Cited by 46Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Optimization of large-scale mouse brain connectome via joint evaluation of DTI and neuron tracing data

Open access
Chen, Hanbo, Liu, Tao, Zhao, Yu, Zhang, Tuo, Li, Yujie, Li, Meng, Zhang, Hongmiao, Kuang, Hui +3 more·2015·NeuroImage

Abstract

Tractography based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data has been used as a tool by a large number of recent studies to investigate structural connectome. Despite its great success in offering unique 3D neuroanatomy information, DTI is an indirect observation with limited resolution and accuracy and its reliability is still unclear. Thus, it is essential to answer this fundamental question: how reliable is DTI tractography in constructing large-scale connectome? To answer this question, we employed neuron tracing data of 1772 experiments on the mouse brain released by the Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas (AMCA) as the ground-truth to assess the performance of DTI tractography in inferring white matter fiber pathways and inter-regional connections. For the first time in the neuroimaging field, the performance of whole brain DTI tractography in constructing a large-scale connectome has been evaluated by comparison with tracing data. Our results suggested that only with the optimized tractography parameters and the appropriate scale of brain parcellation scheme, can DTI produce relatively reliable fiber pathways and a large-scale connectome. Meanwhile, a considerable amount of errors were also identified in optimized DTI tractography results, which we believe could be potentially alleviated by efforts in developing better DTI tractography approaches. In this scenario, our framework could serve as a reliable and quantitative test bed to identify errors in tractography results which will facilitate the development of such novel tractography algorithms and the selection of optimal parameters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.050

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opting against SIFT2 provides a more direct comparison between our results and similar studies that used Allen tracer data without reference to spatial embedding.

    “This also provides a more direct comparison between our results and those of similar studies that have used the Allen tracer data to benchmark tractography performance without reference to the role of spatial embedding (Aydogan et al., 2018; Calabrese et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2015).”

    From The role of spatial embedding in mouse brain networks constructed from diffusion tractography and tracer injections (2021) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2015

    The Introduction and Methods §2.1 identify the Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas tracer data as the benchmark for evaluating DTI tractography. But Results §3.1 examines how streamline length affects accuracy, and §3.3 compares performance across anatomical locations. The description of the study as proceeding without reference to spatial factors is therefore too broad; the paper does not address the citing authors’ decision against SIFT2. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The overall results confirm previously reported trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity of tract reconstructions across tractography methods.

    “As such, our overall results confirm previously reported trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity of tract reconstructions across tractography methods (Bastiani et al. 2012; Thomas et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2015; Donahue et al. 2016).”

    From Diffusion MRI-based cortical connectome reconstruction: dependency on tractography procedures and neuroanatomical characteristics (2018) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2015

    The Results (§3.1) explicitly report a sensitivity–specificity trade-off when tuning fiber-number thresholds and DTI tractography parameters, and say it agrees with previous findings. Chen et al. do not establish that trade-off across different tractography methods; their analysis concerns parameter choices within DTI tractography. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The FA threshold had significantly more effect on connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity than the step size and angle threshold.

    “The FA threshold had significantly more effect on connectome reconstruction sensitivity and specificity than the step size and angle threshold, in line with previous research (Azadbakht et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2015).”

    From Diffusion MRI-based cortical connectome reconstruction: dependency on tractography procedures and neuroanatomical characteristics (2018) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2015

    Results §3.1 says the FA threshold had more impact on the reconstructed connectome than the angular threshold, and describes a sensitivity–specificity tradeoff when parameters were varied. Methods §2.2 evaluates FA and angular thresholds, but not step size; the cited passages also do not establish that the difference was statistically significant. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An increasing FA threshold negatively influenced sensitivity and the Jaccard index.

    “In fact, an increasing FA threshold negatively influenced sensitivity and the Jaccard index, suggesting that an FA threshold should be omitted for this type of datasets and analyses (Azadbakht et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2015).”

    From Diffusion MRI-based cortical connectome reconstruction: dependency on tractography procedures and neuroanatomical characteristics (2018) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2015

    Results §3.1 reports that smaller FA thresholds gave higher AUCs and that more restrictive tractography thresholds missed more connections, consistent with reduced sensitivity. The paper does not report a Jaccard index. Its Discussion §4 identifies an FA threshold of 0.1 as best for its mouse-brain data, rather than recommending that the threshold be omitted. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thomas C Ye FQ Irfanoglu MO Modi P Saleem KS Leopold DA Pierpaoli C 2014 Anatomical accuracy of brain connections derived from diffusion MRI tractography is inherently limited Proc Natl Acad Sci 111 16574 16579 10.1073/pnas.1405672111 25368179 PMC4246325 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, H., Liu, T., Zhao, Y., Zhang, T., Li, Y., Li, M., Zhang, H., Kuang, H., Guo, L., Tsien, J. Z., & Liu, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • North China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tsien, Joe Z.
  • Liu, Tianming
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
115
Pages
202-213
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014292780
Cited by
46
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG042599)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA033393)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
diffusion tensor imaging, tractography, neural tracing, structural connectome, brain parcellation, Allen Mouse Brain Connectivity Atlas, whole-brain connectome
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Atlases as Topic, Brain, Brain Mapping, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Nerve Fibers, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Mice, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review