Cited by 115Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Perception of emotions from facial expressions in high-functioning adults with autism

Open access
Kennedy, Daniel P., Adolphs, Ralph·2012·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Impairment in social communication is one of the diagnostic hallmarks of autism spectrum disorders, and a large body of research has documented aspects of impaired social cognition in autism, both at the level of the processes and the neural structures involved. Yet one of the most common social communicative abilities in everyday life, the ability to judge somebody's emotion from their facial expression, has yielded conflicting findings. To investigate this issue, we used a sensitive task that has been used to assess facial emotion perception in a number of neurological and psychiatric populations. Fifteen high-functioning adults with autism and 19 control participants rated the emotional intensity of 36 faces displaying basic emotions. Every face was rated 6 times-once for each emotion category. The autism group gave ratings that were significantly less sensitive to a given emotion, and less reliable across repeated testing, resulting in overall decreased specificity in emotion perception. We thus demonstrate a subtle but specific pattern of impairments in facial emotion perception in people with autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.038

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kennedy, D. P., & Adolphs, R.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kennedy, Daniel P.
  • Adolphs, Ralph
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
50
Issue
14
Pages
3313-3319
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118698102
Cited by
115
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation (SFARI-07-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99 MH094409)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, emotional face processing, high-functioning adults, social cognition, social communication deficits, test-retest reliability, basic emotions
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Autistic Disorder, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Case-Control Studies, Mood Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review