Cited by 115Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The Neuron Identity Problem: Form Meets Function

Open access
Fishell, Gord, Heintz, Nathaniel·2013·Neuron

Abstract

A complete understanding of nervous system function cannot be achieved without the identification of its component cell types. In this Perspective, we explore a series of related issues surrounding cell identity and how revolutionary methods for labeling and probing specific neuronal types have clarified this question. Specifically, we ask the following questions: what is the purpose of such diversity, how is it generated, how is it maintained, and, ultimately, how can one unambiguously identity one cell type from another? We suggest that each cell type can be defined by a unique and conserved molecular ground state that determines its capabilities. We believe that gaining an understanding of these molecular barcodes will advance our ability to explore brain function, enhance our understanding of the biochemical basis of CNS disorders, and aid in the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.035

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transcriptomic data from development appear consistent with the idea that early development is dominated by transcription-factor cascades and positive feedback, which later give way to activity-dependent feedback that refines neuronal form and synaptic connections.

    “Developmental transcriptomic data seems compatible with the hypothesis that that cascades of transcription factors and positive feedback autoregulatory loops predominate early in development, but pass the baton to activity-dependent feedback mechanisms that fine-tune neuronal morphology and synaptic connectivity (see (Fishell and Heintz, 2013; Kepecs and Fishell, 2014) for review).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fishell, G., & Heintz, N.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fishell, Gord
  • Heintz, Nathaniel
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
602-612
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030457340
Cited by
115
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HSSN271200723701C)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5 P50 MH090963 P2, P50MH090963, R01MH071679, R01MH095147)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (RC2DA028968, P30DA035756)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P0NS074972, R01NS081297)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neuronal cell types, molecular ground state, unique molecular identifiers, neuronal heterogeneity, cell identity, nervous system function, central nervous system disorders, treatment options
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Nervous System, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review