Cited by 206Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

mRNA Vaccine with Antigen-Specific Checkpoint Blockade Induces an Enhanced Immune Response against Established Melanoma

Open access
Wang, Yuhua, Zhang, Lu, Xu, Zhenghong, Miao, Lei, Huang, Leaf·2018·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

We reported a preclinical cancer vaccine that simultaneously introduced an mRNA antigen and an immune checkpoint blocking siRNA into the antigen-presenting cells. This was achieved by formulating both nucleic acid-based immunotherapeutics into a lipid-coated calcium phosphate (LCP) nanoparticle (NP) as a carrier to address the delivery challenge. The PEGylated lipid NPs were functionalized with mannose as the targeting ligand to facilitate the preferential uptake by the dendritic cells (DCs) in the lymph nodes after subcutaneous administration. The calcium phosphate core allowed acid-mediated dissolution in the endo-lysosomal compartment, which prompted rapid release of cargoes after cellular internalization of NP. LCP mRNA vaccine encoding TRP2 elicited a robust antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell response and a humoral immune response in a C57BL/6 mouse model of B16F10 melanoma. The immune responses efficaciously inhibited the melanoma growth. Moreover, co-delivery of PD-L1 siRNA and mRNA vaccine resulted in the downregulation of PD-L1 in the DCs that presented tumor antigens, significantly prompting T cell activation and proliferation. The enhanced T cell response had a profound inhibitory effect on tumor growth and metastasis. Generally, the work provided a paradigm for the development of an mRNA vaccine carrier to boost the anticancer immune response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mannose-modified lipid nanoparticle-mRNA formulations are preferentially taken up by dendritic cells.

    “To further improve vaccine efficacy, APC uptake and T cell activation can be optimized; for example, mannose-modified lipid nanoparticle–mRNA formulations are preferentially taken up by dendritic cells150,201,202.”

    From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [202]

  • Wang et al. generated a nanoparticle system consisting of a pre-condensed core of mRNA and calcium phosphate, stabilized by DOPA and coated by a lipid shell of DOTAP and DSPE-PEG.

    “To give an example of an optimized mRNA LNP for lymphatic transport, Wang et al. generated a nanoparticle system consisting of a pre-condensed core of mRNA and calcium phosphate, stabilized by DOPA and coated by a lipid shell of DOTAP and DSPE-PEG [135].”

    From Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development (2019) · cites this paper as [135]

  • These mRNA nanoparticles have a relatively small particle size (<50 nm) and an uncharged, strongly PEGylated outer surface.

    “These mRNA nanoparticles had a relatively small particle size (<50 nm), and an uncharged, strongly PEGylated outer-surface.”

    From Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development (2019) · cites this paper as [135]

  • Accumulating pre-clinical evidence shows that T cell responses and antitumor effects evoked by mRNA cancer therapeutics can strongly be strengthened by combining them with checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1(L)- and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies.

    “Indeed, accumulating pre-clinical evidence shows that T cell responses and antitumor effects evoked by mRNA cancer therapeutics can strongly be strengthened by combining them with checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1(L)-, and also anti-CTLA-4 antibodies [135,196,214,218,219].”

    From Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development (2019) · cites this paper as [135]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Xu, Z., Miao, L., & Huang, L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Leaf
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
420-434
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769547311
Cited by
206
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
NIH (CA149363, CA151652, CA149387)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, immune checkpoint blockade, melanoma, dendritic cell targeting, mannose functionalization, antigen-presenting cells, cytotoxic T lymphocyte response, humoral immune response, tumor growth inhibition, metastasis
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Animals, Antigens, Neoplasm, Calcium Phosphates, Dendritic Cells, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Lipids, Lymph Nodes, Melanoma, RNA, Messenger, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cancer Vaccines, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Nanoparticles, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Immunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review