percentage points on average; we estimate this decline was 10.1 percentage points smaller for districts fully in-person.Changes in English language arts scores were smaller, but were significantly larger in districts with larger populations of students who are Black, Hispanic or eligible for free and reduced price lunch.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/w29497

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Halloran et al. (2021) show that shares of in-person schooling time varied from 9 percent in Virginia to 98 percent in Florida.

    “Halloran et al. (2021) use school district-level data from 12 US states for the 2020-2021 academic year and show that shares of in-person schooling time varied from 9 percent in Virginia to 98 percent in Florida.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Halloran et al. (2021)

  • Halloran et al. (2021) see larger effects in districts with more students of color and a greater number of students eligible for free lunch.

    “The authors see larger effects in districts with more students of color and a greater number of students eligible for free lunch.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Halloran et al. (2021)

  • Halloran et al. (2021) conclude that this gap would have only been four percentage points if schools had remained open throughout the period, though the effects are likely to be downward biased due to missing data.

    “By associating variation in time spent in different learning modes over the 2020/2021 academic year (remote, hybrid, in-person) with district-level information on test scores, the authors conclude that this gap would have only been four percentage points if schools had remained open throughout the period, though the effects are likely to be downward biased due to missing data.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Halloran et al. (2021)

  • Halloran et al. (2021) confirm that districts with a greater share of black students and a higher share of students receiving free lunches offered less in-person schooling.

    “Halloran et al. (2021) confirm this picture in a sample of 12 states, documenting that districts with a greater share of black students and a higher share of students receiving free lunches offered less in-person schooling.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Halloran et al. (2021)

  • Halloran et al. (2021) show that proficiency rates in English and math were on average 14 percentage points lower during the pandemic.

    “grade, Halloran et al. (2021) show that proficiency rates in English and math were on average 14 percentage points lower during the pandemic.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Halloran et al. (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halloran, C., Jack, R., Okun, J., & Oster, E.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
2021-11
OpenAlex
W3217181281
Cited by
110
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 3
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Arnold Ventures
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, face-to-face teaching, hybrid learning, distance education, standardized test scores, pass rates, academic performance, racial and ethnic disparities, school districts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review