Cited by 347Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesRNA Interference and Gene DeliverySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 217 of the 218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 187 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development

Open access
Verbeke, Rein, Lentacker, Ine, De Smedt, Stefaan C., Dewitte, Heleen·2019·Nano Today

Abstract

Abstract In the early nineties, pioneering steps were taken in the use of mRNA as a therapeutic tool for vaccination. In the following decades, an improved understanding of the mRNA pharmacology, together with novel insights in immunology have positioned mRNA-based technologies as next-generation vaccines. This review outlines the history and current state-of-the-art in mRNA vaccination, while presenting an immunological view on mRNA vaccine development. As such, we highlight the challenges in vaccine design, testing and administration, key considerations in the design of mRNA-based vaccines and new opportunities that arise when packaging mRNA in nanoparticulate vaccines. Finally, we discuss the mRNA self-adjuvant effect as a critical, but dichotomous parameter that determines the safety, efficacy and strength of the evoked immune response.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This narrative review traces three decades of mRNA vaccine development, from early liposomal and naked mRNA expression studies to lipid-nanoparticle-formulated clinical candidates. It argues that the central challenge is balancing mRNA translation capacity against the mRNA self-adjuvant type I IFN response to achieve safe and effective immunity.

Key findings

  • Early work showed mRNA could be delivered in vivo: liposomal mRNA transfected eukaryotic cells, and intramuscular naked mRNA produced encoded protein for a couple of days; mRNA encoding influenza nucleoprotein elicited virus-specific CTLs, and mRNA encoding carcinoembryonic antigen induced anti-tumoral antibody responses.
  • mRNA is intrinsically immunostimulatory via endosomal TLR3/7/8 and cytosolic RIG-I/MDA5, inducing type I IFN and pro-inflammatory cytokines; this self-adjuvant effect supports DC maturation and T cell activation but also inhibits mRNA translation and antigen expression.
  • Nucleoside-modified mRNA improves stability and translation—e.g., 25% thio-uridine and 25% 5-methylcytidine mRNA encoding Epo gave five times higher Epo levels than untreated mice two weeks after i.m. administration—but can reduce CTL responses due to lower type I IFN; unmodified mRNA may favor CTL responses while modified mRNA favors antibody responses.
  • Delivery route and formulation matter: in rhesus macaques, i.d. delivery of ionizable LNP with nucleoside-modified mRNA gave earlier skin DC activation, more efficient migration to draining LNs, prolonged antigen availability, and superior antibody titers and CD4+ T cell activation versus i.m.; nanoparticles up to 200 nm can enter lymphatic vessels, and a <50 nm calcium-phosphate/DOTAP/DSPE-PEG mRNA system showed mRNA in draining LN as early as 4 h after s.c. injection.

Methods

  • Narrative review synthesizing historical, immunological, delivery, and clinical literature on mRNA vaccines; no primary experimental data are reported.
  • Data include published preclinical and clinical studies, with a table summarizing selected clinical trial results across CureVac, BioNTech, Moderna, and eTheRNA platforms.
  • Main analysis is qualitative: it discusses mRNA pharmacology, innate immune sensing, nanoparticle design, administration routes, type I IFN effects, and combination with checkpoint inhibitors.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: clinical patient numbers are still limited; detailed studies on biomolecular corona formation and dynamics on LNPs are still very limited; how type I IFN signaling relates to mRNA vaccine design requires further investigation.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it lacks systematic search/selection criteria and quantitative synthesis; Table 1 combines heterogeneous platforms, doses, routes, and trial phases, limiting direct comparisons.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100766

Cites

217 of 218 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 187 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 113 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 68
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 39
97 of 97
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    When mRNA LNPs are prepared by admixing mRNA with pre-formed monolamellar liposomes containing a permanently-charged lipid, the liposomes reorganize to form a multi-lamellar structure in which mRNA molecules are sandwiched between concentric lipid bilayers.

    “When mRNA LNPs are prepared by admixing mRNA with pre-formed (monolamellar) liposomes containing a permanently-charged lipid, it is assumed that the liposomes reorganize to form a multi-lamellar structure in which mRNA molecules are”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–218 of 218

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Conry, 1995, Cancer Res., 55, 1397
  2. Devoldere, 2015, Drug Discov. Today
  3. Orlandini von Niessen, 2018, Mol. Ther., 271, 824
  4. Vu, 2019, Nat. Nanotechnol.
  5. Pepini, 2017, J. Immunol.
  6. Kirschman, 2017, Nucleic Acids Res.
  7. Verbeke, 2019, ACS Nano, 13, 1655
  8. Kübler, 2015, JITC, 3, 26
  9. Bazhin, 2018, Front. Immunol., 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Verbeke, R., Lentacker, I., De Smedt, S. C., & Dewitte, H.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
Nano Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
28
Pages
100766
ISSN
1748-0132 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969814123
Cited by
342
References
218
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 14
FWCI
13.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nano Today (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, mRNA, vaccine design, vaccine safety and efficacy, vaccine administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review