Cited by 885Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Orbitofrontal Cortex as a Cognitive Map of Task Space

Open access
Wilson, Robert C., Takahashi, Yuji K., Schoenbaum, Geoffrey, Niv, Yael·2014·Neuron

Abstract

Orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has long been known to play an important role in decision making. However, the exact nature of that role has remained elusive. Here, we propose a unifying theory of OFC function. We hypothesize that OFC provides an abstraction of currently available information in the form of a labeling of the current task state, which is used for reinforcement learning (RL) elsewhere in the brain. This function is especially critical when task states include unobservable information, for instance, from working memory. We use this framework to explain classic findings in reversal learning, delayed alternation, extinction, and devaluation as well as more recent findings showing the effect of OFC lesions on the firing of dopaminergic neurons in ventral tegmental area (VTA) in rodents performing an RL task. In addition, we generate a number of testable experimental predictions that can distinguish our theory from other accounts of OFC function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.005

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OFC is critical for contextual knowledge of outcome expectation, which hierarchically regulates performance of already acquired behaviors.

    “In addition, it has been reported that the OFC is critical for contextual knowledge of outcome expectation, which hierarchically regulates performance of already acquired behaviors51,52.”

    From Dissociable roles of prefrontal plasticity in decision-making strategy and execution of habitual behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Introduction and Results > Reversal learning propose that OFC represents context-dependent task states, allowing previously learned action preferences to guide behavior when reward contingencies recur. The paper does not describe this as hierarchical regulation by knowledge of outcome expectations; Results > Insights into the role of OFC from dopamine firing patterns instead distinguishes OFC state representation from directly encoding expected value. The cited account is a theoretical proposal, not an established finding that OFC is critical in all such behavior. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The brain may have dedicated machinery, perhaps in prefrontal cortex, for computing belief states, which could then be provided to downstream areas, such as the basal ganglia, to perform standard RL algorithms such as TD learning.

    “The brain may have dedicated machinery, perhaps in prefrontal cortex [12,13], for computing belief states, which could then be provided to downstream areas, such as the basal ganglia, to perform standard RL algorithms such as TD learning [14].”
  • Previous work has suggested that prefrontal cortex may perform state estimation in tasks with hidden states.

    “For instance, previous work has suggested that prefrontal cortex may perform state estimation in tasks with hidden states [6,7,12,13].”
  • Positively and negatively valenced functions take place within the prefrontal cortex.

    “There is excellent evidence that these positively and negatively valenced functions take place within the PFC [168][169][170].”
  • In the rodent (agranular) OFC, both reward value and behavioural responses are represented, making the rodent OFC very different from the primate OFC.

    “Fourth, although reward value is represented in the rodent (agranular) OFC, so also apparently are behavioural responses (Schoenbaum et al., 2009; Wilson et al., 2014; Sharpe et al., 2015, 2019; Izquierdo, 2017), which makes the rodent OFC very different to the primate OFC.”

    From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, R. C., Takahashi, Y. K., Schoenbaum, G., & Niv, Y.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wilson, Robert C.
  • Niv, Yael
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
267-279
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119259385
Cited by
885
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 112 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 20
FWCI
31.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH098861, T32MH065214)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
orbitofrontal cortex, cognitive maps, reinforcement learning, decision-making, working memory, reversal learning, delayed alternation, extinction, currency devaluation, dopaminergic neurons, ventral tegmental area
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Cognition, Decision Making, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Reinforcement, Psychology, Prefrontal Cortex, Ventral Tegmental Area, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review