Cited by 450Memory and Neural MechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Personal space regulation by the human amygdala

Open access
Kennedy, Daniel P, Gläscher, Jan, Tyszka, J Michael, Adolphs, Ralph·2009·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The amygdala plays key roles in emotion and social cognition, but how this translates to face-to-face interactions involving real people remains unknown. We found that an individual with complete amygdala lesions lacked any sense of personal space. Furthermore, healthy individuals showed amygdala activation upon close personal proximity. The amygdala may be required to trigger the strong emotional reactions normally following personal space violations, thus regulating interpersonal distance in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2381

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with bilateral amygdala lesions show a marked reduction of interpersonal distance.

    “Patients with bilateral amygdala lesions show a marked reduction of interpersonal distance (Kennedy et al., 2009).”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Kennedy et al., 2009

    The paper’s Abstract reports that SM, a patient with complete bilateral amygdala damage, preferred a significantly smaller interpersonal distance than comparison subjects (0.34 m versus 0.76 m). The claim generalizes this finding to patients in the plural, but the paper studied only one lesion patient. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The distance governing social interactions is ubiquitous, present with some variations across the animal kingdom and in humans.

    “This distance governing social interactions is a ubiquitous entity, present with some variations across the animal kingdom and in humans”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Kennedy, Gl€ ascher, Tyszka, & Adolphs, 2009

  • The amygdala may be important for the regulation of personal space.

    “The amygdala may be important for this regulation (Kennedy et al., 2009)”

    From Oxytocin Modulates Social Distance between Males and Females (2012) · cites this paper as Kennedy et al., 2009

  • Amygdala damage affects subtle social skills such as personal space and eye contact during conversations.

    “amygdala damage affects subtle social skills such as people’s sense of personal space [34] or their use of eye contact during conversations [35]”

    From The social motivation theory of autism (2012) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Amygdala lesions dramatically reduce the need for interpersonal distance, and amygdala activity in healthy individuals is correlated with feeling uncomfortable at a close interpersonal distance.

    “Research has shown that lesions to the amygdala dramatically reduce the need for interpersonal distance, and that amygdala activity in healthy individuals is correlated with feeling uncomfortable at a close interpersonal distance (Kennedy et al., 2009).”

    From OT promotes closer interpersonal distance among highly empathic individuals (2015) · cites this paper as Kennedy et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, D. P., Gläscher, J., Tyszka, J. M., & Adolphs, R.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Daniel P
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2009-08-30
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
1226-1227
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2126866281
Cited by
450
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080721)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS019632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
personal space, amygdala, interpersonal distance, social cognition, social interaction, amygdala activation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Brain Injuries, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review