Cited by 86Humor Studies and ApplicationsTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Music Perception

It is not always tickling: Distinct cerebral responses during perception of different laughter types

Open access
Szameitat, Diana P., Kreifelts, Benjamin, Alter, Kai, Szameitat, André J., Sterr, Annette, Grodd, Wolfgang, Wildgruber, Dirk·2010·NeuroImage

Abstract

Laughter is highly relevant for social interaction in human beings and non-human primates. In humans as well as in non-human primates laughter can be induced by tickling. Human laughter, however, has further diversified and encompasses emotional laughter types with various communicative functions, e.g. joyful and taunting laughter. Here, it was evaluated if this evolutionary diversification of ecological functions is associated with distinct cerebral responses underlying laughter perception. Functional MRI revealed a double-dissociation of cerebral responses during perception of tickling laughter and emotional laughter (joy and taunt) with higher activations in the anterior rostral medial frontal cortex (arMFC) when emotional laughter was perceived, and stronger responses in the right superior temporal gyrus (STG) during appreciation of tickling laughter. Enhanced activation of the arMFC for emotional laughter presumably reflects increasing demands on social cognition processes arising from the greater social salience of these laughter types. Activation increase in the STG for tickling laughter may be linked to the higher acoustic complexity of this laughter type. The observed dissociation of cerebral responses for emotional laughter and tickling laughter was independent of task-directed focusing of attention. These findings support the postulated diversification of human laughter in the course of evolution from an unequivocal play signal to laughter with distinct emotional contents subserving complex social functions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.028

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different laughter types are distinguishable based on the vocal signal and cerebral activation patterns.

    “It has been demonstrated that different laughter types are distinguishable based on the vocal signal [27] and cerebral activation patterns [28], [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szameitat, D. P., Kreifelts, B., Alter, K., Szameitat, A. J., Sterr, A., Grodd, W., & Wildgruber, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Szameitat, Diana P.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
1264-1271
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042286850
Cited by
86
References
67
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
tickling, superior temporal gyrus, social cognition, acoustic complexity, social communication, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Laughter, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review