The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcriptional Architecture of the Primate Neocortex
Open accessAbstract
Genome-wide transcriptional profiling was used to characterize the molecular underpinnings of neocortical organization in rhesus macaque, including cortical areal specialization and laminar cell-type diversity. Microarray analysis of individual cortical layers across sensorimotor and association cortices identified robust and specific molecular signatures for individual cortical layers and areas, prominently involving genes associated with specialized neuronal function. Overall, transcriptome-based relationships were related to spatial proximity, being strongest between neighboring cortical areas and between proximal layers. Primary visual cortex (V1) displayed the most distinctive gene expression compared to other cortical regions in rhesus and human, both in the specialized layer 4 as well as other layers. Laminar patterns were more similar between macaque and human compared to mouse, as was the unique V1 profile that was not observed in mouse. These data provide a unique resource detailing neocortical transcription patterns in a nonhuman primate with great similarity in gene expression to human.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“expression in human differs from that in mouse (Fig. 5d) and rhesus monkey (Fig. 5e), where CALB1 is robustly expressed in CA1 and CA2 in addition to dentate gyrus.”
From An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome (2012) · cites this paper as [23]
In the citing paper
“In contrast, the mouse neocortex transcriptome is markedly different from the primate transcriptome.”
From Genetic Changes Shaping the Human Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Bernard et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository
Edgar, R. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.207 · Cited by 13,288
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data
Irizarry, R. A. (2003) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249 · Cited by 10,603
A General Framework for Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis
Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2005) · Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1128 · Cited by 5,684
Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain
Lein, E. S., Hawrylycz, M. J., Ao, N., Ayres, M., Bensinger, A., Bernard, A., Boe, A. F., Boguski, M. S., Brockway, K. S., Byrnes, E. J., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05453 · Cited by 5,572
Self-citationKing, M.-C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090005 · Cited by 2,815
Bassett, D. S., & Bullmore, E. (2006) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858406293182 · Cited by 2,600
(1909) · Cited by 2,575
Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain
Kang, H. J., Kawasawa, Y. I., Cheng, F., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Li, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Pletikos, M., Meyer, K. A., Sedmak, G., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10523 · Cited by 2,084
Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R
Langfelder, P., Zhang, B., & Horvath, S. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm563 · Cited by 1,892
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome
Hawrylycz, M. J., Lein, E. S., Guillozet-Bongaarts, A. L., Shen, E. H., Ng, L., Miller, J. A., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Smith, K. A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11405 · Cited by 3,083
Self-citationTranscriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain
Miller, J. A., Ding, S.-L., Sunkin, S. M., Smith, K. A., Ng, L., Szafer, A., Ebbert, A., Riley, Z. L., Royall, J. J., Aiona, K., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13185 · Cited by 1,325
Self-citationIntegrative functional genomic analyses implicate specific molecular pathways and circuits in autism
Parikshak, N. N., Luo, R., Zhang, A., Won, H., Lowe, J. K., Chandran, V., Horvath, S., & Geschwind, D. H. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.031 · Cited by 1,039
Self-citationComparative cellular analysis of motor cortex in human, marmoset and mouse
Bakken, T. E., Jorstad, N. L., Hu, Q., Lake, B. B., Tian, W., Kalmbach, B. E., Crow, M., Hodge, R. D., Krienen, F. M., Sorensen, S. A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03465-8 · Cited by 812
Self-citationAnatomy of hierarchy: Feedforward and feedback pathways in macaque visual cortex
Markov, N. T., Vezoli, J., Chameau, P., Falchier, A., Quilodran, R., Huissoud, C., Lamy, C., Misery, P., Giroud, P., Ullman, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23458 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernard, A., Lubbers, L. S., Tanis, K. Q., Luo, R., Podtelezhnikov, A. A., Finney, E. M., McWhorter, M. M. E., Serikawa, K., Lemon, T., Morgan, R., Copeland, C., Smith, K., Cullen, V., Davis-Turak, J., Lee, C.-K., Sunkin, S. M., Loboda, A. P., Levine, D. M., Stone, D. J., Hawrylycz, M. J., Roberts, C. J., Jones, A. R., Geschwind, D. H., & Lein, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Brain Science (US)
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lein, Ed S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1083-1099
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3628746
- OpenAlex
- W2064274168
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH060233)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- neocortex, rhesus monkeys, cortical transcriptome, cortical laminar organization, primary visual cortex, layer 4, sensorimotor cortex, association cortex, primate evolution, human-macaque comparison, mouse comparison, gene expression signatures
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Female, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Male, Membrane Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Transcription Factors, Neocortex, Principal Component Analysis, Microdissection, Microarray Analysis, Mice, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
