Cited by 124Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

More than Meets the Eye: the Relationship between Pupil Size and Locus Coeruleus Activity

Open access
Costa, Vincent D., Rudebeck, Peter H.·2016·Neuron

Abstract

Using both direct neural recordings and electrical microstimulation, Joshi et al. (2016) show that locus coeruleus (LC) activity closely matches moment-to-moment changes in pupil size. But what causes these two measures to be related is not straightforward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.031

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Assuming pupil size indexes NA release from the locus coeruleus, these results suggest raised phasic neuromodulatory signalling in ASD.

    “Thus, under the assumption that pupil size is an index of NA release from the locus coruleus (LC) 40 these results are suggestive of raised phasic neuromodulatory signalling in ASD.”

    From Adults with autism overestimate the volatility of the sensory environment (2017) · cites this paper as [40]

    In the Abstract (page unavailable), the paper says pupil size closely tracks activity in noradrenergic LC neurons, supporting the premise for which it is cited. It does not establish that pupil size indexes noradrenaline release specifically, and it cautions that the mechanism linking pupil size and LC activity remains unclear. The ASD interpretation is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, V. D., & Rudebeck, P. H.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
  • Costa, Vincent D.
  • Rudebeck, Peter H.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
8-10
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2232373047
Cited by
124
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 MH999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
pupil size, locus coeruleus, pupillary light reflex, neuronal activity, electrical microstimulation, arousal
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebellar Cortex, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Neurons, Pupil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review