CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychological and Educational Research Studies

The role of explicit need strength for emotions during learning

Flunger, Barbara, Pretsch, Johanna, Schmitt, Manfred, Ludwig, Peter·2013·Learning and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of need satisfaction on individuals' felt emotions and well-being become gradually less strong with decreasing explicit need strength, but even those low in need strength did not benefit from dissatisfaction or frustration of their needs.

    “To illustrate, the effects of need satisfaction on individuals' felt emotions (Flünger et al. 2013) andwellbeing (Van Assche et al. 2018) become gradually less strong with decreasing explicit need strength, but even those low in need strength did not benefit from dissatisfaction or frustration of their needs (see also Schüler et al. 2016).”

    From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Flünger et al. 2013

  • Their moderating role in the relations between need-based experiences and outcomes still appears to be relatively weak.

    “Nonetheless, their moderating role in the relations between need-based experiences and outcomes still appears to be relatively weak (e.g., Chen et al. 2015a;Flünger et al. 2013;Van Assche et al. 2018).”

    From Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions (2020) · cites this paper as Flünger et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Flunger, B., Pretsch, J., Schmitt, M., & Ludwig, P.
Affiliations
University of Koblenz and Landau (DE)
Corresponding author
Flunger, Barbara
ORCID
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
23
Pages
241-248
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.001
OpenAlex
W2043125150
Cited by
20
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
self-determination theory, need satisfaction, achievement emotions, situational interest, joy, boredom, autonomy, competence, relatedness, moderation, adolescents, student motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review