Cited by 289Gender Diversity and InequalityCritical Race Theory in EducationLeadership and Management in Organizations

A critical review of race and ethnicity in the leadership literature: Surfacing context, power and the collective dimensions of leadership

Ospina, Sonia, Foldy, Erica·2009·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.005

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 160 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ospina, S., & Foldy, E.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Ospina, Sonia
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
876-896
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004299222
Cited by
288
References
160
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
14.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
Keywords
race, ethnicity, leadership, people of color, leadership enactment, leadership perceptions, context, power, shared leadership, structure and agency, Black studies, communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review