Cited by 117Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Using support vector machines with multiple indices of diffusion for automated classification of mild cognitive impairment

Open access
O'Dwyer, Laurence, Lamberton, Franck, Bokde, Arun L. W., Ewers, Michael, Faluyi, Yetunde O., Tanner, Colby, Mazoyer, Bernard, O'Neill, Desmond +5 more·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Few studies have looked at the potential of using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in conjunction with machine learning algorithms in order to automate the classification of healthy older subjects and subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Here we apply DTI to 40 healthy older subjects and 33 MCI subjects in order to derive values for multiple indices of diffusion within the white matter voxels of each subject. DTI measures were then used together with support vector machines (SVMs) to classify control and MCI subjects. Greater than 90% sensitivity and specificity was achieved using this method, demonstrating the potential of a joint DTI and SVM pipeline for fast, objective classification of healthy older and MCI subjects. Such tools may be useful for large scale drug trials in Alzheimer's disease where the early identification of subjects with MCI is critical.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0032441

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An increase in axial diffusivity was observed, albeit in a spatially more restricted manner when compared to that of the other DTI indices.

    “Consistent with previous studies in mild cognitive impairment (O’Dwyer et al., 2012) and Alzheimer’s disease dementia (Acosta-Cabronero et al., 2010, 2012; Bosch et al., 2012), we observed an increase in axial diffusivity, albeit in a spatially more restricted manner when compared to that of the other DTI indices.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Witten I Frank E Hall M 2011 Data Mining (Third Edition) Boston Morgan Kaufmann p. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123748560000183. Accessed 17 Jun 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Dwyer, L., Lamberton, F., Bokde, A. L. W., Ewers, M., Faluyi, Y. O., Tanner, C., Mazoyer, B., O'Neill, D., Bartley, M., Collins, D. R., Coughlan, T., Prvulovic, D., & Hampel, H.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-02-23
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
e32441
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968126294
Cited by
117
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology
  • Science Foundation Ireland (08/IN.1/B1846)
  • Irish Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, diffusion tensor imaging, support vector machine, automatic classification, white matter, diffusion indices, older adults, Alzheimer's disease, drug trials, early detection
MeSH terms
Aged, Algorithms, Alzheimer Disease, Automation, Cognition Disorders, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Diffusion, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Support Vector Machine, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review