Cited by 105Multisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.

Shore, David I., Barnes, Morgan E., Spence, Charles·2006·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

We report an experiment designed to investigate the temporal dynamics of the visuotactile crossmodal congruency effect. Vibrotactile targets were presented randomly to the index finger (top side of a hand-held cube) or thumb (bottom side) of either hand while visual distractors were presented randomly from one of the same four possible locations. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the vibrotactile target and the visual distractor was varied on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants made speeded discrimination responses regarding the elevation of the vibrotactile targets (i.e., upper versus lower) while trying to ignore the visual distractors. The largest crossmodal congruency effects (defined as the difference in performance between incongruent and congruent elevation distractor trials) were obtained when the visual distractor preceded the vibrotactile target by 50-100 ms, although significant effects were also reported when the distractor followed the target by as much as 100 ms. These results are discussed in terms of the conjoint influence of response competition, crossmodal perceptual interactions (i.e., the ventriloquism effect), and exogenous spatial attention on the crossmodal congruency effect. The distinct temporal signatures of each of these effects are also highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.001

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shore, D. I., Barnes, M. E., & Spence, C.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Shore, David I.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
392
Issue
1-2
Pages
96-100
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056416584
Cited by
105
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
crossmodal congruency, temporal dynamics, stimulus onset asynchrony, visual distractors, response competition, ventriloquism effect, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Photic Stimulation, Proprioception, Reaction Time, Space Perception, Touch, Vibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review