Cited by 34Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Which social media platforms matter and for whom? Examining moderators of links between adolescents' social media use and depressive symptoms

Open access
Gentzler, Amy L., Hughes, Jeffrey L., Johnston, Matty, Alderson, Jacob E.·2023·Journal of Adolescence

Abstract

Introduction: Despite extensive research on social media and risks for mental health, not enough is known about individual differences in these risks. Methods: The present study, with data collected from 2018 to 2020, investigated the association between social media use (total and for specific platforms) and depressive symptoms in a sample of 237 American adolescents ( M age = 15.10; SD = 0.49; 51.1% girls and 48.5% boys). We investigated several moderators: gender, self‐esteem, personality, and negative reactions to social media. Covariates were gender, timing of the follow‐up (pre vs. during the pandemic), and depressive symptoms a year earlier. Results: Results indicated that greater total time spent on social media was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms. This effect held for Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube (but not Snapchat, Facebook, or Twitter). Several moderated effects were found. Twitter was associated with more depressive symptoms for girls but not boys. More frequent Instagram use was linked to more depressive symptoms for less or average‐level extraverted teens but not for more extraverted teens, suggesting extraversion may be protective. More frequent TikTok use was associated with more depressive symptoms, particularly for teens who said they have more or average‐level negative reactions to social media a year earlier. Conclusions: This study suggests that certain adolescents may be at increased risk for serious mental health challenges, like elevated depressive symptoms, when using TikTok, Instagram, or Twitter more frequently, underscoring the importance of examining individual differences and particular social media platforms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jad.12243

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among included studies, only four reported data about total daily screen time, and four detailed the amount of time spent on TikTok.

    “Among the included studies, only four reported data about total daily screen time [67–70], and four detailed the amount the time spent on TikTok [42, 67, 71, 72].”
  • Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation, of which only six paired it with standardized measures.

    “Eleven studies used self-developed questionnaires for outcome evaluation [42, 67–72, 74, 80–82], of which only six paired it with standardized measures [67–69, 71, 72, 80, 81].”
  • Four of the included studies assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues.

    “Four of the studies [68, 75, 79, 80] assessed wellbeing indicators, like creativity, innovation, life satisfaction, and health habits, while sixteen assessed mental disorder indicators such as depression, anxiety, stress or body image issues [42, 67, 68, 70–73, 76–79, 81–85].”
  • Gentzler et al. highlighted that less extroverted teens and those most prone to negative reactions reported elevated depressive symptoms when using TikTok.

    “Gentzler et al. [71] highlighted that less extroverted teens and those most prone to negative reactions reported elevated depressive symptoms when using TikTok.”
  • Most of the review's studies reported negative effects of food-, diet- or weight-related contents on body image, increasing in users the perceived importance of their physical appearance to others.

    “most of the review’s studies reported negative effects of food-, diet- or weight-related contents on body image [42, 71], increasing in users the perceived importance of their physical appearance to others [80].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gentzler, A. L., Hughes, J. L., Johnston, M., & Alderson, J. E.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-12
Volume
95
Issue
8
Pages
1725-1748
ISSN
  • 0140-1971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9254
OpenAlex
W4386623891
Cited by
34
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6
FWCI
14.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (NICHD R15 HD078920‐01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social media use, depressive symptoms, adolescents, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, YouTube, Snapchat, Facebook, self-esteem, extraversion, gender differences, COVID-19 pandemic, individual differences, mental health risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review