Cited by 149Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryImmune responses and vaccinations

Polarization of immunity induced by direct injection of naked sequence-stabilized mRNA vaccines

Open access
Carralot, J.-P., Probst, J., Hoerr, I., Scheel, B., Teufel, R., Jung, G., Rammensee, H.-G., Pascolo, S.·2004·Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS

Abstract

In the context of developing a safe genetic vaccination strategy we tested and studied globin-stabilized mRNA-based vaccination in mice. This vaccination strategy has the advantages of genetic vaccination (easy production, adaptability to any disease and inexpensive storage when lyophilized), but not the drawbacks of DNA vaccination (long-term uncontrolled expression of a transgene, possibility of integration into the host genome and possible induction of anti-DNA antibodies). We report here that injection of naked beta-globin untranslated region (UTR)-stabilized mRNA coding for beta-galactosidase is followed by detectable translation in vivo. In addition, we show that such a vaccination strategy primes a T helper 2 (Th2) type of response which can be enhanced and shifted to a Th1-type immune response by application of recombinant granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1 day after mRNA injection. Our data demonstrate that the administration of globin UTR-stabilized mRNA is a versatile vaccination strategy that can be manipulated to fit the requirement of antiviral, antibacterial or antitumor immunity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00018-004-4255-0

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antigen-encoding RNA has the advantages of a genetic vaccine (delivery of all epitopes of the whole antigen, easy manufacturing, standardized purification) and is a safe pharmaceutical characterized by transient expression and lack of integration into the genome of the treated host.

    “Antigen-encoding RNA 1,2 has the advantages of a genetic vaccine (delivery of all epitopes of the whole antigen, easy manufacturing, standardized purification) and the added value of a safe pharmaceutical characterized by transient expression and lack of integration into the genome of the treated host.”

    From Modification of antigen-encoding RNA increases stability, translational efficacy, and T-cell stimulatory capacity of dendritic cells (2006) · cites this paper as [2]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 5′ UTR is mostly retrieved from genes such as globin, Hsp70, axon dynein heavy chain 2 (DNAH2), and hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD).

    “In contrast, the 5′ UTR is mostly retrieved from genes such as globin, Hsp70, axon dynein heavy chain 2 (DNAH2), and hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD).144,145”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [144]

  • Intradermal injections of GM-CSF contributed to infiltration of monocytes and migration of mRNA-transfected, matured dendritic cells to lymph nodes.

    “Intradermal injections of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) contributed to the infiltration of monocytes, and to the migration of mRNA-transfected, matured DCs to the LNs [86,87].”

    From Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development (2019) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carralot, J.-P., Probst, J., Hoerr, I., Scheel, B., Teufel, R., Jung, G., Rammensee, H.-G., & Pascolo, S.
Affiliations
  • CureVac (Germany) (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Pascolo, S.
Venue
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS
Published
2004-09
Volume
61
Issue
18
Pages
2418-2424
ISSN
  • 1420-682X (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-9071
OpenAlex
W2038715317
Cited by
149
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, beta-galactosidase, genetic immunization, T helper 2 response, Th1 polarization, GM-CSF, in vivo translation, immunogenicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, beta-Galactosidase, Cell Line, Female, Globins, Injections, Mice, Inbred BALB C, RNA, Messenger, Protein Biosynthesis, Vaccines, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor, Cytokines, Th1 Cells, Th2 Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review