The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How much do narcissists really like themselves? Using the bogus pipeline procedure to better understand the self-esteem of narcissists
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from these approaches have yielded mixed evidence; one study found that narcissistic women inflate their self-esteem (Myers & Zeigler-Hill 2012), whereas another found no evidence of inflation for narcissistic men or women (Brunell & Fisher 2014).”
From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Myers & Zeigler-Hill 2012
Citations
Cites
Unraveling the Paradoxes of Narcissism: A Dynamic Self-Regulatory Processing Model
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1204_1 · Cited by 2,215
Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem.
Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.895 · Cited by 2,007 · cited 2×
“The SSES has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure of state self-esteem (Heatherton & Polivy, 1991).”
BackgroundA Narcissistic Personality Inventory.
Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590 · Cited by 1,975
Narcissism and Self-Evaluation Maintenance: Explorations in Object Relations
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293196001 · Cited by 281
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Blascovich, 1991, Measures of self-esteem, Vol. 1, 115
- Bosson, 2008, Untangling the links between narcissism and self-esteem: A theoretical and empirical review, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1415, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00089.x · DOI · Paper page
- Boysen, 2006, A public versus private administration of the implicit association test, European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 845, 10.1002/ejsp.318 · DOI · Paper page
- Emmons, 1987, Narcissism: Theory and measurement, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11, 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.11 · DOI
- Gregg, 2010, Narcissistic fragility: Rethinking its links to explicit and implicit self-esteem, Self and Identity, 9, 142, 10.1080/15298860902815451 · DOI
- Jones, 1971, The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude, Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349, 10.1037/h0031617 · DOI
- Jordan, 2003, Secure and defensive high self-esteem, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969, 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.969 · DOI · Paper page
- Kohut, 1966, Forms and transformations of narcissism, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 14, 243, 10.1177/000306516601400201 · DOI · Paper page
- Paulhus, 1998, Interpersonal and intrapsychic adaptiveness of trait self-enhancement: A mixed blessing?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1197, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1197 · DOI · Paper page
- Raskin, 1981, The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity, Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159, 10.1207/s15327752jpa4502_10 · DOI
- Raskin, 1988, A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890 · DOI · Paper page
- Zeigler-Hill, 2006, Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem: Implications for narcissism and self-esteem instability, Journal of Personality, 74, 119, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00371.x · DOI · Paper page
- Zeigler-Hill, 2009, Is high self-esteem a path to the White House? The implicit theory of self-esteem and the willingness to vote for presidential candidates, Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 14, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.018 · DOI
- Zeigler-Hill, 2011, An implicit theory of self-esteem: The consequences of perceived self-esteem for romantic desirability, Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 147, 10.1177/147470491100900202 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244 · Cited by 572
Cohen, L. J., Tanis, T., Bhattacharjee, R., Nesci, C., Halmi, W., & Galynker, I. (2014) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.036 · Cited by 105
Mentalization-Based Treatment for Pathological Narcissism
Drozek, R. P., & Unruh, B. T. (2020) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2020.34.supp.177 · Cited by 64
Thomaes, S., & Brummelman, E. (2016) · Developmental Psychopathology · doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy316 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Myers, E. M., & Zeigler-Hill, V.
- Affiliations
- Western Carolina University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Myers, Erin M.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 102-105
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092009827
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- narcissism, self-esteem, self-report bias, self-love, women
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review