PreprintCited by 155RNA Research and SplicingGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Essential roles for the splicing regulator nSR100/SRRM4 during nervous system development

Open access
Quesnel-Vallières, Mathieu, Irimia, Manuel, Cordes, Sabine P., Blencowe, Benjamin J.·2015·Genes & Development

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) generates vast transcriptomic complexity in the vertebrate nervous system. However, the extent to which trans -acting splicing regulators and their target AS regulatory networks contribute to nervous system development is not well understood. To address these questions, we generated mice lacking the vertebrate- and neural-specific Ser/Arg repeat-related protein of 100 kDa (nSR100/SRRM4). Loss of nSR100 impairs development of the central and peripheral nervous systems in part by disrupting neurite outgrowth, cortical layering in the forebrain, and axon guidance in the corpus callosum. Accompanying these developmental defects are widespread changes in AS that primarily result in shifts to nonneural patterns for different classes of splicing events. The main component of the altered AS program comprises 3- to 27-nucleotide (nt) neural microexons, an emerging class of highly conserved AS events associated with the regulation of protein interaction networks in developing neurons and neurological disorders. Remarkably, inclusion of a 6-nt, nSR100-activated microexon in Unc13b transcripts is sufficient to rescue a neuritogenesis defect in nSR100 mutant primary neurons. These results thus reveal critical in vivo neurodevelopmental functions of nSR100 and further link these functions to a conserved program of neuronal microexon splicing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.256115.114

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Germline deletion of Srrm4 results in fewer Pax6+ cells in the ventricular zone and fewer postmitotic NeuN+ neurons.

    “the germline deletion of Srrm4 results in fewer Pax6+ cells in the ventricular zone and fewer postmitotic NeuN+ neurons35”

    From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Insufficient phrenic innervation to the diaphragm in Srrm4Δ7-8 mice appears to result from reduced secondary branching of motor neuron axons.

    “This appears to result from insufficient phrenic innervation to the diaphragm35, as secondary branching of motor neuron axons in this region is reduced by twofold.”

    From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Srrm4Δ7-8 mice show no gross morphological phenotype during embryonic development, but most die from respiratory failure within a few hours of birth.

    “Srrm4Δ7–8 mice show no gross morphological phenotype during embryonic development, but most die from respiratory failure within a few hours of birth.”

    From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Srrm4−/− mice have fewer late-born, upper-layer neurons and more early-born, lower-layer neurons.

    “Srrm4−/− mice have fewer late-born, upper-layer neurons and more early-born, lower-layer neurons”

    From The neurogenetics of alternative splicing (2016) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quesnel-Vallières, M., Irimia, M., Cordes, S. P., & Blencowe, B. J.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Cordes, Sabine P.
  • Blencowe, Benjamin J.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2015-04-01
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
746-759
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2054177024
Cited by
155
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-67011, MOP-14609, MOP-111199)
  • Human Frontiers Science Program Organization
  • CIHR Banting and Best Scholarship
  • Ontario Graduate Scholarship
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
alternative splicing, brain development, microexons, neurite outgrowth, cortical lamination, axon guidance, corpus callosum, neural development, mouse mutants
MeSH terms
Animals, Embryo, Mammalian, Exons, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred ICR, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Nervous System, RNA Splicing, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review