Cited by 620Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The functional emergence of prefrontally-guided working memory systems in four- to eight-year-old children

Luciana, Monica, Nelson, Charles A.·1998·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

The neural processes that underlie the functional emergence of human cognitive functions, particularly those associated with the prefrontal cortex (PFC), are of growing interest to developmental psychologists and neuroscientists. Specifically, working memory functions have been correlated with PFC activity in nonhuman primates and adult humans but have not been extensively studied in children. We examined the developmental emergence of functions involved in working memory through the use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB), a computerized battery of nonverbal visually-presented neuropsychological tests designed to dissociate frontal from temporal lobe behavioral functions. Participants were normal children, aged 4-8 (n = 181) and a small group of young adults (n = 24) who completed measures of Spatial Memory Span, Spatial Working Memory, the Tower of London planning task, Visual Pattern and Spatial Recognition tasks, and a Set-Shifting task. Findings indicate a general age-related progression in ability levels on frontal lobe tasks, with 4-year-olds performing worse than 5- to 7-year-olds on all measures. Eight-year-olds are superior to younger children in their ability to solve complex problems but have not yet reached adult levels of performance on the most difficult items of the Tower of London and Spatial Working Memory tasks. We conclude that the development of working memory functions proceeds dimensionally, starting with refinement of basic perceptual and sensorimotor functions and culminating with the physiological maturation of widespread neural networks that integrate complex processing demands inherent to working memory tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00109-7

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After kindergarten, there are even more improvements in cognitive flexibility, which last until early adolescence, the time when children reach adult levels.

    “After kindergarten, there are even more improvements (Luciana and Nelson, 1998), which last until early adolescence, the time when they reach adult levels.”

    From Assessment of executive functions in school-aged children: A narrative review (2022) · cites this paper as Luciana and Nelson, 1998

  • The Tower of London is generally considered too difficult for preschoolers; less than half of a 4-year-old sample understood task requirements despite extensive training.

    “This task is generally considered too difficult for preschoolers, as demonstrated by Luciana and Nelson (1998) who found that less than half of their 4-year-old sample understood task requirements despite extensive training.”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Luciana & Nelson, 1998

  • The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) has a computerized version of self-ordered searching called Spatial Working Memory.

    “The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) has a computerized version of self-ordered searching referred to as Spatial Working Memory.”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Luciana & Nelson, 1998

  • Luciana and Nelson (1998) reported that 4-year-olds make more perseverative errors than older preschoolers on a computerized self-ordered search task, which likely reflects less mature working memory.

    “With an older sample and a computerized self-ordered search task, Luciana and Nelson (1998) reported that 4-year-olds make more perseverative errors than older preschoolers, which likely reflects less mature working memory.”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Luciana & Nelson, 1998

  • Performance improves with age across the preschool period on measures of self-ordered pointing tasks.

    “Performance improves with age across the preschool period on measures of self-ordered pointing tasks (Hongwanishkul, Happaney, Lee, & Zelazo, 2005;Luciana & Nelson, 1998).”

    From Assessing Executive Function in Preschoolers (2012) · cites this paper as Luciana & Nelson, 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Luciana, Monica
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
273-293
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049187838
Cited by
620
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 39
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory, prefrontal cortex, cognitive development, children, frontal lobe function, spatial working memory, Tower of London, set-shifting, problem solving, age differences, neuronal maturation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Humans, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review