The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569 · cited 5×
“In the meta-analysis literature, questions have arisen about cases in which a single study yields more than one effect size (see Lipsey & Wilson, 2001; Norris & Ortega, 2000; Rosenthal, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs
Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.170 · Cited by 1,693 · cited 1×
“More importantly, the use of F or t scores from a repeated measures design such as this one leads to an overestimation (Dunlap et al., 1996).”
BackgroundThe influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · cited 1×
“Ferris (1995a) presented a survey of students’ views, as did Ferris (1997), except that she also noted that students showed some success in using corrections to revise a piece of writing.”
BackgroundThe effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Adams, 2003, L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development, Language Teaching Research, 7, 347, 10.1191/1362168803lr127oa · DOI
- Ashwell, 2000, Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227, 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Bitchener, 2005, The effect of different types of feedback on ESL student writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191, 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Chandler, 2003, The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267, 10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Chandler, 2004, A response to Truscott, Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 345, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.001 · DOI
- Cohen, 1992, A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · Paper page
- Ellis, 2000, Editor's statement, Language Learning, 50, xi, 10.1111/0023-8333.00135 · DOI
- Fazio, 2001, The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 235, 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00042-X · DOI · Paper page
- Ferris, 1995, Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms, TESOL Quarterly, 29, 33, 10.2307/3587804 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferris, 1995, Teaching students to self-edit, TESOL Journal, 4, 18
- Ferris, 1999, The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996), Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferris, 2004, The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?), Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferris, 2001, Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?, Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161, 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X · DOI · Paper page
- Frantzen, 1995, The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course, Modern Language Journal, 79, 329, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb01108.x · DOI
- Kepner, 1991, An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills, Modern Language Journal, 75, 305, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x · DOI · Paper page
- Kleinmann, 1977, Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition, Language Learning, 27, 93, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00294.x · DOI · Paper page
- Lalande, 1982, Reducing composition errors: An experiment, Modern Language Journal, 66, 140, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, 1997, ESL learners’ performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching, System, 25, 465, 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00045-6 · DOI
- Lee, 2004, Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong, Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Leki, 1991, The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes, Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x · DOI · Paper page
- Perkins, 1975, The effect of formal language instruction on the order of morpheme acquisition, Language Learning, 25, 237, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00243.x · DOI
- Polio, 1998, “If I only had more time:” ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions, Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43, 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90005-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Robb, 1986, Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality, TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83, 10.2307/3586390 · DOI · Paper page
- Schachter, 1974, An error in error analysis, Language Learning, 24, 205, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00502.x · DOI · Paper page
- Semke, H.M. (1980). The comparative effects of four methods of treating free-writing assignments on the second language skills and attitudes of students in college level first year German. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Minnesota.
- Semke, 1984, Effects of the red pen, Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195, 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x · DOI · Paper page
- Sheppard, 1992, Two feedback types: Do they make a difference?, RELC Journal, 23, 103, 10.1177/003368829202300107 · DOI · Paper page
- Truscott, 1996, The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes, Language Learning, 46, 327, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · DOI · Paper page
- Truscott, 1999, The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80124-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Truscott, 1999, What's wrong with oral grammar correction, Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437, 10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437 · DOI · Paper page
- Truscott, 2001, Selecting errors for selective error correction, Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27, 225
- Truscott, 2004, Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler, Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337, 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12079 · Cited by 1,960
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087 · Cited by 1,199
“Miller (2003), Russel and Spada (2006), Truscott (2007), Li (2010), Kang and Han (2015) and Brown (2016) have all similarly noted that the effectiveness of corrective feedback is influenced by additional moderating variables, such as learners’ proficiency, the setting, and the genre of the task (Kang…”
The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis
Li, S. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x · Cited by 941
Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development
Ellis, R. (2009) · L2 Journal · doi:10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054 · Cited by 659
“Truscott replied by claiming that Ferris failed to cite any evidence in support of her contention.”
BackgroundInfluentialFerris, D. R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990490 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Truscott, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 255-272
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141497046
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 186.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
