Cited by 288Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Structural and functional biomarkers of prodromal Alzheimer's disease: A high-dimensional pattern classification study

Open access
Fan, Yong, Resnick, Susan M., Wu, Xiaoying, Davatzikos, Christos·2008·NeuroImage

Abstract

This work builds upon previous studies that reported high sensitivity and specificity in classifying individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which is often a prodromal phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD), via pattern classification of MRI scans. The current study integrates MRI and PET (15)O water scans from 30 participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, and tests the hypothesis that joint evaluation of structure and function can yield higher classification accuracy than either alone. Classification rates of up to 100% accuracy were achieved via leave-one-out cross-validation, whereas conservative estimates of generalization performance in new scans, evaluated via bagging cross-validation, yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve equal to 0.978 (97.8%), indicating excellent diagnostic accuracy. Spatial maps of regions determined to contribute the most to the classification implicated many temporal, prefrontal, orbitofrontal, and parietal regions. Detecting complex patterns of brain abnormality in early stages of cognitive impairment has pivotal importance for the detection and management of AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.043

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, Y., Resnick, S. M., Wu, X., & Davatzikos, C.
Affiliations
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Davatzikos, Christos
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
277-285
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986014162
Cited by
288
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 31
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (N01-AG-32124, Z01AG000191, R01 AG 14971, R01AG014971)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
prodromal Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, 15O-water PET, early detection of cognitive impairment, temporal lobe, prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, parietal cortex, Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review