CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 723Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementEmployee Performance and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 192 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda

Open access
Inceoglu, Ilke, Thomas, Geoff, Chu, Chris, Plans, David, Gerbasi, Alexandra·2018·The Leadership Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006

Cites

192 of 192 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 194 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 723

Related

Metadata

Authors
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Inceoglu, Ilke
ORCID
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
179-202
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
OpenAlex
W2777732035
Cited by
670
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 2
FWCI
57.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
Keywords
leadership behavior, employee well-being, job satisfaction, change leadership, relational leadership, task-oriented leadership, passive leadership, mediation, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, negative affect, physical well-being, employee performance, theoretical framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review