Cited by 354Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 137 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a functional organization of episodic memory in the medial temporal lobe

Open access

Abstract

Here we describe a model of medial temporal lobe organization in which parallel "what" and "where" processing streams converge within the hippocampus to represent events in the spatio-temporal context in which they occurred; this circuitry also mediates the retrieval of context from event cues and vice versa, which are prototypes of episodic recall. Evidence from studies in animals are reviewed in support of this model, including experiments that distinguish characteristics of episodic recollection from familiarity, neuropsychological and recording studies that have identified a key role for the hippocampus in recollection and in associating events with the context in which they occurred, and distinct roles for parahippocampal region areas in separate "what" and "where" information processing that contributes to recollective and episodic memory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.006

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 130 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 354

Metadata

Authors
Eichenbaum, H., Sauvage, M., Fortin, N., Komorowski, R., & Lipton, P.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Eichenbaum, Howard
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
36
Issue
7
Pages
1597-1608
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118443528
Cited by
354
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH051570, P50MH071702, R01MH052090)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
episodic memory, medial temporal lobe, hippocampus, recollection, familiarity, parahippocampal cortex, contextual memory, event memory, memory retrieval, functional organization
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Neurons, Mental Recall, Temporal Lobe, Recognition, Psychology, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review