The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial mechanisms of cinnamon and its constituents: A review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND In the current healthcare environment, an alarming rise in multi-drug resistant bacterial infections has led to a global health threat. The lack of new antibiotics has created a need for developing alternative strategies. OBJECTIVE Understanding the antibacterial mechanisms of cinnamon and its constituents is crucial to enhance it as a potential new source of antibiotic. The objective of this review is to provide a compilation of all described mechanisms of antibacterial action of cinnamon and its constituents and synergism with commercial antibiotics in order to better understand how cinnamon and its constituents can collaborate as alternative treatment to multi-drug resistant bacterial infections. METHODS The relevant references on antibacterial activities of cinnamon and its constituents were searched. Meanwhile, the references were classified according to the type of mechanism of action against bacteria. Relationships of cinnamon or its constituents and antibiotics were also analyzed and summarized. RESULTS Cinnamon extracts, essential oils, and their compounds have been reported to inhibit bacteria by damaging cell membrane; altering the lipid profile; inhibiting ATPases, cell division, membrane porins, motility, and biofilm formation; and via anti-quorum sensing effects. CONCLUSION This review describes the antibacterial effects of cinnamon and its constituents, such as cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid, against pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The review also provides an overview of the current knowledge of the primary modes of action of these compounds as well as the synergistic interactions between cinnamon or its constituents with known antibacterial agents. This information will be useful in improving the effectiveness of therapeutics based on these compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms
Donlan, R. M., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002 · Cited by 6,644
Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons
Sikkema, J., de Bont, J. A., & Poolman, B. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.2.201-222.1995 · Cited by 2,685
Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts
Hammer, K. A., Carson, C. F., & Riley, T. V. (1999) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00780.x · Cited by 2,560
Hyldgaard, M., Mygind, T., & Meyer, R. L. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00012 · Cited by 2,191
Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria
Nazzaro, F., Fratianni, F., De Martino, L., Coppola, R., & De Feo, V. (2013) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph6121451 · Cited by 2,186
Martínez, J. L. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00001 · Cited by 2,101
THE MITOCHONDRIAL ELECTRON TRANSPORT AND OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION SYSTEM
Hatefi, Y. (1985) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.005055 · Cited by 1,680
Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on Gram-negative bacteria
Helander, I. M., Alakomi, H.-L., Latva-Kala, K., Mattila-Sandholm, T., Pol, I., Smid, E. J., Gorris, L. G. M., & von Wright, A. (1998) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf980154m · Cited by 1,664
Prevention of Drug Access to Bacterial Targets: Permeability Barriers and Active Efflux
Nikaido, H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8153625 · Cited by 1,540
Mechanisms of antibacterial action of three monoterpenes
Trombetta, D., Castelli, F., Sarpietro, M. G., Venuti, V., Cristani, M., Daniele, C., Saija, A., Mazzanti, G., & Bisignano, G. (2005) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.49.6.2474-2478.2005 · Cited by 1,359
Cited by
Antibacterial properties of propolis
Przybyłek, I., & Karpiński, T. M. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24112047 · Cited by 683
Przeor, M. (2022) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph15010065 · Cited by 93
Gu, D.-T., Tung, T.-H., Jiesisibieke, Z. L., Chien, C.-W., & Liu, W.-Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.790901 · Cited by 54
Comparison of the Biological Potential and Chemical Composition of Brazilian and Mexican Propolis
Silva-Beltrán, N. P., Umsza-Guez, M. A., Ramos Rodrigues, D. M., Gálvez-Ruiz, J. C., de Paula Castro, T. L., & Balderrama-Carmona, A. P. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app112311417 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasconcelos, N. G., Croda, J., & Simionatto, S.
- Venue
- Microbial Pathogenesis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 120
- Pages
- 198-203
- ISSN
- 0882-4010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802672006
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 81
- FWCI
- 26.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial mechanisms of cinnamon and its constituents: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.04.036
- The paper
- Vasconcelos, N. G., Croda, J., & Simionatto, S. (2018). Antibacterial mechanisms of cinnamon and its constituents: A review. Microbial Pathogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.04.036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.