Cited by 113Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

Brain networks involved in haptic and visual identification of facial expressions of emotion: an fMRI study

Kitada, Ryo, Johnsrude, Ingrid S., Kochiyama, Takanori, Lederman, Susan J.·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Previous neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies have shown that a cortical network involving the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), inferior parietal lobe (IPL) and cortical areas in and around the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) region is employed in action understanding by vision and audition. However, the brain regions that are involved in action understanding by touch are unknown. Lederman et al. (2007) recently demonstrated that humans can haptically recognize facial expressions of emotion (FEE) surprisingly well. Here, we report a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in which we test the hypothesis that the IFG, IPL and pSTS regions are involved in haptic, as well as visual, FEE identification. Twenty subjects haptically or visually identified facemasks with three different FEEs (disgust, neutral and happiness) and casts of shoes (shoes) of three different types. The left posterior middle temporal gyrus, IPL, IFG and bilateral precentral gyrus were activated by FEE identification relative to that of shoes, regardless of sensory modality. By contrast, an inferomedial part of the left superior parietal lobule was activated by haptic, but not visual, FEE identification. Other brain regions, including the lingual gyrus and superior frontal gyrus, were activated by visual identification of FEEs, relative to haptic identification of FEEs. These results suggest that haptic and visual FEE identification rely on distinct but overlapping neural substrates including the IFG, IPL and pSTS region.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.014

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Girls may use the cuneus and lingual gyrus, which are involved in emotional face processing, for socio-emotional processing as a distinct mechanism supporting connectivity patterns that manifest as sexually dimorphic social behavior.

    “Alternatively, girls may rely on regions such as the cuneus and LG, which are implicated in emotional face processing (Bremner et al., 2004, Kitada et al., 2010, Kret et al., 2011), for socio-emotional processing as a distinct mechanism supporting neural functional connectivity patterns that in turn manifest into sexually dimorphic social behavior.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitada, R., Johnsrude, I. S., Kochiyama, T., & Lederman, S. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP)
Corresponding author
Kitada, Ryo
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
1677-1689
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155136802
Cited by
113
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21119524)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
emotional facial expressions, haptic perception, visual perception, action understanding, inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, posterior superior temporal sulcus, sensory modalities, emotion recognition, brain networks
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Physical Stimulation, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception, Touch Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review