Cited by 597Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Secure and defensive high self-esteem.

Jordan, Christian H., Spencer, Steven J., Zanna, Mark P., Hoshino-Browne, Etsuko, Correll, Joshua·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Long-standing theories have suggested high self-esteem (SE) can assume qualitatively different forms that are related to defensiveness. The authors explored whether some high-SE individuals are particularly defensive because they harbor negative self-feelings at less conscious levels, indicated by low implicit SE. In Study 1, participants high in explicit SE but low in implicit SE showed the highest levels of narcissism--an indicator of defensiveness. In Studies 2 and 3, the correspondence between implicit and explicit SE predicted defensive behavior (in-group bias in Study 2 and dissonance reduction in Study 3), such that for high explicit-SE participants, those with relatively low implicit SE behaved more defensively. These results are consistent with the idea that high SE can be relatively secure or defensive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.969

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These opposing tendencies will presumably lead to experiences of cognitive and affective dissonance, which parallels previous findings showing that high narcissism goes along with discrepancies such as high explicit but low implicit self-esteem.

    “These opposing tendencies will presumably lead to experiences of cognitive and affective dissonance, which parallels previous findings showing that high narcissism goes along with discrepancies such as high explicit but low implicit self-esteem (Jordan et al., 2003).”

    From The Relationship between Grandiose and Vulnerable (Hypersensitive) Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Jordan et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Correll, J.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
969-978
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2064776065
Cited by
597
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 40
FWCI
18.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
self-esteem, implicit self-esteem, explicit self-esteem, narcissism, defensiveness, in-group favoritism, dissonance reduction, implicit attitudes, self-concept
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Awareness, Cognitive Dissonance, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Narcissism, Personality Inventory, Reaction Time, Self Concept, Word Association Tests, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review