Cited by 35Personality Traits and PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Narcissism and risky decisions: a neurophysiological approach

Open access
Yang, Ziyan, Sedikides, Constantine, Gu, Ruolei, Luo, Yu L L, Wang, Yuqi, Cai, Huajian·2018·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Narcissists are prone to risky decision-making, but why? This study tested-via behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) measures-two accounts: deficiencies in error monitoring and deficiencies in action updating. High and low narcissists were engaged in a monetary gambling task by choosing between a high-risk and a low-risk option while the electroencephalogram (EEG) was being recorded. Two ERP components relevant to outcome evaluation-feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3-were analyzed, with the FRN serving as an index of error monitoring and the P3 as an index of action updating. Generally, high and low narcissists differed in the high-risk condition but not in the low-risk condition. At the behavioral level, high (vs low) narcissists made riskier decisions following high-risk decision outcomes, which was in line with past findings; at the neurophysiological level, while no FRN difference emerged between high and low narcissists, the outcome valence effect (positive vs negative) on the P3 was stronger among low narcissists than high narcissists following high-risk decision outcomes. One possible interpretation of the results is that narcissism is associated with reduced action updating. The findings contribute to the understanding of narcissistic decision-making and self-regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsy053

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NPD is associated with avoidant and dismissive cognitive processing, increased risk taking, difficulty learning from mistakes, self-serving attributional bias irrespective of one's performance, and the use of language for self-regulation and not for communication.

    “NPD is associated with avoidant and dismissive cognitive processing (39), increased risk taking (40), difficulty learning from mistakes (40), self-serving attributional bias irrespective of one’s performance (Krusemark, 2009, unpublished dissertation), and the use of language for self-regulation and not for communication (39).”

    From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [40]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By enhancing ACC function and promoting cognitive flexibility, emotion regulation, and fear extinction via 5-HT2A receptor activation, MDMA may help reduce defensive rigidity and social threat hypersensitivity.

    “By enhancing ACC function and promoting cognitive flexibility, emotion regulation, and fear extinction via 5-HT2A receptor activation (97), MDMA may help reduce defensive rigidity and social threat hypersensitivity - core features of PN that contribute to its paradoxical combination of emotional detachment and heightened sensitivity to threats against self-image or social status (98).”

    From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Introduction (no page available) says narcissism affects responses to threats and describes discounting negative feedback; the Discussion reports weaker action updating and persistence in risky choices among high narcissists. These passages support aspects of defensive rigidity and threat-related self-regulation, but they do not establish emotional detachment, social threat hypersensitivity, or these as core features of pathological narcissism. The MDMA mechanism is attached to citation 97, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MDMA's modulation of the amygdala and salience network may attenuate exaggerated threat responses to social evaluation, facilitating more adaptive interpersonal processing.

    “Additionally, MDMA’s modulation of the amygdala and salience network may attenuate exaggerated threat responses to social evaluation, facilitating more adaptive interpersonal processing (98).”

    From Psychoanalytically informed MDMA-assisted therapy for pathological narcissism: a novel theoretical approach (2025) · cites this paper as [98]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports narcissism-related risky choices and differences in feedback processing during a monetary gambling task. Searches for MDMA, the amygdala, the salience network, and threat responses to social evaluation found no passage addressing the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Campbell W.K., Foster J.D. (2007). The narcissistic self: background, and extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In: Sedikides C., Spencer S., editors. Frontiers in Social Psychology: The Self, Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press, 115– 38.
  2. Campbell W.K., Green J.D. (2007). Narcissism and interpersonal self-regulation. In: Wood J.V., Tesser A., Holmes J.G., editors. Self and Relationships, New York, NY: Psychology Press, 73– 94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Sedikides, C., Gu, R., Luo, Y. L. L., Wang, Y., & Cai, H.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Gu, Ruolei
  • Cai, Huajian
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2018-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
889-897
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2884067378
Cited by
35
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571148, 31300871, 31571124)
  • Major Program of the Chinese National Social Science Foundation (17ZDA324)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y5CX052003)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
narcissism, risky decision making, feedback-related negativity, P300, error monitoring, outcome valence, self-regulation, outcome measurement
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Electrooculography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Gambling, Humans, Male, Narcissism, Risk-Taking, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review