The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 12 of the 42 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators
Open accessAbstract
There is mounting evidence that mindfulness meditation is beneficial for the treatment of mood and anxiety disorders, yet little is known regarding the neural mechanisms through which mindfulness modulates emotional responses. Thus, a central objective of this functional magnetic resonance imaging study was to investigate the effects of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotionally laden stimuli. Another major goal of this study was to examine the impact of the extent of mindfulness training on the brain mechanisms supporting the processing of emotional stimuli. Twelve experienced (with over 1000. h of practice) and 10 beginner meditators were scanned as they viewed negative, positive, and neutral pictures in a mindful state and a non-mindful state of awareness. Results indicated that the Mindful condition attenuated emotional intensity perceived from pictures, while brain imaging data suggested that this effect was achieved through distinct neural mechanisms for each group of participants. For experienced meditators compared with beginners, mindfulness induced a deactivation of default mode network areas (medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate cortices) across all valence categories and did not influence responses in brain regions involved in emotional reactivity during emotional processing. On the other hand, for beginners relative to experienced meditators, mindfulness induced a down-regulation of the left amygdala during emotional processing. These findings suggest that the long-term practice of mindfulness leads to emotional stability by promoting acceptance of emotional states and enhanced present-moment awareness, rather than by eliciting control over low-level affective cerebral systems from higher-order cortical brain regions. These results have implications for affect-related psychological disorders. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
12 of 42 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Compassion meditation also induced increased amygdalar activation while listening to emotional and neutral sounds for experienced meditators relative to beginners.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Lutz et al. (2008) source
The Abstract reports increased amygdala activation in experts compared with novices during compassion meditation versus rest in response to all sounds. The study presented both emotional and neutral sounds, so this supports the cited paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This effect was more pronounced and widespread in individuals having completed an 8-week MSBR program compared to a control group.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Farb et al. (2007) source
The Narrative self-focus results report pervasive mPFC deactivations during experiential focus in the mindfulness-trained group, compared with more restricted reductions in novices. ROI analyses found significant ventral and dorsal mPFC reductions in the trained group but not the novice group. Materials and Methods identifies the training as an eight-week MBSR program. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“some neuroimaging studies suggest that long-term mindfulness meditation training can lead to decreased activation in prefrontal cortical areas, particularly the MPFC (Farb et al., 2007;Grant et al., 2011).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Farb et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Narrative self-focus section report more marked mPFC reductions during experiential versus narrative focus in participants who had completed an eight-week mindfulness course. The Discussion explicitly says the study lacked a pre/post design and cannot establish that training caused the difference; it also leaves open whether mPFC suppression is a lasting effect or a temporary, task-dependent one. Thus the source supports the mPFC activation finding, but not its attribution to long-term training as a causal effect. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Grant et al., 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“the premise that meditation stabilizes emotion by not evaluating or appraising salient stimuli is in line with the prefrontal deactivations reported during mindfulness (Farb et al., 2007;Grant et al., 2011).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Farb et al., 2007 source
The Abstract reports more marked reductions in medial prefrontal cortex activity during experiential focus in mindfulness-trained participants. The Discussion links this shift to observing thoughts and feelings with less judgment of their affective value, consistent with the cited neural finding. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Grant et al., 2011 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“individuals high in neuroticism are more reactive (physiologically and subjectively) to negative and positive emotional stimuli than individuals who are emotionally stable (Norris et al., 2007).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Norris et al., 2007 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Skin Conductance Reactivity results (p. 824) show greater physiological responses among participants higher in neuroticism to both pleasant and unpleasant pictures than to neutral pictures. The Discussion also describes more intense emotional reactions to stressors, but the study did not establish greater subjective reactivity to both positive and negative pictures; its picture-valence ratings were normative rather than participants’ reported reactions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“our findings indicate that during the processing of positive emotional stimuli, mindfulness induced deactivation in brain areas involved in addiction, awareness of interoceptive states of urges and pleasure, and reactivity to positive stimuli (amygdala, hippocampus, insula, basal ganglia; Craig, 2004;Everitt et al., 1999;Haruno et al., 2004;Naqvi and Bechara, 2010;Phillips and Ledoux, 1992;Prado-A”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Brain patterns related to mindfulness in experienced meditators and beginners
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Craig, 2004 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Everitt et al., 1999 source
- Partly supportedcites Haruno et al., 2004 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The fMRI study’s Subtraction analysis reports basal ganglia activation during a reward-based decision task and right amygdala activation under one task rule. It does not establish roles for the listed areas in addiction, awareness of urges or pleasure, or reactivity to positive emotional stimuli. The mindfulness-related deactivation is presented as the citing authors’ own finding, not a finding attributed to Haruno et al. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“This increased prefrontal cortical activation detected for beginner meditators, relative to experienced meditators, resembles to a notable extent brain activation patterns found during voluntary regulation of emotion (Beauregard et al., 2001;Levesque et al., 2003;Ochsner et al., 2002;Ochsner and Gross, 2005).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Brain patterns related to mindfulness in experienced meditators and beginners
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Beauregard et al., 2001 source
The Discussion reports activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during voluntary inhibition of sexual arousal. The beginner-versus-experienced meditator comparison is the citing authors’ own finding; this source is cited for the emotion-regulation activation pattern. No page number is identifiable in the supplied passage. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Levesque et al., 2003 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Ochsner et al., 2002 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For experienced meditators compared with beginners, mindfulness induced a deactivation of default mode network areas (medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate cortices) across all valence categories”
- Also stated in: § Condition × Group interaction · plain
“Mindfulness-induced deactivations were found in the right MPFC (BA 10, k = 51, t = 3.75, Z = 3.63, x = 11, y = 53, z = 11, P (FWE) = .040,d = 0.69) and right PCC (BA 29, k = 10, t = 3.34, Z = 3.26, x = 10, y = -48, z = 17, P (FWE) = .023,d = 0.61) for experienced relative to beginners.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Condition × Group interaction · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and did not influence responses in brain regions involved in emotional reactivity during emotional processing.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Results indicated that the Mindful condition attenuated emotional intensity perceived from pictures”
- Also stated in: § Self-report data · plain
“pictures viewed in the Mindful condition (M =1.29; SD=0.57) were rated as less emotionally intense than those viewed at Baseline (M =1.53; SD= 0.59).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Self-report data · plain
- Probably not a substantial claim. 25
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“the MBSR program led to reduced activation in regions associated with autobiographical memory and increased activity in the right insula (Farb et al., 2010).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Farb et al., 2010 source
The Discussion reports reduced activation in cortical midline regions associated with autobiographical memory retrieval in the mindfulness-training group. The Results (‘Deactivating regions’) report greater signal in a region extending into the right insula than in controls, clarifying that this relative increase reflected less sadness-related deactivation, not new activation. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“They found increased right insular activation for experienced meditators, relative to beginners, during a state of compassion meditation while listening to negative emotional sounds (compared to emotionally positive sounds).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Lutz et al. (2008) source
The Results report a right-insula Group-by-State-by-Valence interaction: experts showed a stronger response to negative than positive sounds during compassion meditation relative to rest, compared with novices. The Abstract also states that, during meditation, insula activation for negative versus positive sounds was greater in experts than novices. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“it has been demonstrated that mindfulness-based clinical interventions have beneficial outcomes on the treatment of affect-related psychopathology, including major depression (Bondolfi et al., 2010;Teasdale et al., 2000) and anxiety disorders (Goldin and Gross, 2010;Kabat-Zinn et al., 1992;Kim et al., 2009).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Bondolfi et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion report that mindfulness-based cognitive therapy significantly delayed relapse in patients in remission from recurrent major depression, but did not significantly reduce the 14-month relapse rate. This supports a benefit for depression relapse prevention, not a general claim about treating active major depression. The citing sentence attributes the anxiety-disorder claim to other sources, not Bondolfi et al. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Teasdale et al., 2000 source
- Supportedcites Goldin and Gross, 2010 source
Goldin and Gross are cited for the anxiety-disorders portion of the sentence, not the major-depression portion. The Results (Clinical Results) report decreased social anxiety and state anxiety after MBSR in patients with social anxiety disorder; the Discussion (Clinical Measures) likewise describes reduced social-anxiety symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Farb et al. (2007) found that an experiential focus condition (monitoring the self in terms of present-moment circumstances) was associated with deactivations of the ventral and dorsal MPFC compared with a narrative self-focus task (monitoring the self in terms of self-descriptive traits).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Farb et al. (2007) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Narrative self-focus results (Figure 3) report reduced ventral and dorsal mPFC activity during experiential versus narrative focus, but only in the mindfulness-trained group. The citing sentence omits that qualification; the paper says the reductions were not significant in novices. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the Group × Condition (F(1, 18) = 0.72, p = .382),Group × Valence × Condition (F(1, 18) = 0.45, p = .747),or Valence × Condition (F(1, 18) = 1.94, p = .17,η 2 = .170)interactions were not significant.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Self-report data
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Surprisingly, the effect of mindfulness did not apply specifically to any valence category or to either group (i.e., no significant interactions were found between condition, valence, or group).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For beginners, but not experienced meditators, mindfulness induced increased activity in the right medial frontal gyrus (BA 8, k = 486, t =4.86, Z =4.63, x=29, y=20, z =40, P(FWE)= .011,d =0.89), the left medial frontal gyrus (BA 8, k = 218, t =3.98, Z =3.85, x=-26, y=22, z=43, P(FWE) = .007,d = 0.85), the right PCC (BA 31, k =84, t =4.34, Z =4.17, x=11, y=-50, z =22, P(FWE) =.006, d =0.80)”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Condition × Group interaction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within-group analyses revealed that for beginners, but not for experienced meditators, mindfulness induced deactivations in the amygdala, right posterior insula (BA 13), putamen, left anterior insula (BA 13), caudate nucleus, left hippocampus, and right ACC (BA 24).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > fMRI data Emotional processing at Baseline
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No mindfulness-induced deactivations were observed for experienced meditators.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > fMRI data Emotional processing at Baseline
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Finally, for all activation loci reported, Cohen's D effect sizes (d) ranged from 0.54 to 1.24, which constitute medium to large effects according to established benchmarks (small: 0.20, medium: 0.50, large: 0.80; Cohen, 1992).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Group
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Cohen, 1992 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“revealing mindfulness-induced deactivations (at a more liberal threshold of p b 0.005 uncorrected) in the left amygdala (k = 22, t = 3.82, Z = 3.70, x = -27, y = -1, z = -18, P (FWE) = .010,d = 0.70) and right amygdala (k = 13, t = 3.53, Z = 3.43, x = 27, y = -1, z = -16, P(FWE) = .012,d = 0.65) for beginners, but not for experienced meditators.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > fMRI data Emotional processing at Baseline
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Regression analyses with the number of hours of meditation practice on the contrasts reported above were also computed, but no significant activations for either group, nor between groups were found”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Group
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For experienced meditators, mindfulness induced a deactivation of the right MPFC (though this was a sub-threshold trend at a more liberal threshold of p b .005)(BA 10, k = 36, t = 3.14, Z = 3.07, x = 13, y = 49, z = 9, P (uncorr.)= .001,d = 0.58) in experienced, but not in beginner meditators.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Condition × Group interaction
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For neutral pictures, a significant effect of mindfulness was also found (F(1, 18) = 5.40, p = .031,η 2 = .22;M = 0.62, SD = 0.49 for the Baseline condition; M = 0.44, SD = 0.37, for the Mindful condition), but this result may have been due to the little variability observed for neutral pictures”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Self-report data
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“mindfulness was shown to be associated with increased MPFC/LPFC activation and reduced amygdalar activation during affect labeling”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Creswell et al., 2007 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mindfulness meditation practiced following a sad mood induction was also shown to decrease dysphoric mood states (Broderick, 2005).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Broderick, 2005 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Volumes deviating in translation by more than 3 mm, which only occurred at the very beginning or very end of a given session, were considered outliers and were excluded from the analyses.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > fMRI data acquisition and analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There were no significant between-group differences with respect to age (p N 0.05) or to the ratio of male/female participants (p N 0.05).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No univariate or multivariate outliers were detected.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Stimuli and experimental procedure
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 20Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Creswell et al. (2007) found that participants high in trait mindfulness also had negative correlations between areas of the PFC (MPFC and LPFC) and the right amygdala, but not those low in trait mindfulness.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Creswell et al. (2007) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All variables were normally distributed, with skewness and kurtosis values ranging from -1.5 to 1.5.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Stimuli and experimental procedure
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings suggest that the long-term practice of mindfulness leads to emotional stability by promoting acceptance of emotional states and enhanced present-moment awareness, rather than by eliciting control over low-level affective cerebral systems from higher-order cortical brain regions.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These findings are consistent with evidence that the MPFC, through its inhibitory downstream connections to the amygdala, is implicated in the extinction of conditioned fear as well as the dampening of negative affect (Amaral et al., 1992;Davidson, 1998).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Amaral et al., 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Davidson, 1998 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assumptions for conducting a mixed-measure ANOVA, such as homogeneity of variance between groups and linearity, were met.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Stimuli and experimental procedure
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Brefczynski-Lewis et al. (2007) found a negative correlation between the number of hours of meditation training and right amygdala activation during concentration meditation in a group of experienced meditators while processing negative emotional sounds.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Brefczynski-Lewis et al. (2007) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to response box failure on certain trials, some stimuli were missing emotional intensity ratings (with no more than 25% of participant ratings missing for any given stimulus), which were distributed at random across groups.These missing values were replaced with the group's corresponding mean value to avoid losing statistical power.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Stimuli and experimental procedure
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only one individual had two days of meditation practice prior to testing (due to scheduling restraints), but reported compensating accordingly by practicing additional time each day.In all other participants, 100% compliance was observed.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“there are some reports that meditative states are associated with increased activation in various prefrontal cortical areas.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Newberg et al., 2001 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“most emotional self-regulation strategies aim at altering emotional states, whereas mindfulness is based on accepting emotional states as they are (Kabat-Zinn, 1994).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kabat-Zinn, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two participants in each group only had data for two runs (one from each condition) due to testing constraints or excessive movement; however, the number of degrees of freedom was adjusted accordingly in the group analyses.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > fMRI data acquisition and analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 2Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These decreased activations found in executive control areas have been proposed to reflect that meditation training is associated with a reduction in cognitive elaboration of aversive stimuli (Grant et al., 2011).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Grant et al., 2011 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All participants reported having successfully understood the mindfulness exercises.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Participants
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the results of this study suggest that with extensive meditation training, the mindfulness-induced emotional intensity attenuations may be achieved by accepting and fully experiencing emotional responses in the present moment without interference from internal thought and self-referent processes, as opposed to directly controlling low-order affective brain systems from higher-order cortical region”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the fact that the attenuating effect of mindfulness also applied to neutral pictures may have been due to the little variability observed for this category of pictures, and thus, very small mean differences may have attained significance.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the greater mindfulness-induced deactivation of the MPFC and PCC measured herein experienced meditators relative to beginnersmay reflect an adaptive process through which present-moment awareness is enhanced in individuals with long-term meditation experience, and information in the environment is processed with reduced distractibility and interference from self-referent thought or ruminative pro”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Brain patterns related to mindfulness in experienced meditators and beginners
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The attenuating effects of mindfulness on subjective emotional intensity observed in the present study are consistent with the view that mindfulness-based strategies promote emotional stability and constitute an efficient means of emotional self-regulation (Arch and Craske, 2006;Broderick, 2005).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“individuals with generalized anxiety disorder tend to respond to negative mood challenges with greater emotional intensity relative to their control counterparts; they also tend to become overwhelmed by their emotions and understand them poorly (Mennin et al., 2005).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mennin et al., 2005 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the fact that mindfulness did not influence amygdala responses for experienced meditators during emotional processing also supports the interpretation that participants with extensive mindfulness training adopted an accepting perspective towards their emotional responses and allowed themselves to fully experience them.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Brain patterns related to mindfulness in experienced meditators and beginners
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“an interaction between Group and Condition may have failed to attain statistical significance due to reduced power.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“while experienced meditators may have had some degree of amygdala reactivity to emotional stimuli in the mindful state, the MPFC (BA 10) deactivations during the Mindful condition indicates that mindfulness altered what happened after their initial response (cognitive elaboration, judgments, etc.), which led to decreased subjective emotional intensity.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Brain patterns related to mindfulness in experienced meditators and beginners
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result, mindfulness may diminish the need to seek out satisfaction from external positive stimuli, thereby attenuating the emotional intensity perceived from this category of pictures.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the ratings from two participants in the beginners' group were lost due to technical issues”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, mindfulness may decrease the propensity to avoid processing emotions by attenuating the emotional intensity perceived from given events, and constitute an adaptive alternative coping mechanism for populations with anxiety-related traits or psychopathology.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These activations seemed to have been driven by the group of beginners, as they were situated in the same loci as those found within the group of beginners alone, and were not present in the group of experienced meditators alone.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Main effects
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although both experienced and beginner meditators showed effects of mindfulness on subjective emotional intensity, differences in brain response patterns suggest that the two groups were in fact processing the stimuli in distinct ways during the Mindful condition.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Mindfulness and subjective emotional intensity elicited by the stimuli
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“due to technical constraints, we were unable to acquire other measures of emotional reactivity, such as galvanic skin response.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Limitations and future directions
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“as opposed to beginners who exhibited mindfulness-induced patterns of brain activity related to the voluntary regulation of emotion, the findings of this study indicate that a 'lack of control' over emotional states, i.e. acceptance, is associated with the emotional stability achieved by the long-term practice of mindfulness meditation.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results also demonstrate that for individuals with long-term practice of meditation, mindfulness induces a pattern of brain activity associated with acceptance of emotional stimuli and reduced interference from internal states, possibly reflecting enhanced present-moment awareness.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results indicate that extensive mindfulness practice promotes emotional stability and modulates the activity in a number of brain regions implicated in the neural responses to emotional stimuli.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there may have been differences between the two groups of participants other than mindfulness training (e.g., lifestyle, temperamental predispositions).”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Limitations and future directions
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The findings obtained in this study contribute to the understanding of the relationship between mindfulness meditation, brain function, and emotional processing, and have implications for clinical psychological disorders related to affect and anxiety.”
§ Impact of mindfulness on the neural responses to emotional pictures in experienced and beginner meditators > Conclusions
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Little is known regarding the brain mechanisms through which mindfulness meditation modulates the processing of emotional stimuli.
“Yet to date, little is known regarding the brain mechanisms through which mindfulness meditation modulates the processing of emotional stimuli.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Mindful condition successfully induced a state of mindfulness in participants.
“mindfulness induced a deactivation of the amygdala during the processing of negative and positive emotional stimuli for beginners relative to experienced meditators.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The observed group differences in brain activity and emotional intensity are attributable to long-term mindfulness meditation experience rather than pre-existing differences between groups.
“These results indicate that extensive mindfulness practice promotes emotional stability and modulates the activity in a number of brain regions implicated in the neural responses to emotional stimuli.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Results have supported the link between mindfulness and decreased reactivity to emotional pictures [16–18].”
From Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Affective Reactivity: A Motivational Approach Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures (2015) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For both novice and experienced meditators, mindful attention decreased self-reported emotional intensity to pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant pictures.”
From Self-Reported Trait Mindfulness and Affective Reactivity: A Motivational Approach Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures (2015) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Taylor et al. [33] revealed that mediators perceived pictures portraying positive and negative emotions to be less intense during a mindful (rather than nonmindful) state.”
From Potential therapeutic effects of meditation for treating affective dysregulation (2014) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“Converging evidence suggests that meditation training may be associated with decreased DMN activity,67, 70, 87, 94, 97–99”
From Awakening is not a metaphor: the effects of Buddhist meditation practices on basic wakefulness (2014) · cites this paper as [94]
In the citing paper
“Mindfulness has also been shown to induce a down-regulation of the left amygdala activation during emotional processing in novice practitioners47.”
In the citing paper
“Our data suggest that mindfulness training may exert a nuanced effect that is specific to the horizontal time course (chronometry) rather than a generalized suppression or blunting of the intensity or amplitude of emotional responses (Taylor et al., 2011).”
From Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy Improves Emotional Reactivity to Social Stress: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial (2012) · cites this paper as Taylor et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Studies suggest that mindfulness techniques may reduce evaluative processing in the brain.1–3”
In the citing paper
“However, long-term mindfulness practice may lead to emotional stability that may help get over psychological disorders [28].”
From A Cloud-Based Virtual Reality App for a Novel Telemindfulness Service: Rationale, Design and Feasibility Evaluation (2017) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Multiple studies have found that mindfulness meditation training can result in reduced intensity, blunting, or complete loss of both positive and negative emotions and dissociation in some people [9,12,33,34,36].”
From Can mindfulness be too much of a good thing? The value of a middle way (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, meditation-induced dampening of the amygdala has been found to attenuate not just negative emotions but positive ones as well [34,35].”
From Can mindfulness be too much of a good thing? The value of a middle way (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
In the citing paper
“A frequently reported finding is that mindfulness practice is associated with a diminished activation of the amygdala in response to emotional stimuli during mindful states [24,25].”
From A translational neuroscience perspective on mindfulness meditation as a prevention strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“In a cross-sectional study, downregulation of the left amygdala was detected when viewing emotional pictures in a mindful state in beginner but not expert Zen meditators [25].”
From A translational neuroscience perspective on mindfulness meditation as a prevention strategy (2016) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“Taylor et al. compared Western EMs with novel meditators using emotional pictures during fMRI, and observed a decrease in activation levels of the PCC and MPFC (DMN) during active meditation in EMs.”
From Mindfulness and Emotion Regulation: Insights from Neurobiological, Psychological, and Clinical Studies (2017) · cites this paper as Taylor et al., 2011
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 18) = 0.45, p = .747
MinorThe paper reports p = .747 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .511. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .747 · recomputed p = .511
“F(1, 18) = 0.45, p = .747”
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 18) = 1.94, p = .17
MinorThe paper reports p = .17 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .181. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .17 · recomputed p = .181
“F(1, 18) = 1.94, p = .17”
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 18) = 5.40, p = .031
MinorThe paper reports p = .031 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .032. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .031 · recomputed p = .032
“F(1, 18) = 5.40, p = .031”
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 18) = 0.72, p = .382
MinorThe paper reports p = .382 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .407. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .382 · recomputed p = .407
“F(1, 18) = 0.72, p = .382”
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 18) = 6.23, p = .015
MinorThe paper reports p = .015 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .022. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .015 · recomputed p = .022
“F(1, 18) = 6.23, p = .015”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 18) = 0.72reported p = .382 · recomputed p = .407
“F(1, 18) = 0.72, p = .382”
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 18) = 0.45reported p = .747 · recomputed p = .511
“F(1, 18) = 0.45, p = .747”
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 18) = 1.94reported p = .17 · recomputed p = .181
“F(1, 18) = 1.94, p = .17”
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 18) = 6.23reported p = .015 · recomputed p = .022
“F(1, 18) = 6.23, p = .015”
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 18) = 5.4reported p = .031 · recomputed p = .032
“F(1, 18) = 5.40, p = .031”
- ConsistentF(1, 18) = 0.63reported p = .438 · recomputed p = .438
“F(1, 18) = 0.63, p = .438”
- ConsistentF(1, 18) = 6.23reported p = .022 · recomputed p = .022
“F(1, 18) = 6.23, p = .022”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition.
Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., et al. (2004) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bph077 · Cited by 7,234
Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review
Baer, R. A. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg015 · Cited by 4,577
Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review.
Baer, R. A. (2003) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/bpg015 · Cited by 4,576
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495
Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI
Phan, K. L., Wager, T., Taylor, S. F., & Liberzon, I. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1087 · Cited by 3,502
Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness
Critchley, H. D., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1176 · Cited by 3,406 · cited 1×
“This brain region plays an important role in awareness of interoceptive states (Craig, 2004; Critchley et al., 2004).”
BackgroundDifferential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning.
Phillips, R. G., & LeDoux, J. E. (1992) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.106.2.274 · Cited by 3,292
Handbook of emotion regulation
Gross, J. (2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.52-1127 · Cited by 3,283
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Talairach, 1988, Stereotaxic localization of central gray nuclei, Neurochirurgia (Stuttg), 1, 88
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–113 of 113
A neurobehavioral account for decentering as the salve for the distressed mind
King, A. P., & Fresco, D. M. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.009 · Cited by 36
Laurent, H. K., Laurent, S. M., Nelson, B., Wright, D. B., & De Araujo Sanchez, M.-A. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0377-0 · Cited by 31
The role of acceptance in mood improvement during Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction
Arlt Mutch, V. K., Evans, S., & Wyka, K. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23017 · Cited by 30
Cosme, D., & Wiens, S. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0119466 · Cited by 27
“Lastly, Taylor and colleagues [18] investigated mindful attention versus uninstructed attention to pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures in novice and experienced meditators, and used self-reported ratings of emotional intensity after each picture as a measure of affective reactivity.”
BackgroundExplanation of emotion regulation mechanism of mindfulness using a brain function model
Nakamura, H., Tawatsuji, Y., Fang, S., & Matsui, T. (2021) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.029 · Cited by 29
Dispositional mindfulness attenuates the emotional attentional blink
Makowski, D., Sperduti, M., Lavallée, S., Nicolas, S., & Piolino, P. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.004 · Cited by 28
Reduced fear-conditioned pain modulation in experienced meditators: a preliminary study
Taylor, V. A., Roy, M., Chang, L., Gill, L.-N., Mueller, C., & Rainville, P. (2018) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000634 · Cited by 15
Self-citationVarieties of attention in hypnosis and meditation
Lifshitz, M., Campbell, N. K. J., & Raz, A. (2012) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.05.008 · Cited by 19
Potential therapeutic effects of meditation for treating affective dysregulation
Leung, N. T. Y., Lo, M. M., & Lee, T. M. C. (2014) · Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2014/402718 · Cited by 14
“[33] revealed that mediators perceived pictures portraying positive and negative emotions to be less intense during a”
BackgroundZhou, B., Gek Mui, L., Li, J., & Hu, J. (2024) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108353 · Cited by 13
Mindfulness training modifies attentional bias to facial emotion and emotional symptoms
Kou, H., Luo, W., Liu, X., Ke, M., Xie, Q., Li, X., & Bi, T. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.020 · Cited by 11
Intervenciones Basadas en Mindfulness y Compasión en Dolor Crónico
Muñoz-Sanjosé, A., Palao Tarrero, Á., Torrijos Zarcero, M., María Del Río, M. D. R., & Rodríguez Vega, B. (2019) · Revista de Investigación y Educación en Ciencias de la Salud (RIECS) · doi:10.37536/riecs.2019.4.s1.130 · Cited by 6
Juneau, C., Bedi-Padda, T., Smyth, A., & Knäuper, B. (2025) · Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47219-0_59 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, V. A., Grant, J., Daneault, V., Scavone, G., Breton, E., Roffe-Vidal, S., Courtemanche, J., Lavarenne, A. S., & Beauregard, M.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Beauregard, Mario
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1524-1533
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123696958
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 25.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Keywords
- mindfulness meditation, emotional picture processing, default mode network, amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, mood disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Meditation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review