Cited by 81Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and EffectsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The bile steroid chenodeoxycholate is a potent antagonist at NMDA and GABAA receptors

Schubring, S.R., Fleischer, W., Lin, J.S., Haas, H.L., Sergeeva, O.A.·2012·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

The bile steroids (BS) cholic acid and chenodeoxycholic acid are produced in hepatocytes and in the brain. Nothing is known about neuronal actions of BS. Deficiency in a 27-hydroxylase enzyme coincides with reduced production of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) and a relative increase in cholic acid in an inherited lipid storage disease, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, characterized by neurological dysfunctions, which can be treated by dietary CDCA. We have examined the modulation of hypothalamic network activity by nine common BS. Cholate and CDCA significantly reduced the firing of hypothalamic neurons and synchronized network activity with CDCA being nearly 10 times more potent. The synthetic BS dehydrocholate synchronized the activity without affecting the firing rate. Gabazine, a GABA(A) receptor antagonist, occluded synchronization by BS. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings revealed a block of NMDA- and GABA(A)-receptors by BS. Potencies of nine common BS differed between NMDA and GABA(A) receptors, however in both cases they correlated with BS affinities for albumin but not with their lipophilicity, supporting a direct action at ligand gated ion channels. GABAergic synaptic currents displayed a faster decay under BS. Our data provide new insight into extrahepatic functions of BS revealing their neuroactive potential.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.11.036

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schubring, S. R., Fleischer, W., Lin, J. S., Haas, H. L., & Sergeeva, O. A.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Sergeeva, O.A.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
506
Issue
2
Pages
322-326
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991971927
Cited by
81
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG SE 1767, SFB 575/3 and 8)
  • INSERM (U628)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
chenodeoxycholic acid, cholic acid, NMDA receptor antagonism, GABA-A receptor antagonism, hypothalamic neurons, neuronal network synchronization, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis, dehydrocholic acid, albumin binding
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Chenodeoxycholic Acid, Hypothalamus, Neurons, Receptors, GABA-A, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Mice, GABA-A Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review