Cited by 110Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Age-related cognitive deficits in rhesus monkeys mirror human deficits on an automated test battery

Open access
Nagahara, Alan H., Bernot, Tim, Tuszynski, Mark H.·2010·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

Aged non-human primates are a valuable model for gaining insight into mechanisms underlying neural decline with aging and during the course of neurodegenerative disorders. Behavioral studies are a valuable component of aged primate models, but are difficult to perform, time consuming, and often of uncertain relevance to human cognitive measures. We now report findings from an automated cognitive test battery in aged primates using equipment that is identical, and tasks that are similar, to those employed in human aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies. Young (7.1+/-0.8 years) and aged (23.0+/-0.5 years) rhesus monkeys underwent testing on a modified version of the Cambridge Automated Neuropsychological Test Battery (CANTAB), examining cognitive performance on separate tasks that sample features of visuospatial learning, spatial working memory, discrimination learning, and skilled motor performance. We find selective cognitive impairments among aged subjects in visuospatial learning and spatial working memory, but not in delayed recall of previously learned discriminations. Aged monkeys also exhibit slower speed in skilled motor function. Thus, aged monkeys behaviorally characterized on a battery of automated tests reveal patterns of age-related cognitive impairment that mirror in quality and severity those of aged humans, and differ fundamentally from more severe patterns of deficits observed in AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.07.007

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on memory in rodents and monkeys suggests that both spatial (what-where) and temporal (what-when) elements of memory decline alongside typical age-related changes within the brain.

    “research on memory in rodents and monkeys, although again not strictly in line with episodic-like memory criteria, suggests that both spatial (what–where) [139–142] and temporal (what–when) [142,143] elements of memory decline alongside typical age-related changes within the brain.”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [139]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kausler DH Learning and Memory in Normal Aging 1994 San Diego Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagahara, A. H., Bernot, T., & Tuszynski, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Tuszynski, Mark H.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1020-1031
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978217720
Cited by
110
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P01AG010435, AG10435)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
age-related cognitive decline, rhesus monkeys, visuospatial learning, spatial working memory, discrimination learning, motor speed, Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Cognition Disorders, Discrimination, Psychological, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Motor Skills, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review