Cited by 91Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Physical Activity Early after Stroke and Its Association to Functional Outcome 3 Months Later

Askim, Torunn, Bernhardt, Julie, Salvesen, Øyvind, Indredavik, Bent·2014·Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background Early rehabilitation that includes early mobilization and increased amount of motor activity is hypothesized to be one of the most important factors contributing to the beneficial effect of comprehensive stroke unit treatment, whereas too much bed rest is hypothesized to be harmful. The purpose of the present study was to assess the association between early activity/bed rest and functional outcome 3 months later.Methods This was a prospective cohort study including patients with the diagnosis of stroke admitted to Trondheim University Hospital, Norway. Patients were eligible if they were less than 14 days poststroke and did not receive palliative care. Motor activity/bed rest was recorded in the acute phase using a standard method of observation, and the outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 3 months later. A proportional odds model was used to analyze the association between motor activity/bed rest and outcome. All analyses were adjusted for age, gender, stroke severity, time from stroke to observation, and prestroke function.Results A total of 106 patients (mean age 79.0 years, 56.6% men) were included. The odds ratio for a higher mRS score (poor outcome) was 1.04 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.07, P = .001) as time in bed increased and .97 (95% CI .93-1.02, P = .283) as time in motor activity increased.Conclusions This study confirms that time in bed in the early phase is associated with poor functional outcome 3 months later, indicating that too much bed rest should be avoided in the early phase after stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.12.011

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Askim, T., Bernhardt, J., Salvesen, Ø., & Indredavik, B.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Askim, Torunn
Venue
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
e305-e312
ISSN
1052-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016226591
Cited by
91
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
stroke, bed rest, early mobilization, functional outcome, modified Rankin Scale, stroke rehabilitation, motor activity, time in bed
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bed Rest, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, Female, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Norway, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Stroke, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review