Cited by 478Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Recognition of faces: an approach to the study of autism

Langdell, Tim·1978·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

SUMMARY Two age groups of normal, autistic and subnormal children were tested for their ability to recognize the faces of peers from isolated facial features and inverted photographs. The normal and subnormal subjects found the upper regions of the face most helpful for identification, whereas the younger autistic children found the lower features more helpful. The older autistic children showed no specific reliance on any one area, but were found to have error scores as low as those of the younger autistic children on the recognition of lower parts and error scores as low as the; controls on recognizing upper portions. The results are discussed and are found to favour a hypothesis in which the autistic child's familiarity with the mouth and/or eye areas is related to a cognitive deficit which affects the processing of both verbal and non‐verbal interpersonal communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1978.tb00468.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In structured viewing tasks, people with autism may rely less on eye information and sometimes more on mouth information.

    “In general, however, this literature is consistent with Langdell’s 14 original hypothesis: individuals with autism show attenuated reliance on information from the eyes region of the face and, at least in some situations, over-reliance on information from the mouth region of the face when performing structured viewing tasks (e.g., recognition of face identity or emotional expressions).”
  • Langdell's (1978) original suggestion that children with ASD are less affected by facial inversion has received only mixed support.

    “Langdell's (1978) original suggestion that children with ASD are less affected by facial inversion has received only mixed support.”

    From Vision in autism spectrum disorders (2009) · cites this paper as Langdell (1978)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langdell, T.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Langdell, Tim
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-07
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
255-268
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2102076610
Cited by
478
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
face recognition (cognition), autism spectrum disorder, facial features, cognitive impairment, interpersonal communication, subnormal children, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Autistic Disorder, Child, Cognition Disorders, Communication, Eye, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Male, Intellectual Disability, Mouth, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Peer Group, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review