Cited by 163Lysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegeneration in Lysosomal Storage Disorders

Open access
Plotegher, Nicoletta, Duchen, Michael R.·2017·Trends in Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) are rare inherited debilitating and often fatal disorders. Caused by mutations affecting lysosomal proteins, LSDs are characterized by the accumulation of undegraded material in lysosomes and by lysosomal dysfunction. Although LSDs are multisystemic diseases, the majority display neurologic symptoms and neurodegeneration. Only recently has a role emerged for mitochondrial dysfunction in the pathophysiology of LSDs, suggesting an impact of lysosomal dysfunction on mitochondria. Moreover, mitochondrial damage may also cause lysosomal dysfunction, further supporting the activity of common signaling pathways and crosstalk between the two organelles. In this review we explore the mechanisms linking lysosomal and mitochondrial dysfunction to assess whether specific mitochondrial pathways represent a new therapeutic frontier in the management of LSDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.12.003

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 141 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plotegher, N., & Duchen, M. R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Duchen, Michael R.
Venue
Trends in Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
116-134
ISSN
1471-4914 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2575523348
Cited by
161
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, neurodegeneration, lysosomal dysfunction, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Lysosomes, Mitochondria, Mutation, Proteins, Lysosomal Storage Diseases, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review