Allosteric interactions prime androgen receptor dimerization and activation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Summary The androgen receptor (AR) is a steroid receptor and master transcription factor that governs gene expression programs required for luminal development of prostate epithelium, formation of muscle tissue and maintenance of the male phenotype. AR misregulation is a hallmark of multiple malignancies, including prostate cancer, where AR hyperactivation and expansion of its transcriptome occur in part through AR gene amplification and interaction with oncoprotein cofactors. Despite its biological importance, how AR’s individual domains and its protein cofactors cooperate to bind DNA have remained elusive. Using a combination of reconstitution biochemistry and single particle cryo-electron microscopy (EM), we have isolated three conformational states of AR bound to DNA. We observe that AR forms a non-obligate dimer, with the buried dimer interface utilized by related ancestral nuclear receptors repurposed to facilitate cooperative DNA binding. We identify surfaces bridging AR’s domains responsible for allosteric communication, that are compromised in partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS), and are reinforced by AR’s oncoprotein cofactor, ERG, and DNA binding site motifs. Finally, we present evidence that this plastic dimer interface for transcriptional activation may have been adopted by AR at the expense of DNA binding. Our work highlights how fine-tuning of AR’s cooperative interactions translate to consequences in development and disease.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
AR bound to DNA exists as a non-obligate, plastic dimer whose LBD dimer and DBD interfaces allosterically promote cooperative DNA binding and transactivation. ERG and ARE sequence composition reinforce these interactions, especially for partly primed AR, with hinge length tuning the response.
Key findings
- Cryo-EM isolated three DNA-bound AR conformations—Entrenched, Splayed, and Divorced—with resolutions of 11.4, 9.1, and 9.4 Å and 68,581, 53,169, and 51,454 particles, respectively; all share a plastic LBD dimer interface near beta-sheet 1 and helix 5.
- The AR DBD alone bound DNA over fivefold weaker than WT AR, and mutation of LBD dimer-interface residues N759 or R761, individually or together, abrogated DNA binding on both palindromic and half-site AREs.
- ERG altered AR transactivation over twenty times more on an ARE half-site reporter than on a palindromic reporter; ENZ-inhibited AR was similarly more sensitive to ERG than DHT-activated AR.
- Forced AR protomer proximity with an 18-residue linker bound DNA nearly fivefold tighter than WT, while a 27-residue linker bound almost threefold weaker; a long-hinged AR variant showed ERG-induced transactivation differences up to sixtyfold compared with WT.
Methods
- Recombinant N-terminally truncated AR, full-length ERG, and ARE DNA were reconstituted; complexes were cross-linked with Grafix for cryo-EM and with DSSO for cross-linking mass spectrometry, supplemented by atomic force microscopy and negative stain EM.
- DNA binding was measured by gel shift and fluorescence polarization with WT and mutant AR constructs, including DBD-interface and LBD-dimer-interface mutants, hinge variants, and AR-AR linker fusions.
- Transcriptional assays used HEK293T reporter assays with half-site versus palindromic ARE reporters across DHT concentrations and ERG variants; mouse Pten−/− prostate organoids were used for ERG-dependent establishment and gene-expression assays.
Limitations
- Stated: higher-resolution cryo-EM structures of ternary AR–ERG–DNA complexes are needed to define ERG-induced cooperativity, and Grafix cross-linking may have limited resolution or excluded alternative native conformations.
- Evident: the cryo-EM studies used N-terminally truncated AR rather than full-length AR, and ERG’s PNT and ETS domains could not be resolved in the structures; the authors note the ERG–AR interaction may be transient and that some captured states may lack ERG.
- Evident: the structural models are low-to-moderate resolution (9.1–11.4 Å), with individual AR LBD and DBD domains docked from X-ray coordinates rather than resolved de novo.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The DBD dimer interface displays conformational plasticity, with the DBD of protomer B rotating progressively away from its LBD in the Splayed and Divorced states.
“the DBD dimer interface also displays conformational plasticity, with the DBD of protomer B rotating progressively away from its LBD in the Splayed and Divorced states”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AR forms a non-obligate dimer when bound to DNA.
“showing AR forms a non-obligate dimer”
- Also stated in: § Global architecture of DNA-bound AR · plain
“The fact that AR exists as a non-obligate dimer when bound to DNA is in stark contrast to AnSRs and type II NRs, whose LBDs are sufficient for dimerization at a distinct yet conserved interface”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Global architecture of DNA-bound AR · plain
- Findingown data
AR bound to DNA adopts three distinct conformations: Entrenched, Splayed, and Divorced.
“we isolated three distinct states of AR bound to DNA from this complex mixture that exhibited Entrenched, Splayed and Divorced architectures”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“we isolated three conformations of AR bound to DNA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
The two DBDs in all three AR-DNA models adopt a head-to-head conformation previously reported for the AR DBD dimer bound to non-palindromic ARE repeats.
“Density for the two DBDs in all three models are consistent with the head-to-head conformation previously reported in the X-ray structure of the AR DBD dimer bound to non-palindromic ARE repeats”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shaffer et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The three AR-DNA conformations differ in plasticity around a common LBD dimer interface near beta-sheet 1 and helix 5.
“The most striking difference defining these states is plasticity around a common LBD dimer interface that converges at a prominent surface near beta-sheet 1 and helix 5 of the LBD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
All three AR-DNA models share a common LBD dimerization interface.
“While all three models share this common dimerization interface”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The distance between the LBD and DBD of one AR protomer can be accommodated by the 42-residue disordered Hinge in all three models.
“the distance between the LBD and DBD of one protomer can be accommodated by the length of the 42 residue disordered Hinge in all three of the models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The two most enriched cross-linked lysines in the AR DBD, K590 and K592, comprise part of the lever arm.
“the two most enriched cross-linked lysines in the DBD, K590 and K592, comprise part of the “lever arm,””
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Organoid establishment and gene expression were more pronounced under conditions favoring low AR activity, either through ENZ treatment or DHT withdrawal.
“organoid establishment and gene expression were more pronounced under conditions favoring low AR activity, either through ENZ treatment or DHT withdrawal”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
3K-SR hinges have on average the longest hinge lengths among NR family members.
“3K-SR hinges have on average the longest hinge lengths among NR family members”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
XL-MS identified candidate surfaces responsible for interdomain and intermolecular cooperativity in AR.
“we performed cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) with the lysine cross-linker disuccinimidyl sulfoxide (DSSO) to identify candidate surfaces responsible for interdomain and intermolecular cooperativity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ERG had a pronounced effect on mutant AR transactivation on the half site reporter relative to WT, particularly when DHT concentrations were limiting.
“ERG had a pronounced effect on mutant AR transactivation on the half site reporter relative to WT, particularly when DHT concentrations were limiting”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mutation of N759 or R761 at the AR LBD dimer interface, individually or together, abrogated DNA binding on both ARE palindromic and half site DNA.
“Mutation of N759 or R761 at the dimer interface, individually or together, abrogated DNA binding on both ARE palindromic and half site DNA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The gain-of-function conferred by the short hinge was less pronounced on half site compared to full palindromic DNA.
“the gain-of-function conferred by the short hinge was less pronounced on half site compared to full palindromic DNA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both hinge variants displayed impaired activity compared to WT AR in cells.
“Although both hinge variants displayed impaired activity compared to WT AR”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Covalent cross-linking (Grafix) allowed trapping and resolving three conformational states of AR bound to DNA representing a continuum of AR activation based on the extent of engagement among allosteric surfaces.
“covalent cross-linking (Grafix) allowed us to trap and resolve three conformational states of AR bound to DNA representing a continuum of AR activation based on the extent of engagement among these allosteric surfaces”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Perturbation of AR DBD interface residues including the basic loop KRK 845-847, R854, and K861 abrogated DNA binding.
“as did perturbation of residues at the DBD interface, including the basic loop KRK 845-847, R854, and K861”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ERG stimulated the AR variant with a long hinge more on half site DNA.
“ERG stimulated the AR variant with a long hinge more on half site DNA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ERG altered AR transactivation over twenty times more on the ARE half site reporter compared to the palindromic sequence.
“ERG altered AR transactivation over twenty times more on the ARE half site reporter compared to the palindromic sequence”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ERG effects between WT and mutant AR were virtually indistinguishable on the palindromic reporter.
“ERG effects between WT and mutants were virtually indistinguishable on the palindromic reporter”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Hinge length did not impact ERG modulation on the palindromic reporter.
“hinge length did not impact ERG modulation on the palindromic reporter”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AR transactivation was significantly impaired by both LBD dimer-interface and DBD-interface mutations on the half site reporter.
“AR transactivation was significantly impaired by both classes of LBD mutations (dimer and DBD interfaces) on the half site reporter”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only AR DBD interface mutants showed appreciable transcriptional defects on the palindromic reporter.
“Conversely, only the DBD interface mutants showed appreciable transcriptional defects on the palindromic reporter”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ENZ-inhibited AR was more sensitive to ERG than DHT-activated AR.
“ENZ-inhibited AR was similarly more sensitive to ERG than DHT-activated AR”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The buried dimer interface utilized by ancestral steroid receptors is repurposed in AR to facilitate cooperative DNA binding.
“with the buried dimer interface utilized by ancestral steroid receptors repurposed to facilitate cooperative DNA binding”
- Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
“distinct from the constitutive dimerization interface shared among AnSRs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
DNA sequence is not sufficient to induce uniform dimerization between AR DBDs or LBDs.
“That the DBDs display such flexibility when bound to palindromic ARE DNA suggests DNA sequence is not sufficient to induce uniform dimerization between the DBDs or the LBDs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Disruption of interdomain allostery in AR translates to subtle yet pathological consequences in PAIS.
“these PAIS mutants are examples of how disruption of interdomain allostery translates to more subtle yet pathological consequences”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
When AR is partly primed through limiting ligand or compromised allosteric interactions, DNA consensus repeats can directly promote 3K-SR dimerization.
“suggesting that when AR is partly primed through limiting ligand or compromised allosteric interactions, DNA consensus repeats can directly promote 3K-SR dimerization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The Hinge directly contributes to the dynamic states of AR.
“The Hinge also directly contributes to these dynamic states.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Additional surfaces within the AR LBD likely contribute to cooperative DNA binding.
“and that additional surfaces within the LBD likely contribute to cooperative DNA binding”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cooperativity conferred through AR LBD allosteric surfaces enables transactivation of weak AREs.
“suggesting that the cooperativity conferred through LBD allosteric surfaces enables transactivation of weak AREs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The AR Hinge has expanded in length over evolution to broadly promote transactivation, rather than maintain higher DNA binding affinities through increased steric constraints.
“Our data suggest that this region has expanded in length over evolution to broadly promote transactivation, rather than maintain higher DNA binding affinities through increased steric constraints.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Forced proximity enhances interdomain cooperativity in AR.
“These results support a model where forced proximity enhances interdomain cooperativity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The distance between AR protomers critically impacts DNA binding affinity.
“Thus, the distance between AR protomers critically impacts DNA binding affinity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A plastic dimer interface would allow cofactors such as ERG to push the conformational equilibrium and fine tune partly primed AR dimers or potential monomers through a graded rheostat mechanism, rather than an on-off switch.
“A plastic dimer interface would allow cofactors, such as ERG, to push this conformational equilibrium and fine tune partly primed AR dimers or potential monomers through a graded rheostat mechanism, rather than an on-off switch.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Germline mutations within the AR dimer (N759 and R761) and DBD interfaces (R846 and R854) have been detected in individuals presenting with PAIS.
“germline mutations within the dimer (N759 and R761) and DBD interfaces (R846 and R854) have been detected in individuals presenting with PAIS”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
- May combine two claims. 31
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe Entrenched state is the most compact and best fits the X-ray structure of an LBD dimer, whereas the Divorced state deviates most.
“the Entrenched state is the most compact, exhibiting the best fit for the X-ray structure of a LBD dimer (Nadal et al., 2017), whereas the extended conformation in the Divorced state deviates the most”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nadal et al., 2017 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWT ERG significantly repressed both GR and MR transactivation, while AIM and DNA binding mutants were far less potent.
“WT ERG significantly repressed both GR and MR transactivation, while the AIM and DNA binding mutants were far less potent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataERG was detected in the AR complexes by XL-MS, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, but features corresponding to ERG's PNT and ETS domains could not be resolved in the structures.
“while ERG is detected in our complexes by XL-MS, SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting (Fig. 3A, Fig. S3A, Fig. S11A, B), we could not resolve features in our structures corresponding to ERG’s PNT and ETS domains”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataShort- and long-hinged AR variants exhibited gain- and loss-of-function in DNA binding relative to WT, respectively, and the short-hinged variant failed to be stimulated by ERG.
“the short- and long-hinged variants exhibited gain- and loss-of-function in DNA binding relative to WT, respectively, while the short-hinged variant failed to be stimulated by ERG”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ERG ETS domain and mutants that fail to interact with AR or DNA largely phenocopied the empty vector, corroborating XL-MS data showing surfaces outside the ETS domain interact with the LBD.
“In contrast, the ERG ETS domain and mutants that fail to interact with AR or with DNA (Wasmuth et al., 2020) largely phenocopied the empty vector (Fig. 3B, Fig. S11E), corroborating the XL-MS data showing surfaces outside the ETS domain interact with the LBD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wasmuth et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFL ERG repressed activity of an AR variant lacking the N-terminus but exerted no effect on AR V7.
“FL ERG repressed activity of an AR variant lacking the N-terminus, but exerted no effect on AR V7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataK861 is the most enriched cross-linked lysine in the AR LBD and features prominently in interdomain contacts with the DBD.
“K861, the most enriched cross-linked lysine in the LBD, features prominently in the network of interdomain contacts with the DBD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOverexpression of WT ERG but not AIM or DNA binding mutants promoted organoid formation and expression of luminal marker and AR-ERG co-dependent genes.
“Overexpression of WT ERG but not AIM or DNA binding mutants promoted organoid formation as well as expression of luminal marker and AR-ERG co-dependent genes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe lever arm lysines primarily cross-link to LBD residues K861 and K847, which are in close proximity in both protomers of the Entrenched model and one protomer of the Divorced model.
“the “lever arm” lysines primarily cross-link to LBD residues K861 and K847, with these two surfaces in close proximity in both protomers of the Entrenched model, and in one protomer of the Divorced model”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe final cryo-EM reconstructions for the Entrenched, Splayed, and Divorced states consist of 68,581, 53,169, and 51,454 particles, with resolutions of 11.4, 9.1, and 9.4 Å, respectively.
“The final Entrenched, Splayed, and Divorced reconstructions consist of 68,581, 53,169, and 51,454 particles, with resolutions of 11.4, 9.1, and 9.4 Å, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe AR DBD alone bound DNA over fivefold weaker than wild-type AR and failed to produce DNA supershifts characteristic of WT AR.
“we also assayed the DBD alone, which bound DNA over fivefold weaker than wild-type (WT) AR (Fig. 2C) and failed to produce DNA supershifts characteristic of WT AR”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDNA mobility shifts of the AR mutant proteins were highly altered, with the supershifted species in WT lost in most mutants and instead resembling that of the DBD.
“DNA mobility shifts of the mutant proteins were highly altered – the supershifted species in WT were lost in most mutants, instead resembling that of the DBD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUsing cryo-EM coupled with XL-MS, two surfaces on the AR LBD were identified that promote DNA binding and AR transactivation: intramolecular contacts with the DBD and a plastic dimer interface between two protomers, distinct from the constitutive dimerization interface shared among AnSRs.
“Using cryo-EM coupled with XL-MS, we identified two surfaces on the LBD that promote DNA binding and AR transactivation, including intramolecular contacts with the DBD and a plastic dimer interface between two protomers, distinct from the constitutive dimerization interface shared among AnSRs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataERG interacted with and enhanced the abilities of the AR LBD mutants to bind DNA.
“ERG interacted with and enhanced the abilities of the AR LBD mutants to bind DNA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe short-hinged AR variant was minimally affected by ERG, whereas ERG induced up to a sixty-fold difference in transactivation in the long-hinged variant compared to WT AR.
“we did observe that the short-hinged variant was minimally affected by ERG, consistent with our biochemical observations, whereas ERG induced up to a sixty-fold difference in transactivation in the long-hinged variant compared to WT AR”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe highest scored XL-MS cross-links were at the interface between the AR DBD and LBD, independently validating domain docking and structural observations.
“The highest scored cross-links were at the interface between the AR DBD and LBD, independently validating our domain docking and structural observations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe AR-AR18Linker fusion bound DNA nearly five-fold tighter than WT AR, while the AR-AR27Linker fusion bound DNA almost three-fold weaker.
“the fusion with the shorter of the linkers (AR-AR18Linker) bound DNA nearly five-fold tighter than WT AR, while the fusion with the longer linker (AR-AR27Linker) bound DNA almost three-fold weaker”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the Entrenched model, additional density proximal to the LBDs can accommodate ERG's PNT and ETS domains, consistent with the ERG-AR interface mapped by XL-MS and previous work suggesting ERG interacts with the AR LBD.
“Indeed, in the Entrenched model, we observe additional density proximal to the LBDs that can accommodate ERG’s PNT and ETS domains (Fig. S11C, D) (Mackereth et al., 2004; Regan et al., 2013), consistent with the ERG-AR interface mapped by XL-MS (Fig. 3A, S11A) and our previous work suggesting that ERG interacts with the AR LBD (Wasmuth et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wasmuth et al., 2020 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataComposite PDBs of the ΔNTD AR dimer bound to DNA showed good fit into corresponding cryo-EM density with correlation coefficients of 0.8318, 0.8267, and 0.8717 for the Entrenched, Splayed, and Divorced models, respectively.
“Composite PDBs of the ΔNTD AR dimer bound to DNA showed good fit into corresponding cryo-EM density with correlation coefficients of 0.8318, 0.8267, and 0.8717, for the Entrenched, Splayed, and Divorced models, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe equivalent residue in AnSRs is hydrophobic and buried, forming part of the conserved LBD dimerization helix.
“Notably, the equivalent residue in AnSRs is hydrophobic and buried, forming part of the conserved LBD dimerization helix”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIntramolecular cross-links to AR outnumber intermolecular cross-links to ERG, suggesting the captured states may include AR without ERG.
“the fact that intramolecular cross-links to AR outnumber intermolecular cross-links to ERG suggests we may have captured states without ERG”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe LBD has an integral role in AR dimerization and activation.
“indicating the integral role of the LBD in dimerization and AR activation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataERG-dependent modulation of AR activity depends on the LBD through an interaction conserved in other 3K-SRs and does not require the NTD.
“our findings show that ERG-dependent modulation of AR activity depends on the LBD through an interaction conserved in other 3K-SRs, and unlike other classes of coactivators, does not require the NTD”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yu et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAllosteric LBD interactions in cis with the DBD, or in trans with another LBD or with ERG, can promote AR function.
“The results presented thus far suggest that allosteric LBD interactions in cis with the DBD, or in trans either with another LBD or with ERG, can promote AR function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDirect ARE repeats reinforce, but are not required for, AR dimerization.
“support a model where direct ARE repeats reinforce, but are not required, for AR dimerization”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe cross-linking strategy (Grafix) may have limited overall resolution of the cryo-EM reconstructions and alternative native conformations may exist.
“it is possible that this approach limited overall resolution of our cryo-EM reconstructions and that alternative native conformations may exist”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCryo-EM data coupled with mutagenesis reveals four components directly contribute to AR regulation: LBD allosteric interactions, Hinge length, a full-length LBD-interacting cofactor (ERG), and the composition of the ARE consensus site.
“Our cryo-EM data, coupled with mutagenesis studies, reveals how four components directly contribute to AR regulation: 1) LBD allosteric interactions, 2) Hinge length, 3) a full-length LBD-interacting cofactor (ERG), and 4) the composition of the ARE consensus site”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPten−/−;ERG organoids were confirmed to be GFP positive throughout the duration of the experiment by fluorescence microscopy.
“Pten−/−;ERG organoids were confirmed to be GFP positive throughout the duration of the experiment by fluorescence microscopy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHigh affinity ARE repeats rather than half sites or degenerate AREs can directly increase AR binding to DNA and transactivation by promoting dimerization, boosting AR output when AR is impaired through anti-androgens, low DHT, or mutation of its allosteric surfaces.
“high affinity ARE repeats rather than half sites or degenerate AREs can directly increase AR binding to DNA and transactivation by promoting dimerization, boosting AR output when AR is impaired through anti-androgens, low DHT, or mutation of its allosteric surfaces”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe 3K-SR family replaced a hydrophobic dimer interface with polar residues, abandoning a constitutive dimerization mechanism for a tunable one.
“In contrast, the 3K-SR family replaced this hydrophobic dimer interface with polar residues, abandoning a constitutive dimerization mechanism for a tunable one”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAll cell lines used in the study were confirmed to be free of mycoplasma.
“All lines were confirmed to be free of mycoplasma.”
- Also stated in: § METHOD DETAILS · plain
“All lines were confirmed to be free of mycoplasma using the Lonza MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (LT07-318).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § METHOD DETAILS · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnSRs exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%).
“AnSRs that exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAR has evolved to tolerate levels of sequence degeneracy for proper development, with enhanced flexibility conferred through a plastic dimer interface and an extended hinge, both serving as regulatory mechanisms that allow AR to bind primarily half sites and other degenerate sequences in vivo.
“AR has evolved in a manner that allows it to tolerate levels of sequence degeneracy for proper development, with this enhanced flexibility conferred through a plastic dimer interface and an extended hinge, both serving as regulatory mechanisms that allow AR to bind primarily half sites and other degenerate sequences in vivo”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataERG cooperative interactions more readily influence partly primed AR through interactions with the LBD by potentially inducing a more compact state, providing proof-of-principle evidence for how overexpression of an AR cofactor can confer ENZ resistance.
“our data suggest that ERG cooperative interactions more readily influence partly primed AR through interactions with the LBD by potentially inducing a more compact state, providing proof-of-principle evidence for how overexpression of an AR cofactor can confer ENZ resistance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDNA binding fluorescence polarization experiments were performed in triplicate.
“Data from triplicate experiments was analyzed, and when applicable a model for receptor depletion was used to calculate apparent Kd values with Prism, GraphPad Software.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataOrganoid establishment assay data were analyzed from an average of 8 replicate wells.
“Data from an average of 8 replicate wells were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, with ****P<0.0001; n.s. (not significant), P>0.05.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataDNA binding fluorescence polarization data were presented as mean ± standard deviation from n=4 experiments.
“Data presented as mean +/− standard deviation from n=4 experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe ARE repeat reporter (4X-ARE, firefly luciferase) has been previously described.
“The ARE repeat reporter (4X-ARE, firefly luciferase) has been previously described (Tran et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tran et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductown dataOrganoid establishment assay data were presented as mean ± standard deviation from n=3 experiments.
“Data presented as mean +/− standard deviation from n=3 experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe AR region 652-671 is distal from the bipartite nuclear localization sequence previously implicated in DNA binding and acetylation.
“For AR Hinge variants, residues of unknown function proximal to the LBD (652-671) were excised, as this region is distal from the bipartite nuclear localization sequence previously implicated in DNA binding and acetylation (Haelens et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haelens et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenqPCR data were presented as mean ± standard deviation from n=3 experiments.
“Data presented as mean +/− standard deviation from n=3 experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe half site ARE reporter is derived from the minimal rat probasin sequence.
“The half site ARE reporter is derived from the minimal rat probasin sequence (Zhang et al., 2000) and was cloned into pGL3 via KpnI and NcoI restriction sites (Promega).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPten−/−;sgERG organoids were previously generated by electroporation of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes against ERG.
“Pten−/−;sgERG organoids previously generated by electroporation of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes against ERG (Feng et al., 2021) were transduced with an empty vector control, or an allelic series of WT and mutant ERG variants and selected with 2 μg/mL puromycin for 1 week.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Feng et al., 2021 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAR reporter assay data were presented as mean ± standard deviation from n=3 experiments.
“Data presented as mean +/− standard deviation from n=3 experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PTGES3 addition appears to chaperone DNA binding of AR, restricting formation of heterogenous complexes.
“PTGES3 addition appears to chaperone DNA binding of AR, restricting formation of heterogenous complexes50 as observed by mass photometry (Fig. 4j).”
From Genome-scale CRISPR screens identify PTGES3 as a direct modulator of androgen receptor function in advanced prostate cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [50]
The Results section, “ERG chaperones AR to promote DNA binding” (page unavailable), reports that ERG promotes AR binding to DNA and prevents AR oligomerization. That supports the general chaperoning idea, but the cited paper attributes the effect to ERG, not PTGES3; it does not establish the claimed effect of PTGES3 addition. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Conflicting descriptions of LBD contacts in the Divorced state
MajorThe paper says all three models share a common LBD dimerization interface, but later says the Divorced conformation lacks dimeric contacts between the LBDs. Those statements give conflicting accounts of a central structural finding.
“While all three models share this common dimerization interface”
“the Divorced conformation lacks dimeric contacts between the AR LBDs in contrast to the Splayed and Entrenched conformations”
The three reconstructions do not have equal particle counts
MinorThe Results describe an equal number of unique particles among the three models, but the Methods give counts of 68,581, 53,169, and 51,454. The largest count is about one-third greater than the smallest.
“with equal number of unique particles among the models”
“The final Entrenched, Splayed, and Divorced reconstructions consist of 68,581, 53,169, and 51,454 particles”
Cites
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Couch, G. S., Greenblatt, D. M., Meng, E. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20084 · Cited by 45,260 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Individual domains of the AR LBD and DBD were manually docked into respective EM maps and subject to rigid body refinement in Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004) using the PDB coordinates for the AR LBD (1XOW) (He et al.”
MethodMUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
Edgar, R. C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340 · Cited by 44,662 · cited 1× · see citing works
“S11L, M) (Edgar, 2004), we queried whether ERG could modulate other 3K-SRs, including the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and GR, as the latter can bypass AR blockade to drive ENZ resistance in CRPC (Arora et al.”
BackgroundFeatures and development of Coot
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G., & Cowtan, K. D. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444910007493 · Cited by 27,510 · see citing works
UCSF ChimeraX : Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Meng, E. C., Couch, G. S., Croll, T. I., Morris, J. H., & Ferrin, T. E. (2020) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3943 · Cited by 9,327 · see citing works
cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J., & Brubaker, M. A. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4169 · Cited by 9,168 · see citing works
MotionCor2 - anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy
Zheng, S., Palovcak, E. J., Armache, J., Verba, K., Cheng, Y.-F., & Agard, D. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4193 · Cited by 7,678 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Frames were motion-corrected using MotionCor2 (Zheng et al., 2017) and the contrast transfer function estimated using CTFFIND4 (Rohou and Grigorieff, 2015).”
MethodCTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs
Rohou, A. L., & Grigorieff, N. (2015) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 · Cited by 4,926 · see citing works
New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3
Zivanov, J., Nakane, T., Forsberg, B., Kimanius, D., Hagen, W., Lindahl, E., & Scheres, S. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.42166 · Cited by 4,377 · see citing works
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Robinson, D., Van Allen, E. M., Wu, Y.-M., Schultz, N., Lonigro, R. J., Mosquera, J.-M., Montgomery, B., Taplin, M.-E., Pritchard, C. C., Attard, G., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001 · Cited by 3,645 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer
Abeshouse, A. A., Ahn, J., Akbani, R., Ally, A., Amin, S. B., Andry, C., Annala, M., Aprikian, A. G., Armenia, J., Arora, A., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.025 · Cited by 3,081 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Driven by the biology of ETS transcription factor translocations in prostate cancer (Cancer Genome Atlas Research, 2015; Chen et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2010), we introduced the oncoprotein ERG into this system and demonstrated ERG is a bonafide AR cofactor, endowed with a LXXLL-like AR interacting motif (AIM) that can…”
BackgroundMethodAndrogen receptor gene mutations in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy
Spada, A. L., Wilson, E. M., Lubahn, D. B., Harding, A., & Fischbeck, K. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/352077a0 · Cited by 2,801 · see citing works
Development of a second-generation antiandrogen for treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
Tran, C., Ouk, S., Clegg, N. J., Chen, Y., Watson, P. A., Arora, V., Wongvipat, J., Smith-Jones, P. M., Yoo, D., Kwon, A., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168175 · Cited by 2,292 · cited 8× · see citing works
“—The ARE repeat reporter (4X-ARE, firefly luciferase) has been previously described (Tran et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEmerging mechanisms of resistance to androgen receptor inhibitors in prostate cancer
Watson, P. A., Arora, V. K., & Sawyers, C. L. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc4016 · Cited by 1,536 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Consistent with our model that partially primed AR is more vulnerable to ERG modulation, we noted organoid establishment and gene expression were more pronounced under conditions favoring low AR activity, either through ENZ treatment or DHT withdrawal (Fig.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM
Wagner, T., Merino, F., Stabrin, M., Moriya, T., Antoni, C., Apelbaum, A., Hagel, P., Sitsel, O., Raisch, T., Prumbaum, D., et al. (2019) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-019-0437-z · Cited by 1,217 · see citing works
Glucocorticoid Receptor Confers Resistance to Antiandrogens by Bypassing Androgen Receptor Blockade
Arora, V. K., Schenkein, E., Murali, R., Subudhi, S. K., Wongvipat, J., Balbas, M., Shah, N., Cai, L., Efstathiou, E., Logothetis, C., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.012 · Cited by 985 · cited 3× · see citing works
“S11L, M) (Edgar, 2004), we queried whether ERG could modulate other 3K-SRs, including the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and GR, as the latter can bypass AR blockade to drive ENZ resistance in CRPC (Arora et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationcisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing
Grant, T. S., Rohou, A. L., & Grigorieff, N. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.35383 · Cited by 879 · see citing works
Yu, J., Yu, J., Mani, R.-S., Cao, Q., Brenner, C. J., Cao, X., Wang, X., Wu, L., Li, J., Hu, M., et al. (2010) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.018 · Cited by 850 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Driven by the biology of ETS transcription factor translocations in prostate cancer (Cancer Genome Atlas Research, 2015; Chen et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2010), we introduced the oncoprotein ERG into this system and demonstrated ERG is a bonafide AR cofactor, endowed with a LXXLL-like AR interacting motif (AIM) that can…”
BackgroundMethodBledsoe, R. K., Montana, V. G., Stanley, T. B., Delves, C. J., Apolito, C. J., McKee, D. D., Consler, T. G., Parks, D. J., Stewart, E. L., Willson, T. M., et al. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00817-6 · Cited by 818 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, the few reported dimeric structures of 3K-SRs exhibit variability around their dimerization interfaces, likely indicative of a low affinity interaction (Bledsoe et al., 2002; Nadal et al., 2017; Williams and Sigler, 1998).”
BackgroundStructure of the intact PPAR-γ–RXR-α nuclear receptor complex on DNA
Chandra, V., Huang, P., Hamuro, Y., Raghuram, S., Wang, Y., Burris, T. P., & Rastinejad, F. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07413 · Cited by 808 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This scenario is in contrast to that of the AnSRs that exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%), even in the presence of oncoprotein cofactors (Arruabarrena-Aristorena et al., 2020; Chandra et al., 2008; Chandra et al., 2013; Chandra et al., 2…”
BackgroundResultIdentification of Multipotent Luminal Progenitor Cells in Human Prostate Organoid Cultures
Karthaus, W. R., Iaquinta, P. J., Drost, J., Gracanin, A., van Boxtel, R., Wongvipat, J., Dowling, C., Gao, D., Begthel, H., Sachs, N., et al. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.017 · Cited by 720 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Mouse prostate organoids were isolated and cultured in Matrigel (Corning) using standard methods (Karthaus et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationWang, Q., Li, W., Liu, X. S., Carroll, J. S., Jänne, O. A., Keeton, E. K., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Pienta, K. J., & Brown, M. A. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.041 · Cited by 689 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, AR’s highly degenerate cistrome is inconsistent with a model whereby dimerization relies on canonical ARE repeats (Massie et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDNA binding site sequence directs glucocorticoid receptor structure and activity
Meijsing, S. H., Pufall, M. A., So, A. Y., Bates, D. L., Chen, L., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1164265 · Cited by 673 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2004) could be due in part to flexibility conferred by the Hinge and the conserved five residue “lever arm,” a loop in the DBD previously identified in GR that permits degeneracy within the DNA consensus motif without altering affinity (Meijsing et al., 2009).”
BackgroundAtomic structure of progesterone complexed with its receptor
Williams, S. P., & Sigler, P. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30775 · Cited by 659 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, the few reported dimeric structures of 3K-SRs exhibit variability around their dimerization interfaces, likely indicative of a low affinity interaction (Bledsoe et al., 2002; Nadal et al., 2017; Williams and Sigler, 1998).”
BackgroundWatson, P. A., Chen, Y. F., Balbas, M. D., Wongvipat, J., Socci, N. D., Viale, A., Kim, K., & Sawyers, C. L. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1012443107 · Cited by 639 · cited 1× · see citing works
“FL ERG repressed activity of an AR variant lacking the N-terminus, but exerted no effect on AR V7, a splice isoform lacking the LBD that is expressed in CRPC patients and associated with anti-androgen resistance (Watson et al., 2010) (Fig.”
BackgroundIntegrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Robinson, D. R., Allen, E. M. V., Wu, Y., Schultz, N. D., Lonigro, R. J., Mosquera, J., Montgomery, B., Taplin, M., Pritchard, C. C., Attard, G., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.053 · Cited by 570 · cited 1× · see citing works
“That these disorders present with a spectrum of physical and molecular phenotypes (Cancer Genome Atlas Research, 2015; Jeske et al., 2007; La Spada et al., 1991; Lee et al., 2019; McPhaul et al., 1992; Robinson et al., 2015) suggests AR can exist in fully and partly primed states.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe nuclear receptor superfamily: A structural perspective
Weikum, E. R., Liu, X., & Ortlund, E. A. (2018) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3496 · Cited by 500 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Nuclear AR binds both palindromic and direct repeats of DNA hexamers known as androgen response elements (AREs) to activate its gene expression program, and is further regulated through association with numerous protein cofactors that bind the NTD or LBD through LXXLL and related motifs (Brooke et al., 2008; Weikum et…”
BackgroundWhole-Genome Cartography of Estrogen Receptor α Binding Sites
Lin, C., Vega, V. B., Thomsen, J. S., Zhang, T., Kong, S. L., Xie, M., Chiu, K. P., Lipovich, L., Barnett, D., Stossi, F., et al. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030087 · Cited by 459 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This scenario is in contrast to that of the AnSRs that exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%), even in the presence of oncoprotein cofactors (Arruabarrena-Aristorena et al., 2020; Chandra et al., 2008; Chandra et al., 2013; Chandra et al., 2…”
ResultStructural basis of androgen receptor binding to selective androgen response elements
Shaffer, P. L., Jivan, A., Dollins, D. E., Claessens, F., & Gewirth, D. T. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0401123101 · Cited by 400 · cited 12× · see citing works
“Whether allosteric surfaces within the 3K-SR LBD contribute to DNA binding remains unclear as structural information has been limited to individual domains (He et al., 2004; Shaffer et al., 2004) or lacks structural features to unambiguously assign DNA or individual domains (Yu et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialPintilie, G. D., Zhang, J., Goddard, T. D., Chiu, W., & Gossard, D. C. (2010) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2010.03.007 · Cited by 388 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Segmentation of individual domains of AR was performed using Segger (Pintilie et al., 2010) in ChimeraX.”
MethodxiNET: cross-link network maps with residue resolution
Combe, C. W., Fischer, L., & Rappsilber, J. (2015) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o114.042259 · Cited by 296 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Crosslinked lysines were depicted in 2D using xiNET cross-link viewer (Combe et al., 2015) and rendered in 3D as solid-colored spheres mapped onto the Entrenched model using PyMol.”
MethodGreschik, H., Wurtz, J., Cianférani, S., Bourguet, W., DORSSELAER, A. V., Moras, D., & Renaud, J. (2002) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00444-6 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
He, B., Gampe, R. T., Kole, A. J., Hnat, A. T., Stanley, T. B., An, G., Stewart, E. L., Kalman, R. I., Minges, J. T., & Wilson, E. M. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.036 · Cited by 291 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Current structural studies suggest that 3K-SRs may have acquired a mechanism of activation distinct from other NRs, as their LBDs most often crystallize as monomers (He et al., 2004), in contrast to ER (Greschik et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGenotype<i>Versus</i>Phenotype in Families with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
Boehmer, A. L. M., Brüggenwirth, H., van Assendelft, C., Otten, B. J., Verleun-Mooijman, M. C. T., Niermeijer, M. F., Brunner, H. G., Rouwé, C. W., Waelkens, J. J., Oostdijk, W., et al. (2001) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.86.9.7825 · Cited by 290 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Notably, germline mutations within the dimer (N759 and R761) and DBD interfaces (R846 and R854) have been detected in individuals presenting with PAIS, underscoring the physiological importance of these surfaces (Boehmer et al., 2001; Jeske et al., 2007; McPhaul et al., 1992).”
BackgroundChen, Y., Chi, P., Rockowitz, S., Iaquinta, P. J., Shamu, T., Shukla, S., Gao, D., Sirota, I., Carver, B. S., Wongvipat, J., et al. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3216 · Cited by 281 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Driven by the biology of ETS transcription factor translocations in prostate cancer (Cancer Genome Atlas Research, 2015; Chen et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2010), we introduced the oncoprotein ERG into this system and demonstrated ERG is a bonafide AR cofactor, endowed with a LXXLL-like AR interacting motif (AIM) that can…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationNew androgen receptor genomic targets show an interaction with the ETS1 transcription factor
Massie, C. E., Adryan, B., Barbosa‐Morais, N. L., Lynch, A. G., Tran, M. G., Neal, D. E., & Mills, I. G. (2007) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401046 · Cited by 259 · cited 4× · see citing works
“However, AR’s highly degenerate cistrome is inconsistent with a model whereby dimerization relies on canonical ARE repeats (Massie et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialGraFix: Stabilization of Fragile Macromolecular Complexes for Single Particle Cryo-EM
Stark, H. (2010) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(10)81005-5 · Cited by 246 · cited 2× · see citing works
“To enrich for and identify productively bound AR complexes, we performed gentle cross-linking during ultracentrifugation (Stark, 2010) followed by a combination of AFM, negative stain and single particle cryo-EM to screen individual fractions (Fig.”
MethodThe Homeodomain Protein HOXB13 Regulates the Cellular Response to Androgens
Norris, J., Chang, C.-Y., Wittmann, B. M., Kunder, R., Cui, H.-X. N., Fan, D.-J., Joseph, J., & McDonnell, D. (2009) · Molecules and Cells · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.020 · Cited by 227 · cited 1× · see citing works
“progression by redistributing AR binding from higher affinity ARE repeats to lower affinity half sites or degenerate sequences (Chen et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2014; Mao et al., 2019; Norris et al., 2009).”
BackgroundZhang, J., Thomas, T. Z., Kasper, S., & Matusik, R. J. (2000) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo.141.12.7837 · Cited by 219 · cited 2× · see citing works
“S10C) and measured their ability to activate reporters with either degenerate (half-site) or palindromic ARE sequences (Huang et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodSchaufele, F., Carbonell, X., Guerbadot, M., Borngraeber, S., Chapman, M. S., Ma, A. A. K., Miner, J. N., & Diamond, M. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408819102 · Cited by 208 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Regulation of AR is multimodal, with androgen binding, relief of NTD-mediated autoinhibition, and NTD-cofactor interactions all contributing to AR activation (He et al., 2001; He et al., 2004; Schaufele et al., 2005; Wasmuth et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialMultidomain integration in the structure of the HNF-4α nuclear receptor complex
Chandra, V., Huang, P., Potluri, N., Wu, D., Kim, Y., & Rastinejad, F. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11966 · Cited by 206 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This scenario is in contrast to that of the AnSRs that exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%), even in the presence of oncoprotein cofactors (Arruabarrena-Aristorena et al., 2020; Chandra et al., 2008; Chandra et al., 2013; Chandra et al., 2…”
BackgroundResultStructure of the homodimeric androgen receptor ligand-binding domain
Nadal, M., Prekovic, S., Gallastegui, N., Helsen, C., Abella, M., Zielinska, K., Gay, M., Vilaseca, M., Taulès, M., Houtsmuller, A. B., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14388 · Cited by 193 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While all three models share this common dimerization interface, the Entrenched state is the most compact, exhibiting the best fit for the X-ray structure of a LBD dimer (Nadal et al., 2017), whereas the extended conformation in the Divorced state deviates the most (Fig.”
BackgroundCooperativity and equilibrium with FOXA1 define the androgen receptor transcriptional program
Jin, H., Zhao, J. C., Wu, L., Kim, J., & Yu, J. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4972 · Cited by 184 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While many of these sites are not normally associated with active transcription, the overexpression of AR cofactors in prostate cancer is thought to activate expression of pro-proliferative genes at these lower affinity degenerate sites (Chen et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017; Mao et al., 2019; Wasmuth…”
BackgroundStructural Insights of Transcriptionally Active, Full-Length Androgen Receptor Coactivator Complexes
Yu, X., Yi, P., Hamilton, R. A., Shen, H., Chen, M., Foulds, C. E., Mancini, M. A., Ludtke, S. J., Wang, Z., & O’Malley, B. W. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.031 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Huang, W., Shostak, Y., Tarr, P. T., Sawyers, C. L., & Carey, M. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.36.25756 · Cited by 154 · cited 1× · see citing works
“S10C) and measured their ability to activate reporters with either degenerate (half-site) or palindromic ARE sequences (Huang et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationHaelens, A., Tanner, T., Denayer, S., Callewaert, L., & Claessens, F. (2007) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-1701 · Cited by 153 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For AR Hinge variants, residues of unknown function proximal to the LBD (652-671) were excised, as this region is distal from the bipartite nuclear localization sequence previously implicated in DNA binding and acetylation (Haelens et al., 2007).”
BackgroundStepwise androgen receptor dimerization
van Royen, M. E., van Cappellen, W. A., de Vos, C., Houtsmuller, A. B., & Trapman, J. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.096792 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
McPhaul, M. J., Marcelli, M., Zoppi, S., Wilson, C. M., Griffin, J. E., & Wilson, J. D. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci116093 · Cited by 140 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Notably, germline mutations within the dimer (N759 and R761) and DBD interfaces (R846 and R854) have been detected in individuals presenting with PAIS, underscoring the physiological importance of these surfaces (Boehmer et al., 2001; Jeske et al., 2007; McPhaul et al., 1992).”
BackgroundHe, B., Bowen, N. T., Minges, J. T., & Wilson, E. M. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m107492200 · Cited by 139 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Regulation of AR is multimodal, with androgen binding, relief of NTD-mediated autoinhibition, and NTD-cofactor interactions all contributing to AR activation (He et al., 2001; He et al., 2004; Schaufele et al., 2005; Wasmuth et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2020).”
BackgroundA hydrophobic ratchet entrenches molecular complexes
Hochberg, G. K. A., Liu, Y., Marklund, E. G., Metzger, B. P. H., Laganowsky, A., & Thornton, J. W. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-3021-2 · Cited by 134 · cited 4× · see citing works
“The fact that AR exists as a non-obligate dimer when bound to DNA is in stark contrast to AnSRs and type II NRs, whose LBDs are sufficient for dimerization at a distinct yet conserved interface (see below) (Hochberg et al., 2020; Weikum et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialArruabarrena-Aristorena, A., Maag, J. L. V., Kittane, S., Cai, Y., Karthaus, W. R., Ladewig, E., Park, J., Kannan, S., Ferrando, L., Cocco, E., et al. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.003 · Cited by 130 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This scenario is in contrast to that of the AnSRs that exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%), even in the presence of oncoprotein cofactors (Arruabarrena-Aristorena et al., 2020; Chandra et al., 2008; Chandra et al., 2013; Chandra et al., 2…”
ResultWilson, S., Qi, J., & Filipp, F. V. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep32611 · Cited by 126 · cited 4× · see citing works
“However, AR’s highly degenerate cistrome is inconsistent with a model whereby dimerization relies on canonical ARE repeats (Massie et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007; Wilson et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialGenotype Versus Phenotype in Families with Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome
Boehmer, A. L. M. (2001) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.86.9.4151 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Evolution of DNA specificity in a transcription factor family produced a new gene regulatory module
McKeown, A. N., Bridgham, J. T., Anderson, D. W., Murphy, M. N., Ortlund, E. A., & Thornton, J. W. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.003 · Cited by 107 · cited 2× · see citing works
“2F), suggesting that when AR is partly primed through limiting ligand or compromised allosteric interactions, DNA consensus repeats can directly promote 3K-SR dimerization (Hochberg et al., 2020; McKeown et al., 2014).”
BackgroundThe hinge region in androgen receptor control
Clinckemalie, L., Vanderschueren, D., Boonen, S., & Claessens, F. (2012) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2012.02.019 · Cited by 104 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To model the shortest (HNF-4α, a type II NR) and longest (MR) known NR hinges, we altered AR’s 42 residue Hinge by 20 amino acids in regions of uncharacterized function (Clinckemalie et al., 2012) (Fig.”
BackgroundAdler, A. J., Scheller, A., & Robins, D. M. (1993) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.13.10.6326 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
The quaternary architecture of RARβ–RXRα heterodimer facilitates domain–domain signal transmission
Chandra, V., Wu, D., Li, S., Potluri, N., Kim, Y., & Rastinejad, F. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00981-y · Cited by 89 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This scenario is in contrast to that of the AnSRs that exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%), even in the presence of oncoprotein cofactors (Arruabarrena-Aristorena et al., 2020; Chandra et al., 2008; Chandra et al., 2013; Chandra et al., 2…”
BackgroundResultBrooke, G. N., Parker, M. G., & Bevan, C. L. (2008) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210955 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nuclear AR binds both palindromic and direct repeats of DNA hexamers known as androgen response elements (AREs) to activate its gene expression program, and is further regulated through association with numerous protein cofactors that bind the NTD or LBD through LXXLL and related motifs (Brooke et al., 2008; Weikum et…”
BackgroundLiu, S., Kumari, S., Hu, Q., Senapati, D., Venkadakrishnan, V. B., Wang, D., DePriest, A. D., Schlanger, S. E., Ben‐Salem, S., Valenzuela, M. M., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.28482 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While many of these sites are not normally associated with active transcription, the overexpression of AR cofactors in prostate cancer is thought to activate expression of pro-proliferative genes at these lower affinity degenerate sites (Chen et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017; Mao et al., 2019; Wasmuth…”
BackgroundDiversity in Structure and Function of the Ets Family PNT Domains
Mackereth, C. D., Schärpf, M., Gentile, L. N., MacIntosh, S. E., Slupsky, C. M., & McIntosh, L. P. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.094 · Cited by 67 · cited 1× · see citing works
“S11C, D) (Mackereth et al., 2004; Regan et al., 2013), consistent with the ERG-AR interface mapped by XL-MS (Fig.”
Sahu, B., Pihlajamaa, P., Dubois, V., Kerkhofs, S., Claessens, F., & Jänne, O. A. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1401 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Huang, W., Peng, Y., Kiselar, J., Zhao, X., Albaqami, A., Mendez, D. C., Chen, Y., Chakravarthy, S., Gupta, S., Ralston, C. Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06034-2 · Cited by 60 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This scenario is in contrast to that of the AnSRs that exist as obligate dimers, exhibit less flexibility, and maintain binding to repeat consensus sequences in vivo (70%), even in the presence of oncoprotein cofactors (Arruabarrena-Aristorena et al., 2020; Chandra et al., 2008; Chandra et al., 2013; Chandra et al., 2…”
BackgroundResultRegan, M. C., Horanyi, P. S., Pryor, E. E., Sarver, J. L., Cafiso, D. S., & Bushweller, J. H. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1301726110 · Cited by 54 · cited 1× · see citing works
“S11C, D) (Mackereth et al., 2004; Regan et al., 2013), consistent with the ERG-AR interface mapped by XL-MS (Fig.”
Wasmuth, E. V., Hoover, E. A., Antar, A., Klinge, S., Chen, Y., & Sawyers, C. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1922159117 · Cited by 50 · cited 10× · see citing works
“intrinsically disordered, is not necessary for ERG association and cooperative stimulation, and contributes to N-C autoinhibition in the absence of NTD-cofactor association (He et al., 2001; Schaufele et al., 2005; van Royen et al., 2012; Wasmuth et al., 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationERG orchestrates chromatin interactions to drive prostate cell fate reprogramming
Li, F., Yuan, Q., Di, W., Xia, X., Liu, Z., Mao, N., Li, L., Li, C., He, J., Li, Y., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci137967 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Adler, A. J., Scheller, A., & Robins, D. M. (1993) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.13.10.6326-6335.1993 · Cited by 35 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AR can tolerate higher levels of sequence degeneracy within its ARE, an important feature required for normal development, and a unique feature among steroid receptors (Adler et al., 1993; Sahu et al., 2014), with 70% of its cistrome comprised of half-sites and up to 99% exhibiting some level of degeneracy (Massie et…”
BackgroundLee, E., Wongvipat, J., Choi, D., Wang, P., Lee, Y. S., Zheng, D., Watson, P. A., Gopalan, A., & Sawyers, C. L. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41913 · Cited by 26 · cited 2× · see citing works
“That these disorders present with a spectrum of physical and molecular phenotypes (Cancer Genome Atlas Research, 2015; Jeske et al., 2007; La Spada et al., 1991; Lee et al., 2019; McPhaul et al., 1992; Robinson et al., 2015) suggests AR can exist in fully and partly primed states.”
BackgroundSelf-citationRapid interrogation of cancer cell of origin through CRISPR editing
Feng, W., Cao, Z., Lim, P. X., Zhao, H., Luo, H., Mao, N., Lee, Y. S., Rivera, A. A., Choi, D., Wu, C., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2110344118 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Pten−/−;sgERG organoids previously generated by electroporation of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes against ERG (Feng et al., 2021) were transduced with an empty vector control, or an allelic series of WT and mutant ERG variants and selected with 2 μg/mL puromycin for 1 week.”
MethodSelf-citationMao, N., Gao, D., Hu, W., Hieronymus, H., Wang, S., Lee, Y. S., Lee, C., Choi, D., Gopalan, A., Chen, Y., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-18-1386 · Cited by 19 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While many of these sites are not normally associated with active transcription, the overexpression of AR cofactors in prostate cancer is thought to activate expression of pro-proliferative genes at these lower affinity degenerate sites (Chen et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017; Mao et al., 2019; Wasmuth…”
BackgroundJeske, Y. W. A., McGown, I. N., Cowley, D. M., Oley, C., Thomsett, M. J., Choong, C. S., & Cotterill, A. M. (2007) · Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1515/jpem.2007.20.8.893 · Cited by 13 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Notably, germline mutations within the dimer (N759 and R761) and DBD interfaces (R846 and R854) have been detected in individuals presenting with PAIS, underscoring the physiological importance of these surfaces (Boehmer et al., 2001; Jeske et al., 2007; McPhaul et al., 1992).”
BackgroundChen, F., Chen, X., Jiang, F., Leng, F., Liu, W. Y., Gui, Y., & Yu, J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-68731-7 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jeske, Y. W. A., Mcgown, I. N., Cowley, D. M., et al. (2007) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Structural Insights of Transcriptionally Active, Full-Length Androgen Receptor Coactivator ComplexesPreprint
Yu, X., Yi, P., Hamilton, R. A., et al. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3578148 · Cited by 2 · cited 13× · see citing works
“Driven by the biology of ETS transcription factor translocations in prostate cancer (Cancer Genome Atlas Research, 2015; Chen et al., 2013; Yu et al., 2010), we introduced the oncoprotein ERG into this system and demonstrated ERG is a bonafide AR cofactor, endowed with a LXXLL-like AR interacting motif (AIM) that can…”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Targeting the Androgen Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer
Dai, C. S., Dehm, S. M., & Sharifi, N. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.23.00433 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Zhang, F., Biswas, M., Massah, S., Lee, J., Lingadahalli, S., Wong, S. T. S., Wells, C. A., Foo, J., Khan, N., Morin, H., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1158 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“The direct interaction between the AR and ERG oncogene has recently been confirmed by a report of the cryo-EM structure elucidating this interaction (52).”
BackgroundVitamin D and Its Receptor from a Structural Perspective
Rochel, N. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14142847 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“The 3D structures of several NRs truncated by their NTDs and in complex with DNA have now been obtained by X-ray crystallography or cryoEM for PPAR–RXR [61], HNF4 [62], LXR–RXR [63], RAR–RXR [64], EcR–USP [65] and AR [66].”
BackgroundJin, P., Duan, X., Huang, Z., Dong, Y., Zhu, J., Guo, H., Tian, H., Zou, C., & Xie, K. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02270-3 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“76 The LBD is located at the receptor ’ s C-terminus and contains 220--250 AAs.”
Chen, L., Zhang, Z., Han, Q., et al. (2023) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.08.027 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Ming, A., Wang, J., Chen, W., & Fang, Z. (2024) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107234 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Retinoic acid receptor structures: the journey from single domains to full-length complex
Rastinejad, F. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/jme-22-0113 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“There is also now clear evidence now in both the AR homodimer DNA complex and the ER homodimer DNA complex for DBD–LBD interactions (Huang et al. 2018, Wasmuth et al. 2022).”
BackgroundInfluentialWang, J., Park, K., Yu, X., Gong, W., Earp, H. S., Wang, G. G., Jin, J. J., & Cai, L. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac861 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Amplification of the AR gene, mutation of AR’s ligand-binding domain (LBD) and/or AR cofactordirected mechanisms can lead to a hyperactive AR signaling during prostate tumorigenesis (5,6); in addition, the AR gene undergoes alternative splicing with inclusion of cryptic exons in CRPC, giving rise to the truncated, hor…”
BackgroundVan-Duyne, G., Blair, I. A., Sprenger, C. C. T., Moiseenkova‐Bell, V. Y., Plymate, S. R., & Penning, T. M. (2023) · Vitamins and hormones · doi:10.1016/bs.vh.2023.01.001 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Quaternary glucocorticoid receptor structure highlights allosteric interdomain communication
Postel, S., Wissler, L., Johansson, C. A., Gunnarsson, A., Gordon, E., Collins, B., Castaldo, M., Köhler, C., Öling, D., Johansson, P., et al. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00914-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The protein architecture and allosteric landscape of HNF4α
Rastinejad, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1219092 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…co-crystal structures (PPAR g -RXR a heterodimer, HNF4 a homodimer and RXR a - RAR b heterodimer) by X-ray crystallography, and subsequent NR complex structure determinations consistently fi nd domain-domain contacts and physical interactions within all multi-domain complexes (30, 37, 39, 40, 71).”
Allosteric communications between domains of nuclear receptors
Rastinejad, F. (2024) · Steroids · doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2024.109551 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Alegre‐Martí, A., Jiménez‐Panizo, A., Martínez-Tébar, A., Poulard, C., Peralta-Moreno, M. N., Abella, M., Antón, R. I., Chiñas, M., Eckhard, U., Piulats, J. M., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade2175 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Nuclear receptors: pathophysiological mechanisms and drug targets in liver disease
Dubois, V., Lefèbvre, P., Staels, B., & Eeckhoute, J. (2024) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331741 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…for a refinement of our understanding of NR structure–function relationships, including quaternary structure and interdomain communication, 8 9 hence improving the search for novel ligands/drugs targeting these NRs. 10 However, no ligands have so far been identified for some NRs, which…”
Unveiling the latest insights into Androgen Receptors in Prostate Cancer
Zakari, S., Ekenwaneze, C. C., Amadi, E. C., et al. (2024) · International journal of medical biochemistry/International journal of medical biochemistry : · doi:10.14744/ijmb.2024.93585 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Chukhu, M., Dahiya, U. R., & Heemers, H. V. (2025) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-025-03573-z · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Moreover, using a range of DHT concentrations that partially to fully prime the AR for activity, partially saturated or antagonist-bound AR were most susceptible to regulation by ERG on AR half sites [97].”
Androgen receptor and estrogen receptor variants in prostate and breast cancers
López, J. C. V., Lange, C. A., & Dehm, S. M. (2024) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106522 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Identification of prognostic stemness biomarkers in colon adenocarcinoma drug resistance
Li, Z., Chen, J., Zhu, D., Wang, X., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Lian, Q., & Gu, B. (2022) · BMC Genomic Data · doi:10.1186/s12863-022-01063-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“AR is a nuclear receptor that regulates gene expression programs required for prostate development and male phenotype maintenance [41].”
BackgroundSingle-Sequence, Structure Free Allosteric Residue Prediction with Protein Language ModelsPreprint
Kannan, G. R., Hie, B., & Kim, P. S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.03.616547 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Li, H., Melnyk, J. E., Fu, B. X. H., Shrestha, R., Zhang, M., Sjöström, M., Feng, S., Anderson, J. A., Han, W., Chesner, L. N., et al. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02388-8 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“Structural models of PTGES3 and AR chaperone and DNA-bound complexes were generated using a combination of experimentally derived structural models (PDB: 1XOW; PDB: 1R4I; PDB: 7KRJ) 43,50,67,68 and Alphafold 3 69 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationZheng, S., Hong, Z., Tan, Y., et al. (2024) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/s12964-024-01897-z · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Accumulating evidence has indicated that progression to advanced drug-resistant CRPC involves multiple molecular mechanisms correlated with irregular AR signaling [4, 5].”
BackgroundVela‐Rodríguez, C., Yang, C., Alanen, H. I., Eki, R., Abbas, T., Maksimainen, M. M., Glumoff, T., Duman, R., Wagner, A., Paschal, B. M., et al. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4945 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Given that AR binds to response element DNA as a homodimer (Nadal et al., 2017; Wasmuth et al., 2022), ADP-ribose reading by the oligomeric DTX3L-PARP9 complex should be an efficient mechanism for concentrating ubiquitin E3 ligase activity on AR target genes.”
BackgroundStructural mechanism underlying variations in DNA binding by the androgen receptor
Lee, X. Y., Eynde, W. V., Helsen, C., Willems, H., Peperstraete, K., Block, S. D., Voet, A. R. D., & Claessens, F. (2024) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106499 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“CryoEM structures of full-size AR are revealing how AR dimers interact and recruit coregulators in greater detail, although the resolution of these structures doesn ’ t reach the atomic resolution of our crystal-based structures and no effects of varying DNA sequences has been reported [83,84,85].”
The interconnection between androgen receptor and DNA damage response pathways in prostate cancer
Sands, M., Adams, S. B., Lee, J., Li, M., Wang, M., Walsh, T., Leon, L., Zablah, A., Haerens, M., Liu, Z., et al. (2025) · Current Urology · doi:10.1097/cu9.0000000000000300 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Doamekpor, S. K., Peng, P., Xu, R., Ma, L., Tong, Y., & Tong, L. (2023) · Acta Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology Communications · doi:10.1107/s2053230x23002224 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Helsen, C., Rocca, M. S., Nguyen, T. T., Eerlings, R., Lee, X. Y., Block, S. D., Vinanzi, C., Millo, F. D., Giagulli, V. A., Voet, A. R. D., et al. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4599 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Thanks to a multitude of crystal and solution structures of the DBD and the LBD(Wasmuth et al., 2022) in combination with the cryoEM solution structure of the full AR in complex with SRC-3 and p300 (Yu et al., 2020), the unique head-to-head and tail-to-tail dimerization of the AR has been…”
BackgroundIdentification of an Evolutionarily Conserved Allosteric Network in Steroid Receptors
Dube, N., Khan, S. H., Sasse, R. K., & Okafor, C. D. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01096 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
A carboxy-terminal ubiquitylation site regulates androgen receptor activity
Arai, S., Gao, Y., Yu, Z., Xie, L., Wang, L., Zhang, T., Nouri, M., Chen, S., Asara, J. M., & Balk, S. P. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05709-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Notably, a recent study using cryo-EM combined with cross-linking mass spectrometry found that an adjacent lysine (K913) was in proximity to the DNA binding domain, suggesting that ubiquitylation at K911 could disrupt DNA binding 28 .”
BackgroundSelf-citationA Novel Mechanism of Coactivator Recruitment by the Nurr1 Nuclear Receptor
Daffern, N., & Radhakrishnan, I. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2022.167718 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Extra-nuclear and cytoplasmic steroid receptor signalling in hormone dependent cancers
Agbana, S., & McIlroy, M. (2024) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106559 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Furthermore, not only can 3 K-SR protein allostery be mediated by the degree of ligand affinity but also by the degree of DNA affinity; with contributions from both elements ultimately determining the activity of receptor [127].”
BackgroundStructure-function relationships of the aldosterone receptor
Fuller, P. J., Young, M. J., Yang, J., & Cole, T. J. (2023) · Vitamins and hormones · doi:10.1016/bs.vh.2022.12.007 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Structural basis of interdomain communication in PPARγPreprint
Mosure, S. A., Munoz‐Tello, P., Kuo, K.-T., MacTavish, B. S., Yu, X., Scholl, D., Williams, C. C., Strutzenberg, T. S., Li, J., Bass, J., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.13.499031 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Furthermore, AlphaFold 17 models of nuclear receptors frequently show cloud-like AF-1/NTD structural depictions that are thought to be an artifact of the computational method to avoid steric clashes with structured domains 18 .”
BackgroundStructural perspectives on the androgen receptor, the elusive shape-shifter
Johnson, M. J., & Wasmuth, E. V. (2024) · Steroids · doi:10.1016/j.steroids.2024.109501 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationMa, F., Chen, S., Cecchi, L. G., Ersoy-Fazlioglu, B., Russo, J. W., Arai, S., Awad, S., Calagua, C., Xie, F., Poluben, L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci192368 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“More recently, it has become clear that ERG expression has marked global effects on gene expression in PCa cells and, in particular, on the AR cistrome and transcriptome, where it directly interacts with AR and functions to maintain or expand AR signaling and luminal epithelial lineage (16–23).”
Small-molecule disruption of androgen receptor–dependent chromatin clusters
Kohrt, S. E., Novak, E. J., Tapadar, S., Wu, B., Strope, J. D., Asante, Y., Kim, H., Chang, M. S., Gurdak, D., Khalil, A., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2406239121 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Mechanisms of ligand-mediated modulation of mineralocorticoid receptor signaling
Fuller, P. J., Yang, J., Young, M. J., & Cole, T. J. (2025) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2025.112504 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Yin, X., Gu, H., Ning, D., Li, Y.-S., & Tang, H. (2024) · OncoTargets and Therapy · doi:10.2147/ott.s456746 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“22 27 However, in vivo assessments of AR activation in animal models have not been thoroughly examined.”
BackgroundMiyahira, A. K., Hawley, J. E., Adelaiye-Ogala, R. M., Calais, J., Nappi, L., Parikh, R. B., Seibert, T. M., Wasmuth, E. V., Wei, X. X., Pienta, K. J., et al. (2022) · The Prostate · doi:10.1002/pros.24461 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“conformational flexibility that corresponds to a range of AR activity.(116) This is facilitated in part by a plastic dimerization interface within the LBD that is likely conserved in related 3‐ketosteroid receptors (such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR)(117)) but “inside out” relative to other nuclear receptors, in…”
BackgroundSelf-citationLisberg, A. E., Liu, Y., & Merry, D. E. (2024) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107246 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The Androgen Receptor: Key to Testosterone Function and Androgen Sensitivity
Paakinaho, V., & Palvimo, J. J. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96376-6_12 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Coactivator networks orchestrating noncanonical AR programs in enzalutamide-resistant CRPC
Gardner, E. J., Ponnusamy, S., & Adelaiye-Ogala, R. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1748527 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Shi, R., Gu, K., Li, H., et al. (2026) · Cancer Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41417-026-01013-y · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ahmed, J., Claridge, J. K., Mészáros, A., & Tompa, P. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.04.551977
Li, Z., Chen, J., Zhu, D., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20250441
Li, Z., Chen, J., Zhu, D., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20250438
Wang, H., Luo, Y., Artham, S., Wang, Q., Peng, Y., Yun, Z., Li, X., Wu, C., Liu, Z., Weber-Bonk, K. L., et al. (2025) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-25-0405
Paakinaho, V., Sutinen, P., Malinen, M., & Palvimo, J. J. (2026) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29456-8_12-2
Wang, X., Xu, X., Fang, S., et al. (2026) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-026-15792-y
“Within the nucleus, AR dimerizes and binds to androgen response elements (ARE) in target gene promoters, orchestrating transcriptional regulation through dynamic interactions with coregulatory proteins [27, 28].”
Tsutsumi, T., & Tsuchiya, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark · doi:10.31083/fbl47713 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Regulation of the Mineralocorticoid Receptor in Physiology and Disease
Young, M. J., Fuller, P. J., Meijer, O. C., Cole, T. J., Kanki, M., Yang, J., Ho, Q. V., Karthigan, N., & Heanue, S. (2026) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.pharmr.2026.100156
Dziubańska-Kusibab, P. J., Jourdan, T., & Haendler, B. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27188200
“Allosteric surfaces involved in AR activation and cooperative interaction with ERG, and which contribute to resistance to AR-directed inhibitor treatment, have been identified [179].”
- Authors
- Wasmuth, E. V., Broeck, A. V., LaClair, J. R., Hoover, E. A., Lawrence, K. E., Paknejad, N., Pappas, K., Matthies, D., Wang, B., Feng, W., Watson, P. A., Zinder, J. C., Karthaus, W. R., de la Cruz, M. J., Hite, R. K., Manova-Todorova, K., Yu, Z., Weintraub, S. T., Klinge, S., & Sawyers, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wasmuth, Elizabeth V.
- Sawyers, Charles L.
- ORCID
- Wasmuth, Elizabeth V.
- Broeck, Arnaud Vanden
- LaClair, Justin R.
- Lawrence, Kayla E.
- Paknejad, Navid
- Pappas, Kyrie
- Matthies, Doreen
- Wang, Biran
- Feng, Weiran
- Watson, Philip A.
- Zinder, John C.
- Karthaus, Wouter R.
- Hite, Richard K.
- Manova-Todorova, Katia
- Yu, Zhiheng
- Weintraub, Susan T.
- Klinge, Sebastian
- Sawyers, Charles L.
- Venue
- Molecular Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2021-2031.e5
- ISSN
- 1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9177810
- OpenAlex
- W4225921237
- Semantic Scholar
- 7f1fb548b331b516e365eb39abc2c2114d8a73ac
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Simons Foundation (SF349247)
- U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-18-1-0182)
- National Cancer Institute (CA193837, CA092629, CA224079, CA008748)
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- National Institutes of Health (K99 GM140264, CA155169, U24 GM129539)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- Prostate Cancer Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- androgen receptor, allosteric interactions, receptor dimerization, DNA binding, dimer interface, androgen insensitivity syndrome, transcriptional activation, nuclear receptor structure, prostate cancer, cooperative DNA binding, single-particle cryo-electron microscopy
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Receptors, Androgen, Transcriptional Activation, Dimerization, Cryoelectron Microscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review