Cited by 67Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Interpersonal distance during real-time social interaction: insights from subjective experience, behavior, and physiology

Open access
Kroczek, Leon O. H., Pfaller, Michael, Lange, Bastian, Müller, Mathias, Mühlberger, Andreas·2020·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Physical distance is a prominent feature in face-to-face social interactions and allows regulating social encounters. Close interpersonal distance (IPD) increases emotional responses during interaction and has been related to avoidance behavior in social anxiety. However, a systematic investigation of the effects of IPD on subjective experience combined with measures of physiological arousal and behavioral responses during real-time social interaction has been missing. Virtual Reality allows for a controlled manipulation of IPD while maintaining naturalistic social encounters. The present study investigates IPD in social interaction using a novel paradigm in Virtual Reality. Thirty-six participants approached virtual agents and engaged in short interactions. IPD was varied between 3.5 and 1 m by manipulating the distance at which agents reacted to the participant's approach. Closer distances were rated as more arousing, less pleasant, and less natural than longer distances and this effect was significantly modulated by social anxiety scores. Skin conductance responses were also increased at short distances compared to longer distances. Finally, an interaction of IPD and social anxiety was observed for avoidance behavior, measured as participants' backward motion during interaction, with stronger avoidance related to close distances and high values of social anxiety. These results highlight the influence of IPD on experience, physiological response, and behavior during social interaction. The interaction of social anxiety and IPD suggests including the manipulation of IPD in behavioral tests in Virtual Reality as a promising tool for the treatment of social anxiety disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00561

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strict standardization of exposures across patients allows closer examination of core mechanisms of therapeutic change, identification of key elements of the exposure experience, and correlation with behavioral or physiological data at high temporal resolution.

    “This way, the strict standardization of exposures across patients allows to more closely examine the core mechanisms that drive therapeutic change in exposure therapy, to identify key elements of the exposure experience, and to correlate them with behavioral or physiological data at an immense temporal resolution that would be impossible in most in vivo settings (cf. Kroczek et al., 2020).”

    From Virtual Reality exposure therapy in the treatment of public speaking anxiety and social anxiety disorder (2024) · cites this paper as Kroczek et al., 2020

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]Mori M The Uncanny Valley: The Original Essay by Masahiro Mori - IEEE Spectrum. Energy (1970).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kroczek, L. O. H., Pfaller, M., Lange, B., Müller, M., & Mühlberger, A.
Affiliations
University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Kroczek, Leon O. H.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2020-06-12
Volume
11
Pages
561-561
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034475656
Cited by
67
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (16SV7839K)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
interpersonal distance, social anxiety, social anxiety disorder, virtual reality, virtual agents, skin conductance, physiological arousal, avoidance behavior, subjective experience, face-to-face social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review