Cited by 126Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health Research TopicsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Investigation of relationships between fMRI brain networks in the spectral domain using ICA and granger causality reveals distinct differences between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls

Open access
Demirci, Oguz, Stevens, Michael C., Andreasen, Nancy C., Michael, Andrew, Liu, Jingyu, White, Tonya, Pearlson, Godfrey D., Clark, Vincent P. +1 more·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

Functional network connectivity (FNC) is an approach that examines the relationships between brain networks (as opposed to functional connectivity (FC) that focuses upon the relationships between single voxels). FNC may help explain the complex relationships between distributed cerebral sites in the brain and possibly provide new understanding of neurological and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. In this paper, we use independent component analysis (ICA) to extract the time courses of spatially independent components and then use these in Granger causality test (GCT) to investigate causal relationships between brain activation networks. We present results using both simulations and fMRI data of 155 subjects obtained during two different tasks. Unlike previous research, causal relationships are presented over different portions of the frequency spectrum in order to differentiate high and low-frequency effects and not merged in a scalar. The results obtained using Sternberg item recognition paradigm (SIRP) and auditory oddball (AOD) tasks showed FNC differentiations between schizophrenia and control groups, and explained how the two groups differed during these tasks. During the SIRP task, secondary visual and cerebellum activation networks served as hubs and included most complex relationships between the activated regions. Secondary visual and temporal lobe activations replaced these components during the AOD task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.014

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JW 1995 Structured Clinical Interview for Dsm-Iv Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition (Scid-I/P, Version 2.0) Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demirci, O., Stevens, M. C., Andreasen, N. C., Michael, A., Liu, J., White, T., Pearlson, G. D., Clark, V. P., & Calhoun, V. D.
Affiliations
  • Mind Research Network (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Demirci, Oguz
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
419-431
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973404966
Cited by
126
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1 R01 EB 000840, 1 R01 EB 005846)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-FG02-99ER62764)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
functional network connectivity, schizophrenia, Granger causality, independent component analysis, spectral domain, auditory oddball paradigm, secondary visual cortex, cerebellum, temporal lobe, network hubs, functional connectivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Cortex, Brain Mapping, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Reference Values, Schizophrenia, Principal Component Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review