Cited by 71Schizophrenia research and treatmentFree Will and AgencyMental Health and Psychiatry

Deficits in sensory prediction are related to delusional ideation in healthy individuals

Open access

Abstract

Motor control strongly relies on neural processes that predict the sensory consequences of self-generated actions. Previous research has demonstrated deficits in such sensory-predictive processes in schizophrenic patients and these low-level deficits are thought to contribute to the emergence of delusions of control. Here, we examined the extent to which individual differences in sensory prediction are associated with a tendency towards delusional ideation in healthy participants. We used a force-matching task to quantify sensory-predictive processes, and administered questionnaires to assess schizotypy and delusion-like thinking. Individuals with higher levels of delusional ideation showed more accurate force matching suggesting that such thinking is associated with a reduced tendency to predict and attenuate the sensory consequences of self-generated actions. These results suggest that deficits in sensory prediction in schizophrenia are not simply consequences of the deluded state and are not related to neuroleptic medication. Rather they appear to be stable, trait-like characteristics of an individual, a finding that has important implications for our understanding of the neurocognitive basis of delusions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.024

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The illusion is attenuated in normal subjects that score highly on ratings of delusional beliefs.

    “The illusion is attenuated in normal subjects that score highly on ratings of delusional beliefs (Teufel et al., 2010).”

    From The Computational Anatomy of Psychosis (2013) · cites this paper as Teufel et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bays P.M. Flanagan J.R. Wolpert D.M. Attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations is predictive, not postdictive PLoS Biology 4 2006 281 284 PMC1334241 16402860
  2. Bays P.M. Wolpert D.M. Predictive attenuation in the perception of touch Haggard P. Rosetti Y. Kawato M. Attention & performance XXII: Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition 2007 Oxford University Press Oxford 339 358
  3. Bays P.M. Wolpert D.M. Flanagan J.R. Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven Current Biology 15 2005 1125 1128 15964278
  4. Blakemore S.J. Wolpert D.M. Frith C.D. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation Nature Neuroscience 1 1998 635 640 10196573
  5. Chapman L.J. Chapman J.P. Kwapil T.R. Eckblad M. Zinser M.C. Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103 1994 171 183 8040487
  6. Chapman L.J. Chapman J.P. Raulin M.L. Body-image aberration in schizophrenia Journal of Abnormal Psychology 87 1978 399 407 681612
  7. Claridge G. Single indicator of risk for schizophrenia: Probable fact or likely myth Schizophrenia Bulletin 20 1994 151 168 8197412
  8. Crow T.J. From Kraepelin to Kretschmer leavened by Schneider: The transition from categories of psychosis to dimensions of variation intrinsic to Homo sapiens Archives Of General Psychiatry 55 1998 502 504 9633667
  9. Eckblad M. Chapman L.J. Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51 1983 215 225 6841765
  10. Fletcher P.C. Frith C.D. Perceiving is believing: A Bayesian approach to explaining the positive symptoms of schizophrenia Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10 2009 48 58 19050712
  11. Frith C.D. Blakemore S.J. Wolpert D.M. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 355 2000 1771 1788 11205340 PMC1692910
  12. Levenson H. Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 41 1973 397 404 4803272
  13. Lindner A. Haarmeier T. Erb M. Grodd W. Thier P. Cerebrocerebellar circuits for the perceptual cancellation of eye-movement-induced retinal image motion Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 2006 1899 1912 17069480
  14. Lindner A. Thier P. Kircher T.T.J. Haarmeier T. Leube D.T. Disorders of agency in schizophrenia correlate with an inability to compensate for the sensory consequences of actions Current Biology 15 2005 1119 1124 15964277
  15. Oldfield R.C. Assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia 9 1971 97 113 5146491
  16. Shergill S.S. Bays P.M. Frith C.D. Wolpert D.M. Two eyes for an eye: The neuroscience of force escalation Science 301 2003 187 1187 12855800
  17. Synofzik M. Thier P. Leube D.T. Schlotterbeck P. Lindner A. Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one's actions Brain 133 2010 262 271 19995870
  18. Wolpert D.M. Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction Current Biology 11 2001 R729 R732 11566114

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teufel, C., Kingdon, A., Ingram, J. N., Wolpert, D. M., & Fletcher, P. C.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Teufel, Christoph
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
48
Issue
14
Pages
4169-4172
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143555335
Cited by
71
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (064351)
  • Isaac Newton Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
sensory prediction, delusional ideation, delusions of control, schizotypy, force-matching task, self-generated action, individual differences, schizophrenia, antipsychotic drugs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Awareness, Decision Making, Delusions, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review