Cited by 105Eating Disorders and BehaviorsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

#Take idealized bodies out of the picture: A scoping review of social media content aiming to protect and promote positive body image

Rodgers, Rachel F., Paxton, Susan J., Wertheim, Eleanor H.·2021·Body Image

Abstract

Much evidence has highlighted detrimental effects of social media on body image, and attention has turned towards identifying content that could support and promote positive body image. This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of the emerging evidence focused on social media content that might support positive body image. A total of n = 35 studies (21 experimental) examining social media were identified along with n = 11 studies not specifically focusing on social media but with clear implications. Overall, findings suggest that images that do not portray individuals are most helpful for body image, as well as those portraying appearances diverging from appearance ideals. Our review also identifies types of social media content that have so far not been found to protect body image, and those not sufficiently evaluated. Regarding textual captions and comments, the most promising avenue involves highlighting the contrived and unrealistic nature of social media content. However, empirical data are limited and not robust. Body acceptance-related statements have so far not been found to be helpful for body image, and findings regarding the usefulness of using social marketing strategies (such as hashtags) to identify content that may be more realistic is nascent and conflicted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.009

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodgers, R. F., Paxton, S. J., & Wertheim, E. H.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Rodgers, Rachel F.
Venue
Body Image
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
38
Pages
10-36
ISSN
1740-1445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3145264306
Cited by
101
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Body Image (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media content, positive body image, appearance ideals, body acceptance, social marketing, hashtags
MeSH terms
Body Image, Humans, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review