Cited by 298Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Oxytocin Modulates Social Distance between Males and Females

Open access
Scheele, Dirk, Striepens, Nadine, Güntürkün, Onur, Deutschländer, Sandra, Maier, Wolfgang, Kendrick, Keith M., Hurlemann, René·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

In humans, interpersonal romantic attraction and the subsequent development of monogamous pair-bonds is substantially predicted by influential impressions formed during first encounters. The prosocial neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) has been identified as a key facilitator of both interpersonal attraction and the formation of parental attachment. However, whether OXT contributes to the maintenance of monogamous bonds after they have been formed is unclear. In this randomized placebo-controlled trial, we provide the first behavioral evidence that the intranasal administration of OXT stimulates men in a monogamous relationship, but not single ones, to keep a much greater distance (∼10–15 cm) between themselves and an attractive woman during a first encounter. This avoidance of close personal proximity occurred in the physical presence of female but not male experimenters and was independent of gaze direction and whether the female experimenter or the subject was moving. We further confirmed this unexpected finding using a photograph-based approach/avoidance task that showed again that OXT only stimulated men in a monogamous relationship to approach pictures of attractive women more slowly. Importantly, these changes cannot be attributed to OXT altering the attitude of monogamous men toward attractive women or their judgments of and arousal by pictures of them. Together, our results suggest that where OXT release is stimulated during a monogamous relationship, it may additionally promote its maintenance by making men avoid signaling romantic interest to other women through close-approach behavior during social encounters. In this way, OXT may help to promote fidelity within monogamous human relationships.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a randomized placebo-controlled trial, intranasal oxytocin selectively increased the physical distance that pair-bonded men kept from an attractive female experimenter and slowed their approach to pictures of attractive women, without affecting single men. The authors interpret this as evidence that oxytocin may promote fidelity by reducing close-approach behavior toward other women in monogamous men.

Key findings

  • In the stop-distance paradigm, oxytocin increased personal space in pair-bonded men but not single men: repeated-measures ANOVA showed a treatment × relationship-status interaction, \(F(1,53)=4.73\), \(p=0.03\); post hoc tests were significant for pair-bonded men, \(t(28)=-4.07\), \(p<0.01\), but not singles, \(t(25)=-0.72\), \(p=0.48\). The abstract reports a roughly 10–15 cm greater distance.
  • The effect was specific to a female experimenter: in the male-experimenter control, main and interaction effects seen with the female experimenter were absent (all \(ps \ge 0.09\)); overall oxytocin enlarged social distance with the female experimenter (\(p<0.01\)) but not the male experimenter (\(p=0.11\)).
  • In the approach/avoidance task, oxytocin selectively slowed approach to positive social pictures in pair-bonded men: treatment × relationship-status interaction, \(F(1,53)=4.40\), \(p=0.04\); post hoc pair-bonded \(t(28)=-2.17\), \(p=0.04\), singles \(t(25)=0.81\), \(p=0.42\). Pair-bonded men also made more errors only for positive social pictures, \(U=64\), \(z=-2.09\), \(p=0.04\).
  • Oxytocin did not alter impressions or arousal: all subjects rated the female experimenter as highly likeable (\(8.46 \pm 0.66\)) and trustworthy (\(8.37 \pm 0.72\)), and valence/arousal ratings were comparable across groups (all \(ps \ge 0.08\)).

Methods

  • Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel-group design. A total of 86 healthy heterosexual male adults participated. Experiments 1 and 2 included 57 men (mean age \(25.1 \pm 3.3\) years), either single (\(n=27\)) or in a stable monogamous relationship (\(n=30\)); they received intranasal oxytocin (24 IU) or placebo 45 min before testing. An independent control experiment included 29 pair-bonded men (\(25.9 \pm 3.2\) years; oxytocin \(n=14\), placebo \(n=15\)) with a male experimenter.
  • Experiment 1 used an adapted stop-distance paradigm with an attractive female experimenter, varying who moved, starting position, and eye contact; ideal and slightly uncomfortable chin-to-chin distances were measured with a digital laser measurer.
  • Experiment 2 used an approach/avoidance task with IAPS pictures; participants pulled a joystick toward positive pictures or pushed away from negative pictures, with reaction times and errors recorded. Analyses used repeated-measures/mixed-model ANOVA, post hoc unpaired \(t\) tests, and Mann–Whitney tests.

Limitations

  • The paper states that future studies are needed to elucidate the exact neurochemical cascade underlying the oxytocin effect and to analyze which aspects of a pair-bond interact with oxytocin to promote fidelity.
  • The paper notes that an apparent oxytocin effect in single men was likely caused by outliers, given the three times larger variance in oxytocin-treated singles (\(SD=29.03\)) compared with pair-bonded men (\(SD=9.41\)) and the absence of overall interactions with starting position or eye contact.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was restricted to healthy heterosexual men, so generalizability to women, non-heterosexual individuals, clinical populations, or other relationship arrangements is unknown; the tasks were laboratory-based first encounters and picture judgments, not direct measures of real-world fidelity.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2755-12.2012

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

6 of 25 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationcitation

    The absence of any interaction between OXT and gaze direction supports the notion that the intrinsic reward value of other women remains constant.

    “The notion that the intrinsic reward value of other women remains constant is further supported by the absence of any interaction between OXT and gaze direction, since returned eye gaze from an attractive person is associated with a higher reward value than averted gaze when a social interaction is initiated (Kampe et al., 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kampe et al., 2001 source
  • Findingown data

    The OXT-induced avoidance of close personal proximity in pair-bonded men occurred in the physical presence of female but not male experimenters.

    “This avoidance of close personal proximity occurred in the physical presence of female but not male experimenters and was independent of gaze direction and whether the female experimenter or the subject was moving.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Overall, OXT significantly enlarged social distance (across all conditions) in the physical presence of a female experimenter ( p Ͻ 0.01), but not of a male experimenter ( p ϭ 0.11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    OXT only stimulated men in a monogamous relationship to approach pictures of attractive women more slowly in the approach/avoidance task.

    “We further confirmed this unexpected finding using a photograph-based approach/ avoidance task that showed again that OXT only stimulated men in a monogamous relationship to approach pictures of attractive women more slowly.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Post hoc unpaired t tests showed that the reaction time was significantly increased in pair-bonded men (t (28) ϭ Ϫ2.17, p ϭ 0.04, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.14) but not in single ones (t (25) ϭ 0.81, p ϭ 0.42, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.03).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In Experiment 2, there was a significant interaction between content, treatment, and relationship status on reaction time.

    “a mixed-model ANOVA for repeated measurements with”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Personal space was larger when subjects were moving away from rather than toward the experimenter.

    “Indeed, PS was larger when subjects were moving away (65.12 Ϯ 14.62 cm) from rather than toward (57.81 Ϯ 13.51 cm) the experimenter, suggesting that a proximal starting position was felt as more unpleasant than a distal one.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The amygdala may be important for the regulation of personal space.

    “The amygdala may be important for this regulation (Kennedy et al., 2009)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kennedy et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXT promotes the formation of pair-bonds in females, while arginine vasopressin is more important in males.

    “Research on monogamous mammals, particularly prairie voles, has shown that the neuropeptide oxytocin (OXT) promotes the formation of pair-bonds in females, with a related peptide, argininevasopressin being more important in males (Donaldson and Young, 2008;Insel, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Donaldson and Young, 2008 source
    • cites Insel, 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    OXT-induced analgesia in mice is mediated by vasopressin-1A receptors.

    “Future studies are needed to elucidate the exact neurochemical cascade underlying the observed OXT effect on approach behavior since OXT-induced analgesia in mice, for example, is mediated by vasopressin-1A receptors (Schorscher-Petcu et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schorscher-Petcu et al., 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXT often facilitates approach behaviors, although this can be context- and person-dependent.

    “The prosocial actions of OXT often involve facilitation of approach behaviors (Hurlemann et al., 2010;Kemp and Guastella, 2011;Striepens et al., 2011), although this can be context-and person-dependent (Bartz et al., 2011)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hurlemann et al., 2010 source

      The Introduction describes oxytocin as facilitating bonding and trust, and the Discussion reports enhanced socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in men. These support a prosocial effect, but the paper does not establish that the effect operates by facilitating approach behaviors. The context- and person-dependent qualification is attributed to Bartz et al., not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Kemp and Guastella, 2011 source
    • cites Striepens et al., 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Basal concentrations of OXT in blood are increased in couples during the early stages of romantic love and stay significantly elevated in couples remaining together 6 months later.

    “While, compared with singles, basal concentrations of OXT in blood are increased in couples during the early stages of romantic love and stay significantly elevated in couples remaining together 6 months later (Schneiderman et al., 2012), our results suggest that further augmentation of endogenous OXT release is necessary to produce fidelity-enhancing effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schneiderman et al., 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    OXT did not alter the attitude of monogamous men toward attractive women or their judgments of and arousal by pictures of them.

    “Importantly, these changes cannot be attributed to OXT altering the attitude of monogamous men toward attractive women or their judgments of and arousal by pictures of them.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “There was no evidence for significant changes in emotional responsiveness to the pictures since the valence and arousal ratings were comparable across groups (all ps Ն 0.08).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The OXT effect on personal space in pair-bonded men was independent of gaze direction and of whether the female experimenter or the subject was moving.

    “This avoidance of close personal proximity occurred in the physical presence of female but not male experimenters and was independent of gaze direction and whether the female experimenter or the subject was moving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Intranasal oxytocin (OXT) administration stimulates men in a monogamous relationship, but not single men, to keep a greater distance (approximately 10-15 cm) between themselves and an attractive woman during a first encounter.

    “we provide the first behavioral evidence that the intranasal administration of OXT stimulates men in a monogamous relationship, but not single ones, to keep a much greater distance (ϳ10 -15 cm) between themselves and an attractive woman during a first encounter.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Post hoc unpaired t tests showed that PS was significantly increased in pair-bonded men (t (28) ϭ Ϫ4.07, p Ͻ 0.01, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.37) but not in single men (t (25) ϭ Ϫ0.72, p ϭ 0.48, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pair-bonded men kept more distance than singles, and this difference depended on the person moving.

    “Finally, there was an effect of relationship status, with pairbonded men keeping more distance than singles and which also depended on the person moving (F (1,53) ϭ 6.17, p ϭ 0.02, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Pair-bonded men reported feeling uncomfortable at a greater distance from the female experimenter under OXT, but only if the experimenter was moving and not if the subject was moving.

    “However, an exploratory analysis revealed that pairbonded men reported feeling uncomfortable at a greater distance from the female experimenter under OXT, but only if the latter was the one moving (t (28) ϭ Ϫ3.43, p Ͻ 0.01, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.30) and not if the subject was (t (20.50) ϭ Ϫ1.97, p ϭ 0.06, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For slightly uncomfortable distance, there was a main effect of treatment but not of relationship status or interaction.

    “Interestingly, a mixed-model ANOVA for repeated measures with”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Valence and arousal ratings were comparable across groups, indicating no significant changes in emotional responsiveness to the pictures.

    “There was no evidence for significant changes in emotional responsiveness to the pictures since the valence and arousal ratings were comparable across groups (all ps Ն 0.08).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All subjects rated the experimenter as highly likeable and trustworthy, but after controlling for multiple comparisons, there was no significant main or interaction effect of OXT and relationship status on reported feelings.

    “All subjects rated the experimenter as highly likeable (8.46 Ϯ 0.66) and trustworthy (8.37 Ϯ 0.72), but after controlling for multiple comparisons (six ratings), we found no significant main or interaction effect of OXT and relationship status on reported feelings (all ps Ն 0.08).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants in the control experiment rated the female experimenter as attractive, independent of treatment.

    “Participants of the control experiment rated the female experimenter (Experiment 1) as attractive (64.10 Ϯ 14.77), independent of treatment (t (27) ϭ Ϫ0.81, p ϭ 0.42, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.02).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reaction time was significantly increased in pair-bonded men but not in single men following OXT treatment in the positive social condition.

    “Post hoc unpaired t tests showed that the reaction time was significantly increased in pair-bonded men (t (28) ϭ Ϫ2.17, p ϭ 0.04, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.14) but not in single ones (t (25) ϭ 0.81, p ϭ 0.42, ␩ 2 ϭ 0.03).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Personal space is influenced by relationships, with a closer intimate zone reserved for lovers.

    “The personal space (PS) we keep between us and others is crucially influenced by our relationships with them; a closer, intimate zone being reserved for lovers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hall, 1966

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hayduk, 1983 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    If an unfamiliar person violates personal space, we can feel uncomfortable, so close approach must be carefully controlled.

    “However, if an unfamiliar person violates our PS (Hall, 1966;Hayduk, 1983), we can feel uncomfortable, and so close approach must be carefully controlled.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hall, 1966

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hayduk, 1983 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    To date, there has been no direct evidence that OXT release after the formation of monogamous bonds contributes to their subsequent maintenance.

    “To date, there has been no direct evidence that OXT release after the formation of monogamous bonds actually contributes to their subsequent maintenance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Activity of amygdala subregions is modulated by OXT.

    “and the activity of amygdala subregions is also modulated by OXT (Gamer et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gamer et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    We tend to expand our personal space if a person establishes eye contact with us.

    “and we tend to expand our PS if a person establishes eye-contact with us (Argyle and Dean, 1965).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Argyle and Dean, 1965 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Monogamy evolves in species to help ensure offspring survival, despite being reproductively costly for males.

    “Humans and other mammalian species exhibiting monogamous pair-bonds also show biparental behavior, leading to the theory that while reproductively costly for males, monogamy evolves in species to help ensure offspring survival (Low, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Low, 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants were asked to maintain regular sleep and waking times and to abstain from caffeine and alcohol on the day of the experiment.

    “The participants were asked to maintain their regular sleep and waking times and to abstain from caffeine and alcohol intake on the day of the experiment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The pictures of the approach/avoidance task were adjusted to closely resemble each other in luminance.

    “The pictures of the task were adjusted to closely resemble each other in luminance using a self-written script in Matlab 7 (MathWorks).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Subjects were free of current and past physical or psychiatric illness, as assessed by medical history and SCID-I/SCID-II.

    “Subjects were free of current and past physical or psychiatric illness, as assessed by medical history and a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV axis I (SCID-I) and axis II disorders (SCID-II).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The experimenter's appearance was kept the same across all sessions, and all subjects were tested in the same room.

    “Care was taken to assure the same appearance of the experimenter across all sessions, and all subjects were tested in the same room.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The most obvious physiological stimulus for promoting endogenous OXT release in men would be having sex with their mate, and the simple close presence and touch of their partner might also suffice.

    “While the most obvious physiological stimulus for promoting endogenous OXT release in men would be having sex with their mate (Kru ¨ger et al., 2003), the simple close presence and touch of their partner at any given moment in time might also suffice (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kru ¨ger et al., 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Holt-Lunstad et al., 2008 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study avoided measurements that could prime social norms and raise suspicion regarding the hypothesis.

    “Thus, we avoided any measure-ments that could prime social norms and raise suspicion regarding our hypothesis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    There were no significant between-group differences for any of the parameters listed in Table 2.

    “There were no significant between-group differences for any of the parameters listed in this table (all ps Ͼ 0.05).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    OXT treatment selectively impeded approach behavior toward attractive females in pair-bonded males during a first social encounter and in the context of erotic IAPS pictures, without altering their judgments of how likeable or arousing the females were.

    “Overall, these results demonstrate that OXT treatment selectively impeded approach behavior toward attractive females in pair-bonded males either during a first social encounter (Experiment 1) or in the context of erotic IAPS pictures (Experiment 2), but without altering their judgments of how likeable or arousing the females were.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    OXT can promote risk aversion and noncooperation toward individuals perceived as outsiders.

    “since OXT can also promote risk aversion (Declerck et al., 2010) and noncooperation toward individuals perceived as outsiders (De Dreu, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Declerck et al., 2010 source
    • cites De Dreu, 2012 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants were naive to prescription-strength psychoactive medication and had not taken any over-the-counter psychoactive medication in the past 4 weeks.

    “In addition, they were naive to prescription-strength psychoactive medication and had not taken any over-the-counter psychoactive medication in the past 4 weeks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    There were neither main nor interaction effects of treatment and relationship status for any of the parameters listed in Table 1.

    “There were neither main nor interaction effects of treatment and relationship status (all ps Ͼ 0.05) for any of the parameters listed in this table.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn and performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

    “The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn and was performed in compliance with the latest revision of the Declaration of Helsinki.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All subjects completed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to control for possible pretreatment differences in cognitive performance.

    “All subjects completed a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to control for possible pretreatment differences in cognitive performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study used a double-blind, randomized, parallel group design with intranasal OXT or placebo.

    “Using a double-blind, randomized, parallel group design, we administered either intranasal OXT (24 IU, Syntocinon-Spray, Novartis; 3 puffs per nostril, each with 4 IU OXT) or placebo (PLC; sodium chloride solution) to 57 healthy heterosexual male volunteers”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
35 of 35
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Approach behavior is important for displaying potential romantic interest.

    “although approach behavior is clearly important for displaying potential romantic interest.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants classified as in a stable monogamous relationship are actually in a stable monogamous relationship.

    “who were either single (n ϭ 27) or in a stable monogamous relationship (n ϭ 30)”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The positive social pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System are perceived as attractive women or erotic stimuli by the participants.

    “positive (attractive women or beautiful landscapes) and negative (mutilations or dirt) pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS)”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxytocin has been shown to reduce anxiety and stress; boost trust, eye-contact, mind-reading, and empathy; heighten the availability of positive relationship memories; and improve social attention, recognition, appraisals, and encoding/retrieval of memories with social content.

    “Specifically, oxytocin has been shown to reduce anxiety and stress [52-54]; boost trust [55-57**], eye-contact [58], mind-reading [59], and empathy [60]; heighten the availability of positive relationship memories [61, 62]; and improve social attention, recognition, and appraisals, as well as the encoding and retrieval of memories with social content [63**].”

    From Could intranasal oxytocin be used to enhance relationships? Research imperatives, clinical policy, and ethical considerations (2013) · cites this paper as [54]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Oxytocin may play a specific role in maintaining long-term pair bonding in humans, as also suggested by prior evidence that it increases relationship men's distance from attractive female strangers.

    “The notion that OXT may play a specific role in maintaining long-term pair bonding in humans is also substantiated by our previous findings that it makes men in a relationship keep a greater social distance from attractive female strangers (29)”
  • Intranasal oxytocin may facilitate fidelity in men in monogamous relationships by increasing their distance from other women.

    “and may facilitate the fidelity of men in a monogamous relationship by making them keep a greater distance from other women (29).”
  • Male subjects in long-term relationships were slower to approach photos of attractive women compared to single male subjects, and IN-OT increased this effect.

    “Interestingly, male subjects in long-term relationships were also slower to approach photos of attractive women, as compared to single male subjects, and IN-OT increased this effect.”
  • Men in long-term relationships kept a greater distance from an attractive female confederate than single men, and this was enhanced by IN-OT.

    “Men in relationships kept a greater distance from the female confederate than single men, and this was enhanced by IN-OT.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Control-experiment treatment counts are reversed

    Minor

    The methods assign 14 control-experiment participants to OXT and 15 to placebo, whereas Tables 2 and 3 assign 15 to OXT and 14 to placebo.

  • Digit-span standard deviation exceeds the possible range

    Minor

    Table 2 reports a mean of 8.21 and an SD of 8.54 for the 15-person OXT group, although the stated maximum score is 14. For 15 nonnegative scores capped at 14 with that mean, the sample SD cannot exceed approximately 7.14.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scheele, D., Striepens, N., Güntürkün, O., Deutschländer, S., Maier, W., Kendrick, K. M., & Hurlemann, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-11-14
Volume
32
Issue
46
Pages
16074-16079
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2079180428
Cited by
298
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 3
FWCI
38.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, social distance, monogamous relationships, romantic attraction, pair bonding, fidelity, intranasal administration, approach-avoidance behavior
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Avoidance Learning, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review