Cited by 33Coffee research and impactsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Sucrose or sucrose and caffeine differentially impact memory and anxiety-like behaviours, and alter hippocampal parvalbumin and doublecortin

Open access
Xu, Tanya J., Reichelt, Amy C.·2018·Neuropharmacology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Caffeinated sugar-sweetened "energy" drinks are a subset of soft drinks that are popular among young people worldwide. High sucrose diets impair cognition and alter aspects of emotional behaviour in rats, however, little is known about sucrose combined with caffeine. Rats were allocated to 2 h/day 10% sucrose (Suc), 10% sucrose plus 0.04% caffeine (CafSuc) or control (water) conditions. The addition of caffeine to sucrose appeared to increase the rewarding aspect of sucrose, as the CafSuc group consumed more solution than the Suc group. After 14 days of intermittent Suc or CafSuc access, anxiety was assessed in the elevated plus maze (EPM) prior to their daily solution access, whereby CafSuc and Suc rats spent more time in the closed arms, indicative of increased anxiety. Following daily solution access, CafSuc, but not Suc, rats showed reduced anxiety-like behaviour in the open-field. Control and CafSuc rats displayed intact place and long-term object memory, while Suc showed impaired memory performance. Sucrose reduced parvalbumin immunoreactivity in the hippocampus, but no differences were observed between Control and CafSuc conditions. Parvalbumin reactivity in the basolateral amygdala did not differ between conditions. Reduced doublecortin immunoreactivity in the dentate gyrus relative to controls was seen in the CafSuc, but not Suc, treatment conditions. These findings indicate that the addition of caffeine to sucrose attenuated cognitive deficits. However, the addition of caffeine to sucrose evoked anxiety-like responses under certain testing conditions, suggesting that frequent consumption of caffeinated energy drinks may promote emotional alterations and brain changes compared to standard soft drinks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.04.012

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolonged intake of high sucrose or fructose diets can induce anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors and motivational deficits in rodents.

    “While sugar consumption can alleviate stress and pain and improve negative mood and emotional states in the short-term [52], prolonged intake of high sucrose or fructose diets can induce anxiety-and depressive-like behaviors and motivational deficits [53][54][55], effects that are more pronounced during the adolescent period [55][56][57].”

    From The menace of obesity to depression and anxiety prevalence (2022) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, T. J., & Reichelt, A. C.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Reichelt, Amy C.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
137
Pages
24-32
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951753322
Cited by
33
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research (DE140101071)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
sucrose, caffeine, energy drinks, sugar-sweetened beverages, anxiety-like behavior, memory impairment, hippocampus, parvalbumin, doublecortin, dentate gyrus, basolateral amygdala, sucrose reward, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Doublecortin Domain Proteins, Doublecortin Protein, Animals, Anxiety, Caffeine, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Motor Activity, Neuropeptides, Parvalbumins, Psychotropic Drugs, Reward, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Dietary Sucrose, Energy Drinks, Basolateral Nuclear Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review