Cited by 60Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

Influence of prior beliefs on perception in early psychosis: Effects of illness stage and hierarchical level of belief.

Open access
Haarsma, Joost, Knolle, Franziska, Griffin, Juliet D., Taverne, Hilde, Mada, Marius, Goodyer, Ian M., The NSPN Consortium, Fletcher, Paul C. +1 more·2020·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Alterations in the balance between prior expectations and sensory evidence may account for faulty perceptions and inferences leading to psychosis. However, uncertainties remain about the nature of altered prior expectations and the degree to which they vary with the emergence of psychosis. We explored how expectations arising at two different levels-cognitive and perceptual-influenced processing of sensory information and whether relative influences of higher- and lower-level priors differed across people with prodromal symptoms and those with psychotic illness. In two complementary auditory perception experiments, 91 participants (30 with first-episode psychosis, 29 at clinical risk for psychosis, and 32 controls) were required to decipher a phoneme within ambiguous auditory input. Expectations were generated in two ways: an accompanying visual input of lip movements observed during auditory presentation or through written presentation of a phoneme provided prior to auditory presentation. We determined how these different types of information shaped auditory perceptual experience, how this was altered across the prodromal and established phases of psychosis, and how this relates to cingulate glutamate levels assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The psychosis group relied more on high-level cognitive priors compared to both healthy controls and those at clinical risk for psychosis and relied more on low-level perceptual priors than the clinical risk group. The risk group was marginally less reliant on low-level perceptual priors than controls. The results are consistent with previous theory that influences of prior expectations in perceptions in psychosis differ according to level of prior and illness phase. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000494

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hierarchical predictive coding suggests that hallucinations arise from disrupted balance between top-down expectations and bottom-up sensory inputs, with a stronger influence of expectations in people with hallucinations.

    “hierarchical predictive coding, a cognitive model of psychosis, suggests that hallucinations arise from disrupted balance between top-down expectations and bottom-up sensory inputs, with a stronger influence of expectations observed in people with hallucinations11–13”

    From Deviations in effective connectivity explain different hallucination subtypes in Parkinson's disease psychosis (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says predictive coding links abnormal perception to a shifted balance between prior expectations and sensory input. The paper also reports that an expectation-driven auditory omission effect is stronger in people with hallucinations, but it limits that observation to learned cognitive expectations and cautions that expectations are not stronger across all levels or stages of psychosis. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Davies D. J. (2017). Latent class analysis of healthy cohort reveals different subgroups of psychosis vulnerability. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  2. Jeffreys H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haarsma, J., Knolle, F., Griffin, J. D., Taverne, H., Mada, M., Goodyer, I. M., The NSPN Consortium, Fletcher, P. C., & Murray, G. K.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Murray, Graham K.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2020-08
Volume
129
Issue
6
Pages
581-598
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W3048182146
Cited by
60
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network
  • Wellcome Trust (095844/Z/11/Z, 093270)
  • Bernard Wolfe Health Neuroscience Fund
  • Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
early psychosis, prior expectations, perceptual priors, auditory perception, phoneme identification, lip reading, prodromal psychosis, first-episode psychosis, disease stage, hierarchical priors, sensory evidence
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review