Cited by 264Language and cultural evolutionPrimate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 256 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social Cognition and the Evolution of Language: Constructing Cognitive Phylogenies

Open access

Abstract

Human language and social cognition are closely linked: advanced social cognition is necessary for children to acquire language, and language allows forms of social understanding (and, more broadly, culture) that would otherwise be impossible. Both "language" and "social cognition" are complex constructs, involving many independent cognitive mechanisms, and the comparative approach provides a powerful route to understanding the evolution of such mechanisms. We provide a broad comparative review of mechanisms underlying social intelligence in vertebrates, with the goal of determining which human mechanisms are broadly shared, which have evolved in parallel in other clades, and which, potentially, are uniquely developed in our species. We emphasize the importance of convergent evolution for testing hypotheses about neural mechanisms and their evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.011

Cites

256 of 256 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 257 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fitch, W. T., Huber, L., & Bugnyar, T.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Fitch, W. Tecumseh
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
65
Issue
6
Pages
795-814
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141160550
Cited by
264
References
257
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
17.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social cognition, language evolution, social intelligence, vertebrates, convergent evolution, comparative cognition, language acquisition, culture
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Cultural Evolution, Humans, Language, Phylogeny, Species Specificity, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review