Cited by 58Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Estimating sample sizes for predementia Alzheimer's trials based on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access
Grill, Joshua D., Di, Lijie, Lu, Po H., Lee, Cathy, Ringman, John, Apostolova, Liana G., Chow, Nicole, Kohannim, Omid +3 more·2013·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

This study modeled predementia Alzheimer's disease clinical trials. Longitudinal data from cognitively normal (CN) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) participants in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were used to calculate sample size requirements for trials using outcome measures, including the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes, Mini-Mental State Examination, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale with and without delayed recall, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task. We examined the impact on sample sizes of enrichment for genetic and biomarker criteria, including cerebrospinal fluid protein and neuroimaging analyses. We observed little cognitive decline in the CN population at 36 months, regardless of the enrichment strategy. Nonetheless, in CN subjects, using Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task total as an outcome at 36 months required the fewest subjects across enrichment strategies, with apolipoprotein E genotype ε4 carrier status requiring the fewest (n = 499 per arm to demonstrate a 25% reduction in disease progression). In MCI, enrichment reduced the required sample sizes for trials, relative to estimates based on all subjects. For MCI, the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes consistently required the smallest sample sizes. We conclude that predementia clinical trial conduct in Alzheimer's disease is enhanced by the use of biomarker inclusion criteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.006

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [57]Schott JM Bartlett JW Barnes J Leung KK Ourselin S Fox NC Reduced sample sizes for atrophy outcomes in Alzheimer’s disease trials: baseline adjustment Neurobiol Aging 31 8 1452 62 62 e1 2 20620665 PMC2947486

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grill, J. D., Di, L., Lu, P. H., Lee, C., Ringman, J., Apostolova, L. G., Chow, N., Kohannim, O., Cummings, J. L., Thompson, P. M., & Elashoff, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Grill, Joshua D.
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
62-72
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047170994
Cited by
58
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NIA (AG016570)
  • National Institutes of Health (U01 AG024904, P30 AG010129, K01 AG030514)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
sample size determination, clinical trial design, mild cognitive impairment, cognitively normal older adults, biomarker enrichment, APOE ε4, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging biomarkers, Clinical Dementia Rating, Mini-Mental State Examination, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognitive decline, disease progression
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Status Schedule, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Biomarkers, Sample Size, Disease Progression, Apolipoprotein E4, Neuroimaging, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review