Cited by 118Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionFace Recognition and Perception

Don’t stand so close to me: a behavioral and ERP study of preferred interpersonal distance

Perry, Anat, Rubinsten, Orly, Peled, Leehe, Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G.·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

The space between people, or interpersonal distance, creates and defines the dynamics of social interactions. Given that invasion of one's interpersonal space may trigger threat and anxiety, a critical question is if high vulnerability to social anxiety (SA) is associated with avoidance and attentional biases when anticipating invasion to one's interpersonal space. Therefore, the current study sought to examine the behavioral mechanisms, time course and neural correlates underlying the threat of interpersonal distance invasion with a focus on different SA levels, using both a behavioral and an ERP experiment. Preferred interpersonal distance was assessed using a paradigm that involves responding to different virtual protagonists (friend or stranger) approaching the participant by indicating where one would like the protagonist to stop. In addition, participants' level of social anxiety was measured. The behavioral experiment indicated that levels of SA predicted one's preferred interpersonal distance such that higher SA individuals preferred further distance from a stranger. At the neural level, across groups, early (N1) but not late (LPP) differences were found between stranger and friend conditions. Importantly, SA individuals were characterized by attenuated early ERP responses, suggesting less attentional resources allocated to social stimuli. The results suggest that high SA individuals feel discomfort earlier than others in social engagement, which may lead them to stand further away, thus creating less communicative social interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.042

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Levels of social anxiety are correlated with preferred interpersonal distance, such that individuals with greater social anxiety traits prefer to stay further away from others.

    “Recent research has shown that levels of social anxiety are correlated with preferred interpersonal distance, such that individuals with greater social anxiety traits prefer to stay further away from others (Scheele et al., 2012;Perry et al., 2013).”

    From OT promotes closer interpersonal distance among highly empathic individuals (2015) · cites this paper as Perry et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perry, A., Rubinsten, O., Peled, L., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Perry, Anat
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
83
Pages
761-769
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156484943
Cited by
118
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
interpersonal distance, social anxiety, threat anticipation, attentional bias, N1 component, late positive potential, social interaction, virtual characters
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Brain, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review