Cited by 294Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Dynamic Interaction between Reinforcement Learning and Attention in Multidimensional Environments

Open access
Leong, Yuan Chang, Radulescu, Angela, Daniel, Reka, DeWoskin, Vivian, Niv, Yael·2017·Neuron

Abstract

Little is known about the relationship between attention and learning during decision making. Using eye tracking and multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data, we measured participants' dimensional attention as they performed a trial-and-error learning task in which only one of three stimulus dimensions was relevant for reward at any given time. Analysis of participants' choices revealed that attention biased both value computation during choice and value update during learning. Value signals in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and prediction errors in the striatum were similarly biased by attention. In turn, participants' focus of attention was dynamically modulated by ongoing learning. Attentional switches across dimensions correlated with activity in a frontoparietal attention network, which showed enhanced connectivity with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex between switches. Our results suggest a bidirectional interaction between attention and learning: attention constrains learning to relevant dimensions of the environment, while we learn what to attend to via trial and error.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.040

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attention influences the choices we make as well as our learning of reward associations over time.

    “and that attention influences the choices we make as well as our learning of reward associations over time54.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [54]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pearce JM Mackintosh NJ 2010 Two theories of attention: a review and possible integration Attention and Associative Learning Mitchell CJ LePelley ME Oxford University Press 11 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leong, Y. C., Radulescu, A., Daniel, R., DeWoskin, V., & Niv, Y.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Leong, Yuan Chang
  • Radulescu, Angela
  • Niv, Yael
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
451-463
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2577645110
Cited by
294
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 18
FWCI
17.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Human Frontier Science Program Organization (R01MH098861)
  • National Institute for Mental Health (W911NF-14-1-0101)
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
trial-and-error learning, attentional bias, value computation, prediction error, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, striatum, frontoparietal attention network, attentional shift, reward learning, eye tracking, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Environment, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Neostriatum, Prefrontal Cortex, Eye Movement Measurements, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review