Cited by 339Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A NIRS-fMRI investigation of prefrontal cortex activity during a working memory task

Sato, Hiroki, Yahata, Noriaki, Funane, Tsukasa, Takizawa, Ryu, Katura, Takusige, Atsumori, Hirokazu, Nishimura, Yukika, Kinoshita, Akihide +4 more·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is commonly used for studying human brain function. However, several studies have shown that superficial hemodynamic changes such as skin blood flow can affect the prefrontal NIRS hemoglobin (Hb) signals. To examine the criterion-related validity of prefrontal NIRS-Hb signals, we focused on the functional signals during a working memory (WM) task and investigated their similarity with blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals simultaneously measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We also measured the skin blood flow with a laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF) at the same time to examine the effect of superficial hemodynamic changes on the NIRS-Hb signals. Correlation analysis demonstrated that temporal changes in the prefrontal NIRS-Hb signals in the activation area were significantly correlated with the BOLD signals in the gray matter rather than those in the soft tissue or the LDF signals. While care must be taken when comparing the NIRS-Hb signal with the extracranial BOLD or LDF signals, these results suggest that the NIRS-Hb signal mainly reflects hemodynamic changes in the gray matter. Moreover, the amplitudes of the task-related responses of the NIRS-Hb signals were significantly correlated with the BOLD signals in the gray matter across participants, which means participants with a stronger NIRS-Hb response showed a stronger BOLD response. These results thus provide supportive evidence that NIRS can be used to measure hemodynamic signals originating from prefrontal cortex activation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.043

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, H., Yahata, N., Funane, T., Takizawa, R., Katura, T., Atsumori, H., Nishimura, Y., Kinoshita, A., Kiguchi, M., Koizumi, H., Fukuda, M., & Kasai, K.
Affiliations
  • Hitachi (Japan) (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Gunma University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sato, Hiroki
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
83
Pages
158-173
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046254753
Cited by
339
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 5
FWCI
20.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
near-infrared spectroscopy, prefrontal cortex, working memory, BOLD signal, criterion validity, skin blood flow, laser Doppler flowmetry, hemodynamic response
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Oxygen Consumption, Sensitivity and Specificity, Task Performance and Analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Prefrontal Cortex, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review