Cited by 13Evolution and Genetic DynamicsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentProbability and Statistical Research

Estimating mutation rates in low-replication experiments

Open access
Couce, Alejandro, Blázquez, Jesús·2011·Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Abstract

Since mutation rate is a key biological parameter, its proper estimation has received great attention for decades. However, instead of the mutation rate, many authors opt for reporting the average mutant frequency, a less meaningful quantity. This is because the standard methods to estimate the mutation rate, derived from the Luria and Delbrück's fluctuation analysis, ideally require high-replication experiments to be applied; a requirement often unattainable due to constraints of time, budget or sample availability. But the main problem with mutant frequency, apart from being less informative, is its poor reproducibility; an especially marked defect when the chosen average is the arithmetic mean. Several authors tried to avoid this by employing other averages (such as the median or the geometric mean) or discarding outliers, though as far as we know nobody has evaluated which method performs best under low-replication settings. Here we use computer simulations to compare the performance of different methods used in low-replication experiments (≤4 cultures). Besides the customary averages of mutant frequency, we also tested two well-known fluctuation methods. Contrary to common practice, our results support that fluctuation methods should be applied in such circumstances, as they perform as well as or better than any average of mutant frequency. In particular, experimentalists will benefit from using MSS maximum likelihood in low-replication experiments because it: (i) provid…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.06.005

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Couce, A., & Blázquez, J.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Couce, Alejandro
Venue
Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
714
Issue
1-2
Pages
26-32
ISSN
  • 0027-5107 (ISSN-L)
  • 1386-1964
OpenAlex
W2056349084
Cited by
13
References
29
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
mutation rate estimation, mutant frequency, reproducibility, geometric mean, median, outlier removal, computer simulation
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Genetic Techniques, Mutation, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review